Mario Scheurer, Johannes Schulze, Thomas Lins, Tobias Daut, Robin Kasper, Frank Wilde, Alexander Schramm, Marcel Ebeling, Andreas Sakkas
{"title":"在上颌先入路的双颌正颌手术中,使用患者特异性导向器和骨合成种植体进行下颌定位。3 d-analysis。","authors":"Mario Scheurer, Johannes Schulze, Thomas Lins, Tobias Daut, Robin Kasper, Frank Wilde, Alexander Schramm, Marcel Ebeling, Andreas Sakkas","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a fully 3D planned digital workflow for bimaxillary osteotomies, utilizing patient-specific osteotomy and drill guides (PSDOG) and osteosynthesis implants (PSOI), within a maxilla-first approach. Emphasis was placed on the accuracy of guided mandibular positioning. This retrospective study included 30 patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery [bimaxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 1; n = 11) versus maxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 2; n = 19)]. 3D CT datasets were used for accuracy assessment. Primary outcome parameter was the accuracy of the intraoperative mandibular transfer evaluated on cephalometric landmarks. Secondary outcome parameter was the 3D accuracy of mandibular positioning. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant vertical undercorrections and lateral deviations in the positioning of proximal mandibular segments (adj. p < 0.05). 3D analysis revealed a trend towards lower maximal deviations at the left ascending ramus in Group 1 (p = 0.058). Moderate positional accuracy was observed, with the largest vector deviations occurring in the latero-inferior-anterior direction. Iatrogenic injuries and bad splits were lower in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.52). Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.21). Fully guided and patient-specific orthognathic procedures enable precise and reproducible mandibular repositioning and may contribute to a reduction in intraoperative complication rates. However, control of the proximal segments, particularly condylar positioning, remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandibular positioning using patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis implants in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxilla-first approach. A 3D-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Scheurer, Johannes Schulze, Thomas Lins, Tobias Daut, Robin Kasper, Frank Wilde, Alexander Schramm, Marcel Ebeling, Andreas Sakkas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a fully 3D planned digital workflow for bimaxillary osteotomies, utilizing patient-specific osteotomy and drill guides (PSDOG) and osteosynthesis implants (PSOI), within a maxilla-first approach. Emphasis was placed on the accuracy of guided mandibular positioning. This retrospective study included 30 patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery [bimaxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 1; n = 11) versus maxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 2; n = 19)]. 3D CT datasets were used for accuracy assessment. Primary outcome parameter was the accuracy of the intraoperative mandibular transfer evaluated on cephalometric landmarks. Secondary outcome parameter was the 3D accuracy of mandibular positioning. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant vertical undercorrections and lateral deviations in the positioning of proximal mandibular segments (adj. p < 0.05). 3D analysis revealed a trend towards lower maximal deviations at the left ascending ramus in Group 1 (p = 0.058). Moderate positional accuracy was observed, with the largest vector deviations occurring in the latero-inferior-anterior direction. Iatrogenic injuries and bad splits were lower in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.52). Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.21). Fully guided and patient-specific orthognathic procedures enable precise and reproducible mandibular repositioning and may contribute to a reduction in intraoperative complication rates. However, control of the proximal segments, particularly condylar positioning, remains limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.08.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mandibular positioning using patient-specific guides and osteosynthesis implants in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with maxilla-first approach. A 3D-analysis.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a fully 3D planned digital workflow for bimaxillary osteotomies, utilizing patient-specific osteotomy and drill guides (PSDOG) and osteosynthesis implants (PSOI), within a maxilla-first approach. Emphasis was placed on the accuracy of guided mandibular positioning. This retrospective study included 30 patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery [bimaxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 1; n = 11) versus maxillary PSDOG/PSOI (Group 2; n = 19)]. 3D CT datasets were used for accuracy assessment. Primary outcome parameter was the accuracy of the intraoperative mandibular transfer evaluated on cephalometric landmarks. Secondary outcome parameter was the 3D accuracy of mandibular positioning. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant vertical undercorrections and lateral deviations in the positioning of proximal mandibular segments (adj. p < 0.05). 3D analysis revealed a trend towards lower maximal deviations at the left ascending ramus in Group 1 (p = 0.058). Moderate positional accuracy was observed, with the largest vector deviations occurring in the latero-inferior-anterior direction. Iatrogenic injuries and bad splits were lower in Group 1 (p ≥ 0.52). Duration of surgery did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.21). Fully guided and patient-specific orthognathic procedures enable precise and reproducible mandibular repositioning and may contribute to a reduction in intraoperative complication rates. However, control of the proximal segments, particularly condylar positioning, remains limited.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included:
• Distraction osteogenesis
• Synthetic bone substitutes
• Fibroblast growth factors
• Fetal wound healing
• Skull base surgery
• Computer-assisted surgery
• Vascularized bone grafts