{"title":"个体和群体问题解决疗法治疗企图自杀的精神病患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"M Neslihan Turgut, Mehmet Eskin","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2546590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study tested the comparative efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy (PST) in psychiatric outpatients who have attempted suicide in a randomized controlled trial. The sample consisted of 39 Turkish adults admitted to psychiatric units due to a suicide attempt who were randomly assigned to an individual (indPST) and a group (grPST) and a waiting-list control condition (13 participants in each group). Participants responded first to sociodemographic questions; then they filled in a Suicide Probability Scale, a Beck Depression Inventory, a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, a Revised Social Problem Solving Inventory-Short Form, and a Cognitive Flexibility Inventory before and after the intervention or waiting period. Participants enrolled in the two PST conditions filled in the measures three months after the end of the intervention for follow-up. We employed a repeated measures analysis of variance procedure to analyze the data and calculated the effect sizes using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20.0 (SPSS). The findings showed that the efficacy of the indPST and grPST was comparable. While the suicide probability and depression scale scores of participants in the two PST conditions decreased, their cognitive flexibility and social problem-solving scores increased significantly after the intervention. The changes correspond to large effect sizes. However, the scale scores of participants within the waiting list control condition were unchanged. The improvements gained within the PST conditions were maintained at three three-month follow-ups. We conclude that the individual and group PST may equally be efficacious for treating suicidal psychiatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy in treating psychiatric patients who attempted suicide: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"M Neslihan Turgut, Mehmet Eskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13548506.2025.2546590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study tested the comparative efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy (PST) in psychiatric outpatients who have attempted suicide in a randomized controlled trial. The sample consisted of 39 Turkish adults admitted to psychiatric units due to a suicide attempt who were randomly assigned to an individual (indPST) and a group (grPST) and a waiting-list control condition (13 participants in each group). Participants responded first to sociodemographic questions; then they filled in a Suicide Probability Scale, a Beck Depression Inventory, a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, a Revised Social Problem Solving Inventory-Short Form, and a Cognitive Flexibility Inventory before and after the intervention or waiting period. Participants enrolled in the two PST conditions filled in the measures three months after the end of the intervention for follow-up. We employed a repeated measures analysis of variance procedure to analyze the data and calculated the effect sizes using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20.0 (SPSS). The findings showed that the efficacy of the indPST and grPST was comparable. While the suicide probability and depression scale scores of participants in the two PST conditions decreased, their cognitive flexibility and social problem-solving scores increased significantly after the intervention. The changes correspond to large effect sizes. However, the scale scores of participants within the waiting list control condition were unchanged. The improvements gained within the PST conditions were maintained at three three-month follow-ups. We conclude that the individual and group PST may equally be efficacious for treating suicidal psychiatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Health & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2546590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2546590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy in treating psychiatric patients who attempted suicide: a randomized controlled trial.
This study tested the comparative efficacy of individual and group problem-solving therapy (PST) in psychiatric outpatients who have attempted suicide in a randomized controlled trial. The sample consisted of 39 Turkish adults admitted to psychiatric units due to a suicide attempt who were randomly assigned to an individual (indPST) and a group (grPST) and a waiting-list control condition (13 participants in each group). Participants responded first to sociodemographic questions; then they filled in a Suicide Probability Scale, a Beck Depression Inventory, a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, a Revised Social Problem Solving Inventory-Short Form, and a Cognitive Flexibility Inventory before and after the intervention or waiting period. Participants enrolled in the two PST conditions filled in the measures three months after the end of the intervention for follow-up. We employed a repeated measures analysis of variance procedure to analyze the data and calculated the effect sizes using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences 20.0 (SPSS). The findings showed that the efficacy of the indPST and grPST was comparable. While the suicide probability and depression scale scores of participants in the two PST conditions decreased, their cognitive flexibility and social problem-solving scores increased significantly after the intervention. The changes correspond to large effect sizes. However, the scale scores of participants within the waiting list control condition were unchanged. The improvements gained within the PST conditions were maintained at three three-month follow-ups. We conclude that the individual and group PST may equally be efficacious for treating suicidal psychiatric patients.
期刊介绍:
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.