一项随机临床试验:布比卡因脂质体阻滞浅表胸骨旁肋间平面并没有显著减少心脏手术后阿片类药物的使用。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Eric R Simon, Alysan Mallery, John Silva, Andreas de Biasi, Satoru Osaki, Bryan M Krause, Patrick Meyer
{"title":"一项随机临床试验:布比卡因脂质体阻滞浅表胸骨旁肋间平面并没有显著减少心脏手术后阿片类药物的使用。","authors":"Eric R Simon, Alysan Mallery, John Silva, Andreas de Biasi, Satoru Osaki, Bryan M Krause, Patrick Meyer","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy is commonly managed with multimodal analgesia, but optimal regional techniques remain uncertain. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks have shown promise for postoperative pain control, with the use of catheters extending these benefits up to three days. This study evaluated the efficacy of single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine in reducing opioid consumption following cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to receive bilateral SPIP blocks with either a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine or saline placebo prior to incision. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) over the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and opioid use at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total opioid consumption in the first 72 hours was not significantly different between groups (SPIP intervention: 165 (IQR 103-284) MME vs saline placebo: 205 (IQR 145-282) MME, p=0.30). Pain scores, extubation time, ICU and hospital length of stay, and opioid use at 90 days were also similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preincision bilateral SPIP blocks with a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid consumption or improve postoperative analgesic outcomes compared with saline placebo in cardiac surgical patients. These findings suggest that single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine may not be as effective as repeated injections or catheters in cardiac surgical patients. Further studies should explore modifications to block techniques such as multilevel injections, the timing of the block relative to surgery, alternative local anesthetics, and strategies specifically targeting chest tube-related pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04928339.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid use after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Eric R Simon, Alysan Mallery, John Silva, Andreas de Biasi, Satoru Osaki, Bryan M Krause, Patrick Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-106952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy is commonly managed with multimodal analgesia, but optimal regional techniques remain uncertain. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks have shown promise for postoperative pain control, with the use of catheters extending these benefits up to three days. This study evaluated the efficacy of single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine in reducing opioid consumption following cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to receive bilateral SPIP blocks with either a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine or saline placebo prior to incision. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) over the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and opioid use at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total opioid consumption in the first 72 hours was not significantly different between groups (SPIP intervention: 165 (IQR 103-284) MME vs saline placebo: 205 (IQR 145-282) MME, p=0.30). Pain scores, extubation time, ICU and hospital length of stay, and opioid use at 90 days were also similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preincision bilateral SPIP blocks with a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid consumption or improve postoperative analgesic outcomes compared with saline placebo in cardiac surgical patients. These findings suggest that single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine may not be as effective as repeated injections or catheters in cardiac surgical patients. Further studies should explore modifications to block techniques such as multilevel injections, the timing of the block relative to surgery, alternative local anesthetics, and strategies specifically targeting chest tube-related pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04928339.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸骨正中切口心脏手术后的急性疼痛通常采用多模式镇痛,但最佳区域技术仍不确定。浅表胸骨旁肋间平面(SPIP)阻滞已显示出术后疼痛控制的希望,使用导管可将这些益处延长至三天。本研究评估了布比卡因脂质体单次注射SPIP阻滞在减少心脏手术后阿片类药物消耗方面的疗效。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验中,100名接受择期冠状动脉搭桥术或经胸骨正中切开瓣膜手术的患者被随机分为两组,分别在切口前接受布比卡因和布比卡因脂质体混合物或生理盐水安慰剂的双侧SPIP阻滞。主要结局是术后72小时内口服吗啡毫克当量(MME)的阿片类药物总消耗量。次要结局包括疼痛评分、拔管时间、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间以及90天的阿片类药物使用情况。结果:组间前72小时阿片类药物总消耗量无显著差异(SPIP干预:165 (IQR 103-284) MME vs生理盐水安慰剂:205 (IQR 145-282) MME, p=0.30)。疼痛评分、拔管时间、ICU和住院时间以及90天阿片类药物的使用在两组之间也相似。无严重不良事件报告。结论:与生理盐水安慰剂相比,布比卡因和布比卡因脂质体混合的切开前双侧SPIP阻滞不能显著减少心脏手术患者的阿片类药物消耗或改善术后镇痛效果。这些发现表明,在心脏手术患者中,单次注射布比卡因脂质体SPIP阻滞可能不如反复注射或导管有效。进一步的研究应该探索对阻滞技术的改进,如多级注射、相对于手术的阻滞时间、替代局部麻醉剂和专门针对胸管相关疼痛的策略。试验注册号:NCT04928339。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid use after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: Acute pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy is commonly managed with multimodal analgesia, but optimal regional techniques remain uncertain. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks have shown promise for postoperative pain control, with the use of catheters extending these benefits up to three days. This study evaluated the efficacy of single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine in reducing opioid consumption following cardiac surgery.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to receive bilateral SPIP blocks with either a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine or saline placebo prior to incision. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) over the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and opioid use at 90 days.

Results: Total opioid consumption in the first 72 hours was not significantly different between groups (SPIP intervention: 165 (IQR 103-284) MME vs saline placebo: 205 (IQR 145-282) MME, p=0.30). Pain scores, extubation time, ICU and hospital length of stay, and opioid use at 90 days were also similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Preincision bilateral SPIP blocks with a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid consumption or improve postoperative analgesic outcomes compared with saline placebo in cardiac surgical patients. These findings suggest that single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine may not be as effective as repeated injections or catheters in cardiac surgical patients. Further studies should explore modifications to block techniques such as multilevel injections, the timing of the block relative to surgery, alternative local anesthetics, and strategies specifically targeting chest tube-related pain.

Trial registration number: NCT04928339.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信