Eric R Simon, Alysan Mallery, John Silva, Andreas de Biasi, Satoru Osaki, Bryan M Krause, Patrick Meyer
{"title":"一项随机临床试验:布比卡因脂质体阻滞浅表胸骨旁肋间平面并没有显著减少心脏手术后阿片类药物的使用。","authors":"Eric R Simon, Alysan Mallery, John Silva, Andreas de Biasi, Satoru Osaki, Bryan M Krause, Patrick Meyer","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy is commonly managed with multimodal analgesia, but optimal regional techniques remain uncertain. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks have shown promise for postoperative pain control, with the use of catheters extending these benefits up to three days. This study evaluated the efficacy of single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine in reducing opioid consumption following cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to receive bilateral SPIP blocks with either a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine or saline placebo prior to incision. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) over the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and opioid use at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total opioid consumption in the first 72 hours was not significantly different between groups (SPIP intervention: 165 (IQR 103-284) MME vs saline placebo: 205 (IQR 145-282) MME, p=0.30). Pain scores, extubation time, ICU and hospital length of stay, and opioid use at 90 days were also similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preincision bilateral SPIP blocks with a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid consumption or improve postoperative analgesic outcomes compared with saline placebo in cardiac surgical patients. These findings suggest that single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine may not be as effective as repeated injections or catheters in cardiac surgical patients. Further studies should explore modifications to block techniques such as multilevel injections, the timing of the block relative to surgery, alternative local anesthetics, and strategies specifically targeting chest tube-related pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04928339.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid use after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Eric R Simon, Alysan Mallery, John Silva, Andreas de Biasi, Satoru Osaki, Bryan M Krause, Patrick Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-106952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy is commonly managed with multimodal analgesia, but optimal regional techniques remain uncertain. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks have shown promise for postoperative pain control, with the use of catheters extending these benefits up to three days. This study evaluated the efficacy of single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine in reducing opioid consumption following cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to receive bilateral SPIP blocks with either a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine or saline placebo prior to incision. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) over the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and opioid use at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total opioid consumption in the first 72 hours was not significantly different between groups (SPIP intervention: 165 (IQR 103-284) MME vs saline placebo: 205 (IQR 145-282) MME, p=0.30). Pain scores, extubation time, ICU and hospital length of stay, and opioid use at 90 days were also similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preincision bilateral SPIP blocks with a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid consumption or improve postoperative analgesic outcomes compared with saline placebo in cardiac surgical patients. These findings suggest that single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine may not be as effective as repeated injections or catheters in cardiac surgical patients. Further studies should explore modifications to block techniques such as multilevel injections, the timing of the block relative to surgery, alternative local anesthetics, and strategies specifically targeting chest tube-related pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04928339.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid use after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
Background: Acute pain after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy is commonly managed with multimodal analgesia, but optimal regional techniques remain uncertain. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) blocks have shown promise for postoperative pain control, with the use of catheters extending these benefits up to three days. This study evaluated the efficacy of single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine in reducing opioid consumption following cardiac surgery.
Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to receive bilateral SPIP blocks with either a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine or saline placebo prior to incision. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) over the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay and opioid use at 90 days.
Results: Total opioid consumption in the first 72 hours was not significantly different between groups (SPIP intervention: 165 (IQR 103-284) MME vs saline placebo: 205 (IQR 145-282) MME, p=0.30). Pain scores, extubation time, ICU and hospital length of stay, and opioid use at 90 days were also similar between groups. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: Preincision bilateral SPIP blocks with a mixture of bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine did not significantly reduce opioid consumption or improve postoperative analgesic outcomes compared with saline placebo in cardiac surgical patients. These findings suggest that single-injection SPIP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine may not be as effective as repeated injections or catheters in cardiac surgical patients. Further studies should explore modifications to block techniques such as multilevel injections, the timing of the block relative to surgery, alternative local anesthetics, and strategies specifically targeting chest tube-related pain.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).