{"title":"在冠状动脉CT血管造影中使用双单心期采集和全心运动校正技术最小化辐射剂量:一项关于图像质量的前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Xin Fang, Shuang Li, Ping Xie, Huanrui Hu, Wenyu Ting, Yongchun You, Jianying Li, Kaiyue Diao, Wanjiang Li","doi":"10.21037/qims-2025-287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plays an increasingly important role in coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluation, but radiation dose remains a clinical concern. Conventional multi-cardiac phase (CMP) scanning covers wide R-R intervals to ensure optimal image quality, leading to higher radiation exposure. Recent advances in motion correction technology, particularly whole-heart motion correction algorithms, offer potential solutions for dose reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using dual single-cardiac phase (DSP) acquisition (end-systole: 45% R-R interval and end-diastole: 75% R-R interval) in CCTA with a whole-heart motion correction (SnapShot Freeze 2, SSF2) technology to minimize radiation dose and maintain image quality in comparison with CMP scanning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized study, 140 patients were randomly assigned to either DSP (n=70) or CMP (n=70) scanning groups. All examinations were performed on a 256-row wide-detector computed tomography (CT) scanner with similar data acquisition parameters and reconstruction algorithms except cardiac phase range selections. Image quality was assessed both objectively [signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] and subjectively (5-point scale). Image quality, diagnostic confidence, and acceptability between the two groups and across different heart rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DSP scanning achieved 29% radiation dose reduction [volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 19.24±4.59 <i>vs.</i> 27.01±6.02 mGy, P<0.001] with comparable image quality scores in both systolic {5, [interquartile range (IQR), 5.0-5.0] <i>vs.</i> 5 (IQR, 5.0-5.0), Reader 1: P=0.591, Reader 2: P=0.587} and diastolic phases [5 (IQR, 4.0-5.0) <i>vs.</i> 5 (IQR, 4.0-5.0), Reader 1: P=0.908, Reader 2: P=0.951]. All scans in our study cohort were diagnostically acceptable (100%) when both phases were available. Using only systolic or diastolic phases reduced acceptability to 97.1% and 94.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DSP scanning with SSF2 technology achieves significant radiation dose reduction while maintaining comparable image quality to CMP, with 100% diagnostic acceptability when both phases are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 9","pages":"8205-8218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing radiation dose in coronary CT angiography using dual single-cardiac phase acquisition with a whole-heart motion correction technology: a prospective randomized study on image quality.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Fang, Shuang Li, Ping Xie, Huanrui Hu, Wenyu Ting, Yongchun You, Jianying Li, Kaiyue Diao, Wanjiang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-2025-287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plays an increasingly important role in coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluation, but radiation dose remains a clinical concern. Conventional multi-cardiac phase (CMP) scanning covers wide R-R intervals to ensure optimal image quality, leading to higher radiation exposure. Recent advances in motion correction technology, particularly whole-heart motion correction algorithms, offer potential solutions for dose reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using dual single-cardiac phase (DSP) acquisition (end-systole: 45% R-R interval and end-diastole: 75% R-R interval) in CCTA with a whole-heart motion correction (SnapShot Freeze 2, SSF2) technology to minimize radiation dose and maintain image quality in comparison with CMP scanning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized study, 140 patients were randomly assigned to either DSP (n=70) or CMP (n=70) scanning groups. All examinations were performed on a 256-row wide-detector computed tomography (CT) scanner with similar data acquisition parameters and reconstruction algorithms except cardiac phase range selections. Image quality was assessed both objectively [signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] and subjectively (5-point scale). Image quality, diagnostic confidence, and acceptability between the two groups and across different heart rates were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DSP scanning achieved 29% radiation dose reduction [volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 19.24±4.59 <i>vs.</i> 27.01±6.02 mGy, P<0.001] with comparable image quality scores in both systolic {5, [interquartile range (IQR), 5.0-5.0] <i>vs.</i> 5 (IQR, 5.0-5.0), Reader 1: P=0.591, Reader 2: P=0.587} and diastolic phases [5 (IQR, 4.0-5.0) <i>vs.</i> 5 (IQR, 4.0-5.0), Reader 1: P=0.908, Reader 2: P=0.951]. All scans in our study cohort were diagnostically acceptable (100%) when both phases were available. Using only systolic or diastolic phases reduced acceptability to 97.1% and 94.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DSP scanning with SSF2 technology achieves significant radiation dose reduction while maintaining comparable image quality to CMP, with 100% diagnostic acceptability when both phases are available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"8205-8218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397654/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-287\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minimizing radiation dose in coronary CT angiography using dual single-cardiac phase acquisition with a whole-heart motion correction technology: a prospective randomized study on image quality.
Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) plays an increasingly important role in coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluation, but radiation dose remains a clinical concern. Conventional multi-cardiac phase (CMP) scanning covers wide R-R intervals to ensure optimal image quality, leading to higher radiation exposure. Recent advances in motion correction technology, particularly whole-heart motion correction algorithms, offer potential solutions for dose reduction. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using dual single-cardiac phase (DSP) acquisition (end-systole: 45% R-R interval and end-diastole: 75% R-R interval) in CCTA with a whole-heart motion correction (SnapShot Freeze 2, SSF2) technology to minimize radiation dose and maintain image quality in comparison with CMP scanning.
Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 140 patients were randomly assigned to either DSP (n=70) or CMP (n=70) scanning groups. All examinations were performed on a 256-row wide-detector computed tomography (CT) scanner with similar data acquisition parameters and reconstruction algorithms except cardiac phase range selections. Image quality was assessed both objectively [signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] and subjectively (5-point scale). Image quality, diagnostic confidence, and acceptability between the two groups and across different heart rates were evaluated.
Results: DSP scanning achieved 29% radiation dose reduction [volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 19.24±4.59 vs. 27.01±6.02 mGy, P<0.001] with comparable image quality scores in both systolic {5, [interquartile range (IQR), 5.0-5.0] vs. 5 (IQR, 5.0-5.0), Reader 1: P=0.591, Reader 2: P=0.587} and diastolic phases [5 (IQR, 4.0-5.0) vs. 5 (IQR, 4.0-5.0), Reader 1: P=0.908, Reader 2: P=0.951]. All scans in our study cohort were diagnostically acceptable (100%) when both phases were available. Using only systolic or diastolic phases reduced acceptability to 97.1% and 94.3%, respectively.
Conclusions: DSP scanning with SSF2 technology achieves significant radiation dose reduction while maintaining comparable image quality to CMP, with 100% diagnostic acceptability when both phases are available.