高分辨率相对比定量血流磁共振成像评估股骨头血流的可行性和可靠性:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-18 DOI:10.21037/qims-2025-411
Zhenhong Liao, Zhouxuan Wang, Chun Ma, Mengqi Huang, Xiaoyong Zhang, Chengmiao Deng, Lin Chen, Jiayu Sun
{"title":"高分辨率相对比定量血流磁共振成像评估股骨头血流的可行性和可靠性:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Zhenhong Liao, Zhouxuan Wang, Chun Ma, Mengqi Huang, Xiaoyong Zhang, Chengmiao Deng, Lin Chen, Jiayu Sun","doi":"10.21037/qims-2025-411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The early identification of abnormal blood supply to the femoral head is crucial for timely intervention. High-resolution phase-contrast quantitative-flow (Q-flow) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising non-invasive technique for quantitatively assessing blood flow to the femoral head. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of Q-flow in quantifying blood flow to the femoral head.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 10 healthy volunteers (mean age =35±8.38 years, 6 women), 10 women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), who were using corticosteroids (mean age =36.1±5.47 years), and 10 age-matched healthy women for the SLE patients, who served as controls (mean age =36.2±4.83 years). Q-flow scans were performed on all the participants from October 2023 to August 2024. Q-flow reliability, including retest reliability between scans, and intra- and inter-rater reliability, was evaluated using data from the healthy volunteers. Further, the efficacy of Q-flow was evaluated by comparing the quantification data between the SLE and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Q-flow showed good-to-excellent reliability for the arterial flow parameters [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.61-1], except for the regurgitant fraction (RF; ICC: 0.01-0.97). Q-flow also showed good-to-excellent reliability for the vein flow parameters (ICC: 0.63-1), except for the retest reliability of the RF (ICC: 0.04-0.9), mean velocity (MV; ICC: 0.46-0.84), and peak systolic velocity (PSV; ICC: 0.5-0.73). Compared with the controls, the SLE patients had significantly reduced arterial flow in the medial femoral circumflex artery (MFCA) [stroke and stroke distance (SD), P=0.01 and P<0.01], lateral femoral circumflex artery (LFCA) [stroke, mean flux (MF), SD, MV, and PSV, all P<0.01], and deep MFCA (stroke, MF, SD, MV, and PSV, all P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high-resolution phase-contrast Q-flow technique exhibited acceptable reliability and the capacity to detect early changes in arterial blood flow to the femoral head, highlighting its potential clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 9","pages":"8137-8152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and reliability of high-resolution phase-contrast quantitative-flow magnetic resonance imaging for assessing femoral head blood flow: a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenhong Liao, Zhouxuan Wang, Chun Ma, Mengqi Huang, Xiaoyong Zhang, Chengmiao Deng, Lin Chen, Jiayu Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-2025-411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The early identification of abnormal blood supply to the femoral head is crucial for timely intervention. High-resolution phase-contrast quantitative-flow (Q-flow) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising non-invasive technique for quantitatively assessing blood flow to the femoral head. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of Q-flow in quantifying blood flow to the femoral head.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 10 healthy volunteers (mean age =35±8.38 years, 6 women), 10 women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), who were using corticosteroids (mean age =36.1±5.47 years), and 10 age-matched healthy women for the SLE patients, who served as controls (mean age =36.2±4.83 years). Q-flow scans were performed on all the participants from October 2023 to August 2024. Q-flow reliability, including retest reliability between scans, and intra- and inter-rater reliability, was evaluated using data from the healthy volunteers. Further, the efficacy of Q-flow was evaluated by comparing the quantification data between the SLE and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Q-flow showed good-to-excellent reliability for the arterial flow parameters [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.61-1], except for the regurgitant fraction (RF; ICC: 0.01-0.97). Q-flow also showed good-to-excellent reliability for the vein flow parameters (ICC: 0.63-1), except for the retest reliability of the RF (ICC: 0.04-0.9), mean velocity (MV; ICC: 0.46-0.84), and peak systolic velocity (PSV; ICC: 0.5-0.73). Compared with the controls, the SLE patients had significantly reduced arterial flow in the medial femoral circumflex artery (MFCA) [stroke and stroke distance (SD), P=0.01 and P<0.01], lateral femoral circumflex artery (LFCA) [stroke, mean flux (MF), SD, MV, and PSV, all P<0.01], and deep MFCA (stroke, MF, SD, MV, and PSV, all P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high-resolution phase-contrast Q-flow technique exhibited acceptable reliability and the capacity to detect early changes in arterial blood flow to the femoral head, highlighting its potential clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"8137-8152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-411\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期发现股骨头血供异常对及时干预至关重要。高分辨率相对比定量流量(Q-flow)磁共振成像(MRI)是一种有前途的非侵入性技术,用于定量评估股骨头血流。本研究旨在评价Q-flow定量股骨头血流的可行性和可靠性。方法:本前瞻性研究纳入10名健康志愿者(平均年龄=35±8.38岁,女性6名),10名使用皮质类固醇的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者(平均年龄=36.1±5.47岁),以及10名年龄匹配的SLE患者健康女性作为对照组(平均年龄=36.2±4.83岁)。从2023年10月到2024年8月,对所有参与者进行了q流扫描。使用健康志愿者的数据评估q流信度,包括扫描之间的重测信度以及内部和内部信度。进一步,通过比较SLE组和对照组之间的定量数据来评估Q-flow的疗效。结果:除反流部分(RF; ICC: 0.01-0.97)外,Q-flow对动脉血流参数的可靠性[类内相关系数(intracclass correlation coefficient, ICC): 0.61-1]从良好到优异。除了RF (ICC: 0.04-0.9)、平均流速(MV; ICC: 0.46-0.84)和峰值收缩速度(PSV; ICC: 0.5-0.73)的重测信度外,Q-flow对静脉流量参数(ICC: 0.63-1)也显示出良好到优异的信度。与对照组相比,SLE患者旋股内侧动脉(MFCA)动脉流量明显减少[卒中和卒中距离(SD), P=0.01, P=0.01]。结论:高分辨率相位对比Q-flow技术具有可接受的可靠性和检测股骨头动脉血流早期变化的能力,具有潜在的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and reliability of high-resolution phase-contrast quantitative-flow magnetic resonance imaging for assessing femoral head blood flow: a prospective study.

Background: The early identification of abnormal blood supply to the femoral head is crucial for timely intervention. High-resolution phase-contrast quantitative-flow (Q-flow) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising non-invasive technique for quantitatively assessing blood flow to the femoral head. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of Q-flow in quantifying blood flow to the femoral head.

Methods: This prospective study included 10 healthy volunteers (mean age =35±8.38 years, 6 women), 10 women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), who were using corticosteroids (mean age =36.1±5.47 years), and 10 age-matched healthy women for the SLE patients, who served as controls (mean age =36.2±4.83 years). Q-flow scans were performed on all the participants from October 2023 to August 2024. Q-flow reliability, including retest reliability between scans, and intra- and inter-rater reliability, was evaluated using data from the healthy volunteers. Further, the efficacy of Q-flow was evaluated by comparing the quantification data between the SLE and control groups.

Results: Q-flow showed good-to-excellent reliability for the arterial flow parameters [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.61-1], except for the regurgitant fraction (RF; ICC: 0.01-0.97). Q-flow also showed good-to-excellent reliability for the vein flow parameters (ICC: 0.63-1), except for the retest reliability of the RF (ICC: 0.04-0.9), mean velocity (MV; ICC: 0.46-0.84), and peak systolic velocity (PSV; ICC: 0.5-0.73). Compared with the controls, the SLE patients had significantly reduced arterial flow in the medial femoral circumflex artery (MFCA) [stroke and stroke distance (SD), P=0.01 and P<0.01], lateral femoral circumflex artery (LFCA) [stroke, mean flux (MF), SD, MV, and PSV, all P<0.01], and deep MFCA (stroke, MF, SD, MV, and PSV, all P<0.01).

Conclusions: The high-resolution phase-contrast Q-flow technique exhibited acceptable reliability and the capacity to detect early changes in arterial blood flow to the femoral head, highlighting its potential clinical applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信