爱尔兰岛卫生素养研究:系统回顾。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Maeve Murray, Stephen Behan, Craig Smith, Hannah Goss
{"title":"爱尔兰岛卫生素养研究:系统回顾。","authors":"Maeve Murray, Stephen Behan, Craig Smith, Hannah Goss","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consistently, low health literacy has been found to lead to poorer health outcomes, both internationally, and in Ireland. Given this knowledge, there is a need to understand key thematic trends, methodological approaches and evidence gaps in policy and practice. Seven electronic databases (Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Scopus, PsychoINFO, and SPORTDiscus) were searched between October and December 2023 focusing on studies published in English between 2013 and 2023. Initial peer reviewed records (N  = 551) were screened resulting in 37 studies included in this review. Narrative analysis indicated that across the island of Ireland many studies had narrow populations of focus (e.g. Dublin based, adults, chronic illness populations), limited research design and methodologies (e.g. cross-sectional, narrative, and primary research with short time frames), and lacked rigorous monitoring and evaluation of health literacy as a primary or secondary outcome. Future health literacy research in Ireland should consider: (i) contextual and sociodemographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status) when aiming to improve health literacy in different populations, (ii) exploring health literacy beyond the clinical domain, (iii) advocating for sustainability of effective programmes, and (iv) rigorous, longitudinal evaluation of health literacy. Quality research in these areas will support the meaningful and sustainable development of health literacy in Ireland, with findings that can be transferred internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health literacy research on the island of Ireland: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Maeve Murray, Stephen Behan, Craig Smith, Hannah Goss\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daaf138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Consistently, low health literacy has been found to lead to poorer health outcomes, both internationally, and in Ireland. Given this knowledge, there is a need to understand key thematic trends, methodological approaches and evidence gaps in policy and practice. Seven electronic databases (Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Scopus, PsychoINFO, and SPORTDiscus) were searched between October and December 2023 focusing on studies published in English between 2013 and 2023. Initial peer reviewed records (N  = 551) were screened resulting in 37 studies included in this review. Narrative analysis indicated that across the island of Ireland many studies had narrow populations of focus (e.g. Dublin based, adults, chronic illness populations), limited research design and methodologies (e.g. cross-sectional, narrative, and primary research with short time frames), and lacked rigorous monitoring and evaluation of health literacy as a primary or secondary outcome. Future health literacy research in Ireland should consider: (i) contextual and sociodemographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status) when aiming to improve health literacy in different populations, (ii) exploring health literacy beyond the clinical domain, (iii) advocating for sustainability of effective programmes, and (iv) rigorous, longitudinal evaluation of health literacy. Quality research in these areas will support the meaningful and sustainable development of health literacy in Ireland, with findings that can be transferred internationally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12376034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是在国际上还是在爱尔兰,卫生知识普及程度低都会导致较差的健康结果。鉴于这种认识,有必要了解政策和实践中的主要专题趋势、方法方法和证据差距。7个电子数据库(Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Scopus, PsychoINFO和SPORTDiscus)在2023年10月至12月期间进行了检索,重点是2013年至2023年期间发表的英文研究。对最初的同行评议记录(N = 551)进行筛选,最终纳入了37项研究。叙事分析表明,在整个爱尔兰岛,许多研究的重点人群范围狭窄(例如,都柏林、成年人、慢性病人群),研究设计和方法有限(例如,短时间框架的横断面、叙事和初级研究),并且缺乏对健康素养作为主要或次要结果的严格监测和评估。爱尔兰未来的健康素养研究应考虑:(i)旨在提高不同人群的健康素养时的背景和社会人口因素(年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位),(ii)探索临床领域以外的健康素养,(iii)倡导有效方案的可持续性,以及(iv)对健康素养进行严格的纵向评估。这些领域的高质量研究将支持爱尔兰卫生知识普及的有意义和可持续发展,研究结果可在国际上转让。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Health literacy research on the island of Ireland: a systematic review.

Health literacy research on the island of Ireland: a systematic review.

Consistently, low health literacy has been found to lead to poorer health outcomes, both internationally, and in Ireland. Given this knowledge, there is a need to understand key thematic trends, methodological approaches and evidence gaps in policy and practice. Seven electronic databases (Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Scopus, PsychoINFO, and SPORTDiscus) were searched between October and December 2023 focusing on studies published in English between 2013 and 2023. Initial peer reviewed records (N  = 551) were screened resulting in 37 studies included in this review. Narrative analysis indicated that across the island of Ireland many studies had narrow populations of focus (e.g. Dublin based, adults, chronic illness populations), limited research design and methodologies (e.g. cross-sectional, narrative, and primary research with short time frames), and lacked rigorous monitoring and evaluation of health literacy as a primary or secondary outcome. Future health literacy research in Ireland should consider: (i) contextual and sociodemographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status) when aiming to improve health literacy in different populations, (ii) exploring health literacy beyond the clinical domain, (iii) advocating for sustainability of effective programmes, and (iv) rigorous, longitudinal evaluation of health literacy. Quality research in these areas will support the meaningful and sustainable development of health literacy in Ireland, with findings that can be transferred internationally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信