Ji Wu, Yang Meng, Qinyao Li, Chunyin Zhang, Guohao Jiang
{"title":"[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04与[18F]FDG PET/CT检测肺癌骨转移的比较","authors":"Ji Wu, Yang Meng, Qinyao Li, Chunyin Zhang, Guohao Jiang","doi":"10.21037/qims-2025-234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone metastases of lung cancer typically indicate disease progression and poor prognosis. Early and accurate detection is crucial for staging, treatment planning, and prognostic evaluation. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of gallium 68-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor-04 ([<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04) and fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in detecting bone metastases in lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed lung cancer and clinically suspected bone metastases. These patients underwent both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging. Initially, all patient images were visually evaluated, and the diagnostic efficacy of the two imaging methods was compared at both the patient and lesion levels for detecting bone metastases from lung cancer. Additionally, a semi-quantitative analysis was performed to compare the optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) threshold and diagnostic efficacy of the two examinations for diagnosing benign and malignant bone lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 lung cancer patients were included in the study, with nine confirmed cases and 133 lesions of bone metastases. At the patient level, there were no statistically significant differences in the detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or accuracy between [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for identifying patients with bone metastases (P>0.05). At the lesion level, the detection rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting bone metastases were higher than those of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (81.37% <i>vs.</i> 57.14%, 98.50% <i>vs.</i> 69.17%, 88.24% <i>vs.</i> 34.92%, 90.68% <i>vs.</i> 70.81%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). The SUVmax of malignant bone lesions on both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT was significantly higher than those of benign bone lesions, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Moreover, the SUVmax of benign and malignant bone lesions on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was significantly higher than those on [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). In [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging, the area under the curves (AUCs) of SUVmax for diagnosing bone metastases were 0.856 and 0.724, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05); the optimal diagnostic thresholds were 5.38 and 3.77, respectively. The sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of SUVmax based on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing lung cancer bone metastases were higher than those based on [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (80.45% <i>vs.</i> 65.26%, 46.49% <i>vs.</i> 23.26%, 81.25% <i>vs.</i> 67.29%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT significantly improves the detection rate of lung cancer bone metastases at the lesion level. Additionally, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT offers superior image contrast and higher SUVmax, which also contribute to improving the accuracy of lung cancer bone metastasis diagnosis. This allows for more accurate staging of patients, enabling precise individualized treatment and improving patient prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 9","pages":"8627-8640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for detection of bone metastases of lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ji Wu, Yang Meng, Qinyao Li, Chunyin Zhang, Guohao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-2025-234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone metastases of lung cancer typically indicate disease progression and poor prognosis. Early and accurate detection is crucial for staging, treatment planning, and prognostic evaluation. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of gallium 68-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor-04 ([<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04) and fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose ([<sup>18</sup>F]FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in detecting bone metastases in lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed lung cancer and clinically suspected bone metastases. These patients underwent both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging. Initially, all patient images were visually evaluated, and the diagnostic efficacy of the two imaging methods was compared at both the patient and lesion levels for detecting bone metastases from lung cancer. Additionally, a semi-quantitative analysis was performed to compare the optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) threshold and diagnostic efficacy of the two examinations for diagnosing benign and malignant bone lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 lung cancer patients were included in the study, with nine confirmed cases and 133 lesions of bone metastases. At the patient level, there were no statistically significant differences in the detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or accuracy between [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for identifying patients with bone metastases (P>0.05). At the lesion level, the detection rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting bone metastases were higher than those of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (81.37% <i>vs.</i> 57.14%, 98.50% <i>vs.</i> 69.17%, 88.24% <i>vs.</i> 34.92%, 90.68% <i>vs.</i> 70.81%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). The SUVmax of malignant bone lesions on both [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT was significantly higher than those of benign bone lesions, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Moreover, the SUVmax of benign and malignant bone lesions on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was significantly higher than those on [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). In [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT imaging, the area under the curves (AUCs) of SUVmax for diagnosing bone metastases were 0.856 and 0.724, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05); the optimal diagnostic thresholds were 5.38 and 3.77, respectively. The sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of SUVmax based on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing lung cancer bone metastases were higher than those based on [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (80.45% <i>vs.</i> 65.26%, 46.49% <i>vs.</i> 23.26%, 81.25% <i>vs.</i> 67.29%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT significantly improves the detection rate of lung cancer bone metastases at the lesion level. Additionally, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT offers superior image contrast and higher SUVmax, which also contribute to improving the accuracy of lung cancer bone metastasis diagnosis. This allows for more accurate staging of patients, enabling precise individualized treatment and improving patient prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"8627-8640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-234\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肺癌骨转移通常表明疾病进展和预后不良。早期和准确的检测对于分期、治疗计划和预后评估至关重要。本研究旨在比较镓68标记成纤维细胞活化蛋白抑制剂-04 ([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04)和氟18标记氟脱氧葡萄糖([18F]FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)对肺癌骨转移的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析病理证实的肺癌及临床怀疑骨转移的患者。这些患者同时进行了[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04和[18F]FDG PET/CT成像。首先,对所有患者图像进行视觉评价,并在患者和病变水平上比较两种成像方法对肺癌骨转移的诊断效果。此外,我们还进行了半定量分析,比较两种检查对良恶性骨病变的最佳最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)阈值和诊断效果。结果:共纳入25例肺癌患者,确诊病例9例,骨转移病灶133例。在患者水平上,[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04与[18F]FDG PET/CT鉴别骨转移患者的检出率、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确率差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在病变水平上,[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT对骨转移的检出率、敏感性、阴性预测值、准确率均高于[18F]FDG PET/CT (81.37% vs. 57.14%、98.50% vs. 69.17%、88.24% vs. 34.92%、90.68% vs. 70.81%),差异均有统计学意义(P68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04、[18F]FDG PET/CT对骨良性病变的检出率、敏感性、阴性预测值均高于[18F]FDG PET/CT;P68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT与[18F]FDG PET/CT差异有统计学意义,P68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04与[18F]FDG PET/CT差异有统计学意义,SUVmax诊断骨转移的曲线下面积(aus)分别为0.856、0.724;(P68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT对肺癌骨转移的诊断高于基于[18F]FDG PET/CT的诊断(80.45% vs. 65.26%, 46.49% vs. 23.26%, 81.25% vs. 67.29%),差异有统计学意义(p结论:与[18F]FDG PET/CT相比,[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT在病灶水平上显著提高肺癌骨转移的检出率)。此外,[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT具有更好的图像对比度和更高的SUVmax,这也有助于提高肺癌骨转移诊断的准确性。这允许更准确的患者分期,使精确的个体化治疗和改善患者预后。
Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for detection of bone metastases of lung cancer.
Background: Bone metastases of lung cancer typically indicate disease progression and poor prognosis. Early and accurate detection is crucial for staging, treatment planning, and prognostic evaluation. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of gallium 68-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor-04 ([68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04) and fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in detecting bone metastases in lung cancer.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed lung cancer and clinically suspected bone metastases. These patients underwent both [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. Initially, all patient images were visually evaluated, and the diagnostic efficacy of the two imaging methods was compared at both the patient and lesion levels for detecting bone metastases from lung cancer. Additionally, a semi-quantitative analysis was performed to compare the optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) threshold and diagnostic efficacy of the two examinations for diagnosing benign and malignant bone lesions.
Results: A total of 25 lung cancer patients were included in the study, with nine confirmed cases and 133 lesions of bone metastases. At the patient level, there were no statistically significant differences in the detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, or accuracy between [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for identifying patients with bone metastases (P>0.05). At the lesion level, the detection rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting bone metastases were higher than those of [18F]FDG PET/CT (81.37% vs. 57.14%, 98.50% vs. 69.17%, 88.24% vs. 34.92%, 90.68% vs. 70.81%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). The SUVmax of malignant bone lesions on both [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT was significantly higher than those of benign bone lesions, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Moreover, the SUVmax of benign and malignant bone lesions on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was significantly higher than those on [18F]FDG PET/CT, with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). In [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging, the area under the curves (AUCs) of SUVmax for diagnosing bone metastases were 0.856 and 0.724, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05); the optimal diagnostic thresholds were 5.38 and 3.77, respectively. The sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of SUVmax based on [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing lung cancer bone metastases were higher than those based on [18F]FDG PET/CT (80.45% vs. 65.26%, 46.49% vs. 23.26%, 81.25% vs. 67.29%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT significantly improves the detection rate of lung cancer bone metastases at the lesion level. Additionally, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT offers superior image contrast and higher SUVmax, which also contribute to improving the accuracy of lung cancer bone metastasis diagnosis. This allows for more accurate staging of patients, enabling precise individualized treatment and improving patient prognosis.