Caibo Chen, Haitao Guan, Siyuan Shen, Pengyu Li, Kang She, Gong Cheng, Guochen Niu, Ziguang Yan, Ziping Yao, Yinghua Zou, Min Yang, Bihui Zhang
{"title":"药物包被球囊与救助支架与药物洗脱支架加药物包被球囊在跨大西洋国际学会共识C和D股腘动脉病变中的对比:倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Caibo Chen, Haitao Guan, Siyuan Shen, Pengyu Li, Kang She, Gong Cheng, Guochen Niu, Ziguang Yan, Ziping Yao, Yinghua Zou, Min Yang, Bihui Zhang","doi":"10.21037/qims-2025-367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-delivering devices have shown efficacy in clinical trials and are widely used for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, the optimal strategy for complex lesions, such as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, remains debated in real-world practice. This propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between a double-drug strategy [drug-coated balloon (DCB) combined with systemic drug-eluting stents (DES)] and a DCB bailout strategy (DCB with bailout bare-metal stents) in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included TASC C and D femoropopliteal patients treated with DCB from October 2016 to July 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:3 ratio, with one patient in the double-drug strategy group for every three in the DCB bailout group. The primary endpoint was 24-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints included freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), mortality, complications, symptom improvement, and risk factors for restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 32 pairs of patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced [standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.2 for all covariates]. Primary patency rates at 24 months were comparable (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 64.5% <i>vs.</i> 76.4%, P=0.76). Freedom from CD-TLR showed no significant difference at 24 months (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 95.8% <i>vs.</i> 79.1%, P=0.20). The double drug group demonstrated superior Rutherford category improvement (P=0.042). Mortality and complication rates were similar between groups. Dyslipidemia was identified as an independent predictor of loss of primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) =3.03, P=0.024].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The double-drug strategy and DCB bailout strategy yielded comparable 24-month patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) in TASC C and D lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 9","pages":"7727-7737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-coated balloon with bailout stenting versus drug-eluting stent plus drug-coated balloon in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D femoropopliteal lesions: a propensity score-matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Caibo Chen, Haitao Guan, Siyuan Shen, Pengyu Li, Kang She, Gong Cheng, Guochen Niu, Ziguang Yan, Ziping Yao, Yinghua Zou, Min Yang, Bihui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-2025-367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-delivering devices have shown efficacy in clinical trials and are widely used for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, the optimal strategy for complex lesions, such as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, remains debated in real-world practice. This propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between a double-drug strategy [drug-coated balloon (DCB) combined with systemic drug-eluting stents (DES)] and a DCB bailout strategy (DCB with bailout bare-metal stents) in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included TASC C and D femoropopliteal patients treated with DCB from October 2016 to July 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:3 ratio, with one patient in the double-drug strategy group for every three in the DCB bailout group. The primary endpoint was 24-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints included freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), mortality, complications, symptom improvement, and risk factors for restenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 32 pairs of patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced [standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.2 for all covariates]. Primary patency rates at 24 months were comparable (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 64.5% <i>vs.</i> 76.4%, P=0.76). Freedom from CD-TLR showed no significant difference at 24 months (double-drug <i>vs.</i> DCB bailout: 95.8% <i>vs.</i> 79.1%, P=0.20). The double drug group demonstrated superior Rutherford category improvement (P=0.042). Mortality and complication rates were similar between groups. Dyslipidemia was identified as an independent predictor of loss of primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) =3.03, P=0.024].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The double-drug strategy and DCB bailout strategy yielded comparable 24-month patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) in TASC C and D lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"7727-7737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397624/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-2025-367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drug-coated balloon with bailout stenting versus drug-eluting stent plus drug-coated balloon in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus C and D femoropopliteal lesions: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Background: Drug-delivering devices have shown efficacy in clinical trials and are widely used for femoropopliteal artery disease. However, the optimal strategy for complex lesions, such as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, remains debated in real-world practice. This propensity score-matched study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between a double-drug strategy [drug-coated balloon (DCB) combined with systemic drug-eluting stents (DES)] and a DCB bailout strategy (DCB with bailout bare-metal stents) in patients with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included TASC C and D femoropopliteal patients treated with DCB from October 2016 to July 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:3 ratio, with one patient in the double-drug strategy group for every three in the DCB bailout group. The primary endpoint was 24-month primary patency. Secondary endpoints included freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), mortality, complications, symptom improvement, and risk factors for restenosis.
Results: After PSM, 32 pairs of patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced [standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.2 for all covariates]. Primary patency rates at 24 months were comparable (double-drug vs. DCB bailout: 64.5% vs. 76.4%, P=0.76). Freedom from CD-TLR showed no significant difference at 24 months (double-drug vs. DCB bailout: 95.8% vs. 79.1%, P=0.20). The double drug group demonstrated superior Rutherford category improvement (P=0.042). Mortality and complication rates were similar between groups. Dyslipidemia was identified as an independent predictor of loss of primary patency [hazard ratio (HR) =3.03, P=0.024].
Conclusions: The double-drug strategy and DCB bailout strategy yielded comparable 24-month patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) in TASC C and D lesions.