{"title":"机器人输尿管成形术与舌粘膜移植:一个多机构的经验。","authors":"Shuaishuai Chai, Yuancheng Zhou, Manshun Dong, Gong Cheng, Wei Xiang, Yongqiang You, Qiuxuan Yu, Ruoyu Li, Chaoqi Liang, Jingdong Yuan, Xingyuan Xiao, Bing Li","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06433-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of long proximal ureteral strictures poses a significant challenge, with traditional options such as renal autotransplantation or bowel interposition associated with substantial morbidity. This study explores the use of robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosal graft (RU-LMG) as a minimally invasive approach for treating complex ureteral strictures. We present a multi-institutional cohort to evaluate its effectiveness in managing proximal and mid-ureteral strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center, retrospective study analyzed perioperative data from 76 patients who underwent RU-LMG at three institutions between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were selected based on the presence of proximal or mid-ureteral strictures not amenable to primary ureteroureterostomy due to periureteral fibrosis or excessive stricture length. Success was defined as the absence of hydronephrosis, flank pain, or imaging-confirmed obstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 76 patients, 48 (63.2%) underwent onlay ureteroplasty, while 28 (36.8%) received augmented anastomotic RU-LMG. Omental wrapping or coverage of the reconstructed ureter was performed in 73 patients (96.1%). The average length of the stricture and graft were 4.0 cm (range: 2.0-11.5 cm) and 4.1 cm (range: 2.0-12.0 cm), respectively. The mean operative time was 205.5 minutes (range: 95-380 minutes), with a mean blood loss of 70.9 mL (range: 10-400 mL). There were no open conversions or intraoperative complications. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 48 months (mean: 27 months), with a 100% success rate (76/76 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RU-LMG is a safe, effective, and feasible technique for managing complex proximal or mid-ureteral strictures, with excellent medium-term outcomes and minimal morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":"77 4","pages":"500-507"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosa graft: a multi-institutional experience.\",\"authors\":\"Shuaishuai Chai, Yuancheng Zhou, Manshun Dong, Gong Cheng, Wei Xiang, Yongqiang You, Qiuxuan Yu, Ruoyu Li, Chaoqi Liang, Jingdong Yuan, Xingyuan Xiao, Bing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06433-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of long proximal ureteral strictures poses a significant challenge, with traditional options such as renal autotransplantation or bowel interposition associated with substantial morbidity. This study explores the use of robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosal graft (RU-LMG) as a minimally invasive approach for treating complex ureteral strictures. We present a multi-institutional cohort to evaluate its effectiveness in managing proximal and mid-ureteral strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center, retrospective study analyzed perioperative data from 76 patients who underwent RU-LMG at three institutions between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were selected based on the presence of proximal or mid-ureteral strictures not amenable to primary ureteroureterostomy due to periureteral fibrosis or excessive stricture length. Success was defined as the absence of hydronephrosis, flank pain, or imaging-confirmed obstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 76 patients, 48 (63.2%) underwent onlay ureteroplasty, while 28 (36.8%) received augmented anastomotic RU-LMG. Omental wrapping or coverage of the reconstructed ureter was performed in 73 patients (96.1%). The average length of the stricture and graft were 4.0 cm (range: 2.0-11.5 cm) and 4.1 cm (range: 2.0-12.0 cm), respectively. The mean operative time was 205.5 minutes (range: 95-380 minutes), with a mean blood loss of 70.9 mL (range: 10-400 mL). There were no open conversions or intraoperative complications. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 48 months (mean: 27 months), with a 100% success rate (76/76 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RU-LMG is a safe, effective, and feasible technique for managing complex proximal or mid-ureteral strictures, with excellent medium-term outcomes and minimal morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"77 4\",\"pages\":\"500-507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06433-X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.25.06433-X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosa graft: a multi-institutional experience.
Background: The management of long proximal ureteral strictures poses a significant challenge, with traditional options such as renal autotransplantation or bowel interposition associated with substantial morbidity. This study explores the use of robotic ureteroplasty with lingual mucosal graft (RU-LMG) as a minimally invasive approach for treating complex ureteral strictures. We present a multi-institutional cohort to evaluate its effectiveness in managing proximal and mid-ureteral strictures.
Methods: This multi-center, retrospective study analyzed perioperative data from 76 patients who underwent RU-LMG at three institutions between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were selected based on the presence of proximal or mid-ureteral strictures not amenable to primary ureteroureterostomy due to periureteral fibrosis or excessive stricture length. Success was defined as the absence of hydronephrosis, flank pain, or imaging-confirmed obstruction.
Results: Of the 76 patients, 48 (63.2%) underwent onlay ureteroplasty, while 28 (36.8%) received augmented anastomotic RU-LMG. Omental wrapping or coverage of the reconstructed ureter was performed in 73 patients (96.1%). The average length of the stricture and graft were 4.0 cm (range: 2.0-11.5 cm) and 4.1 cm (range: 2.0-12.0 cm), respectively. The mean operative time was 205.5 minutes (range: 95-380 minutes), with a mean blood loss of 70.9 mL (range: 10-400 mL). There were no open conversions or intraoperative complications. The follow-up period ranged from 13 to 48 months (mean: 27 months), with a 100% success rate (76/76 patients).
Conclusions: RU-LMG is a safe, effective, and feasible technique for managing complex proximal or mid-ureteral strictures, with excellent medium-term outcomes and minimal morbidity.