多介质间接效应的假设检验。

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Statistical Methods and Applications Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7
John Kidd, Annie Green Howard, Heather M Highland, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Michael Patrick Bancks, Mercedes Carnethon, Dan-Yu Lin
{"title":"多介质间接效应的假设检验。","authors":"John Kidd, Annie Green Howard, Heather M Highland, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Michael Patrick Bancks, Mercedes Carnethon, Dan-Yu Lin","doi":"10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mediation analysis seeks to determine whether an independent variable affects a response directly or whether it does so indirectly, by way of a mediator or mediators. Scenarios that assume a single mediation are often overly simplistic, and analyses that include multiple mediators are becoming more common, particularly with the incorporation of high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, however, little attention has been given to multiple mediator and interaction effects. In this article, we propose new methods for testing the null hypothesis of no indirect effect with multiple mediators and interaction effects. We allow the estimators of the path effects to be possibly correlated; we also consider the practice of using confidence intervals to determine whether a mediation effect is zero. We compare the performance of our proposed method with existing methods through extensive simulation studies. Finally, we provide an application to data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.</p>","PeriodicalId":53154,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods and Applications","volume":"34 1","pages":"113-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypothesis Tests of Indirect Effects for Multiple Mediators.\",\"authors\":\"John Kidd, Annie Green Howard, Heather M Highland, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Michael Patrick Bancks, Mercedes Carnethon, Dan-Yu Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mediation analysis seeks to determine whether an independent variable affects a response directly or whether it does so indirectly, by way of a mediator or mediators. Scenarios that assume a single mediation are often overly simplistic, and analyses that include multiple mediators are becoming more common, particularly with the incorporation of high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, however, little attention has been given to multiple mediator and interaction effects. In this article, we propose new methods for testing the null hypothesis of no indirect effect with multiple mediators and interaction effects. We allow the estimators of the path effects to be possibly correlated; we also consider the practice of using confidence intervals to determine whether a mediation effect is zero. We compare the performance of our proposed method with existing methods through extensive simulation studies. Finally, we provide an application to data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Methods and Applications\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"113-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Methods and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-024-00777-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中介分析旨在确定一个自变量是直接影响反应,还是通过一个或多个中介间接影响反应。假设单个中介的场景通常过于简单,而包含多个中介的分析正变得越来越普遍,特别是在合并高维数据时。然而,令人惊讶的是,很少有人注意到多种介质和相互作用的影响。在本文中,我们提出了新的方法来检验无间接影响的零假设与多介质和相互作用的影响。我们允许路径效应的估计量可能是相关的;我们还考虑了使用置信区间来确定中介效应是否为零的做法。我们通过广泛的仿真研究比较了我们提出的方法与现有方法的性能。最后,我们提供了一项应用于年轻人冠状动脉风险发展(CARDIA)研究的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypothesis Tests of Indirect Effects for Multiple Mediators.

Mediation analysis seeks to determine whether an independent variable affects a response directly or whether it does so indirectly, by way of a mediator or mediators. Scenarios that assume a single mediation are often overly simplistic, and analyses that include multiple mediators are becoming more common, particularly with the incorporation of high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, however, little attention has been given to multiple mediator and interaction effects. In this article, we propose new methods for testing the null hypothesis of no indirect effect with multiple mediators and interaction effects. We allow the estimators of the path effects to be possibly correlated; we also consider the practice of using confidence intervals to determine whether a mediation effect is zero. We compare the performance of our proposed method with existing methods through extensive simulation studies. Finally, we provide an application to data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods and Applications
Statistical Methods and Applications 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods and Applications (SMA), the official Journal of the Italian Statistical Society, is an international journal aiming at promoting the development of statistical methodology and its applications in the biological, demographic, economic, health, physical, social and other scientific domains. SMA includes two sections: The first is devoted to statistical methodology and publishes original contributions in all fields of Statistics and, occasionally, critical reviews and discussions on recent developments in statistical theory and methods. The second section of the journal publishes papers devoted to original and/or innovative applications of recent statistical methodology and complex approaches of statistical data analysis. The journal is published four times a year. SMA provides a forum for the presentation of Italian and international research on methods that are of central interest to modern statistics. Discussions on methodological foundations and methods that have broad applications will be welcome and preferred.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信