在西澳大利亚性健康诊所的参与者中,皮下注射苄星青霉素G比肌肉注射更适合治疗梅毒:一项混合方法的亚研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shakayla L Walley, Jane Oliver, Stephanie L Enkel, Alice Kupara, Simon Swallow, Joseph Cotter, Gerard F Hoyne, Thel K Hla, Laurens Manning
{"title":"在西澳大利亚性健康诊所的参与者中,皮下注射苄星青霉素G比肌肉注射更适合治疗梅毒:一项混合方法的亚研究。","authors":"Shakayla L Walley, Jane Oliver, Stephanie L Enkel, Alice Kupara, Simon Swallow, Joseph Cotter, Gerard F Hoyne, Thel K Hla, Laurens Manning","doi":"10.1007/s40271-025-00764-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controlling the syphilis epidemic in Australia is a public health priority. Regular intramuscular (IM) injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) are the current standard of care for late latent syphilis in Australia; however, repeated IM BPG injections are painful, and treatment completion rates are low. Early-phase clinical trials have demonstrated the tolerability and safety of high-dose subcutaneous infusions of BPG (SCIP), where the total treatment dose can be delivered at a single visit. Here we describe the experiences and preferences of attendees of Western Australian sexual health clinics in the Perth metropolitan region who have syphilis and were treated with SCIP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed methods sub-study of a phase IIa clinical trial (ACTRN12622000349741). Eligible participants attended South Terrace Sexual Health Clinic in Fremantle, Western Australia, after referral from physicians to the South Metropolitan Health Service. Nine participants were followed up with for 24 weeks after receiving SCIP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at three time points. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent content and thematic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two themes were identified: (1) tolerance of SCIP and (2) SCIP is preferred over IM BPG. SCIP was well-tolerated by participants, who praised the ease and convenience of the procedure. Participants described instances of mild to moderate pain during and after SCIP, substantiated by self-reported pain scores and adapted Skindex-16 scores. All participants stated that they would prefer SCIP over IM BPG as syphilis treatment, and that they would be willing to receive SCIP again should re-infection occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All participants described tolerable infusion experiences with a clear preference for SCIP over IM BPG to treat syphilis. SCIP has potential to replace IM BPG in clinical practice. Further research is needed to determine the acceptability and efficacy of SCIP in diverse cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51271,"journal":{"name":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subcutaneous Infusion of Benzathine Penicillin G Is Acceptable and Preferred Over Intramuscular Injections for Syphilis in Western Australian Sexual Health Clinic Attendees: A Mixed Methods Sub-study.\",\"authors\":\"Shakayla L Walley, Jane Oliver, Stephanie L Enkel, Alice Kupara, Simon Swallow, Joseph Cotter, Gerard F Hoyne, Thel K Hla, Laurens Manning\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40271-025-00764-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controlling the syphilis epidemic in Australia is a public health priority. Regular intramuscular (IM) injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) are the current standard of care for late latent syphilis in Australia; however, repeated IM BPG injections are painful, and treatment completion rates are low. Early-phase clinical trials have demonstrated the tolerability and safety of high-dose subcutaneous infusions of BPG (SCIP), where the total treatment dose can be delivered at a single visit. Here we describe the experiences and preferences of attendees of Western Australian sexual health clinics in the Perth metropolitan region who have syphilis and were treated with SCIP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed methods sub-study of a phase IIa clinical trial (ACTRN12622000349741). Eligible participants attended South Terrace Sexual Health Clinic in Fremantle, Western Australia, after referral from physicians to the South Metropolitan Health Service. Nine participants were followed up with for 24 weeks after receiving SCIP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at three time points. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent content and thematic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two themes were identified: (1) tolerance of SCIP and (2) SCIP is preferred over IM BPG. SCIP was well-tolerated by participants, who praised the ease and convenience of the procedure. Participants described instances of mild to moderate pain during and after SCIP, substantiated by self-reported pain scores and adapted Skindex-16 scores. All participants stated that they would prefer SCIP over IM BPG as syphilis treatment, and that they would be willing to receive SCIP again should re-infection occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All participants described tolerable infusion experiences with a clear preference for SCIP over IM BPG to treat syphilis. SCIP has potential to replace IM BPG in clinical practice. Further research is needed to determine the acceptability and efficacy of SCIP in diverse cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-025-00764-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-025-00764-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在澳大利亚控制梅毒流行是一项公共卫生优先事项。在澳大利亚,定期肌内注射苄星青霉素G (BPG)是目前治疗晚潜伏梅毒的标准;然而,反复注射IM BPG是痛苦的,治疗完成率很低。早期临床试验已经证明了高剂量皮下输注BPG (SCIP)的耐受性和安全性,其中总治疗剂量可以在一次就诊中提供。在这里,我们描述了西澳大利亚性健康诊所在珀斯大都会区谁有梅毒和SCIP治疗的与会者的经验和偏好。方法:这是一项IIa期临床试验(ACTRN12622000349741)的混合方法亚研究。符合条件的参与者在医生转介到南大都会健康服务中心后,到西澳大利亚弗里曼特尔的南露台性健康诊所就诊。9名受试者在接受SCIP治疗后随访24周。半结构化访谈在三个时间点进行。所有采访都录音,逐字抄写,并进行内容和专题分析。结果:确定了两个主题:(1)SCIP的耐受性;(2)SCIP优于IM BPG。参与者对SCIP的耐受性良好,他们称赞该手术的简单和方便。参与者描述了在SCIP期间和之后轻度至中度疼痛的情况,由自我报告的疼痛评分和适应的皮肤指数-16评分证实。所有参与者都表示,他们更愿意接受SCIP而不是IM BPG作为梅毒治疗,并且如果再次发生感染,他们愿意再次接受SCIP。结论:所有参与者都描述了可耐受的输注经历,明显倾向于SCIP而不是IM BPG治疗梅毒。SCIP在临床实践中具有替代IM BPG的潜力。需要进一步的研究来确定SCIP在不同人群中的可接受性和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subcutaneous Infusion of Benzathine Penicillin G Is Acceptable and Preferred Over Intramuscular Injections for Syphilis in Western Australian Sexual Health Clinic Attendees: A Mixed Methods Sub-study.

Background: Controlling the syphilis epidemic in Australia is a public health priority. Regular intramuscular (IM) injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) are the current standard of care for late latent syphilis in Australia; however, repeated IM BPG injections are painful, and treatment completion rates are low. Early-phase clinical trials have demonstrated the tolerability and safety of high-dose subcutaneous infusions of BPG (SCIP), where the total treatment dose can be delivered at a single visit. Here we describe the experiences and preferences of attendees of Western Australian sexual health clinics in the Perth metropolitan region who have syphilis and were treated with SCIP.

Methods: This was a mixed methods sub-study of a phase IIa clinical trial (ACTRN12622000349741). Eligible participants attended South Terrace Sexual Health Clinic in Fremantle, Western Australia, after referral from physicians to the South Metropolitan Health Service. Nine participants were followed up with for 24 weeks after receiving SCIP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at three time points. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent content and thematic analyses.

Results: Two themes were identified: (1) tolerance of SCIP and (2) SCIP is preferred over IM BPG. SCIP was well-tolerated by participants, who praised the ease and convenience of the procedure. Participants described instances of mild to moderate pain during and after SCIP, substantiated by self-reported pain scores and adapted Skindex-16 scores. All participants stated that they would prefer SCIP over IM BPG as syphilis treatment, and that they would be willing to receive SCIP again should re-infection occur.

Conclusion: All participants described tolerable infusion experiences with a clear preference for SCIP over IM BPG to treat syphilis. SCIP has potential to replace IM BPG in clinical practice. Further research is needed to determine the acceptability and efficacy of SCIP in diverse cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research
Patient-Patient Centered Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Patient provides a venue for scientifically rigorous, timely, and relevant research to promote the development, evaluation and implementation of therapies, technologies, and innovations that will enhance the patient experience. It is an international forum for research that advances and/or applies qualitative or quantitative methods to promote the generation, synthesis, or interpretation of evidence. The journal has specific interest in receiving original research, reviews and commentaries related to qualitative and mixed methods research, stated-preference methods, patient reported outcomes, and shared decision making. Advances in regulatory science, patient-focused drug development, patient-centered benefit-risk and health technology assessment will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in The Patient may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances. All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信