当机器决定:探索对人工智能的信任如何塑造临床决策支持系统与护士决策后悔之间的关系:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nadia Hassan Ali Awad, Wafaa Aljohani, Mai Mohammed Yaseen, Wafaa Hassan Ali Awad, Randa Ahmed Said Ahmed Abou Elala, Heba Mohammed Alanwer Ashour
{"title":"当机器决定:探索对人工智能的信任如何塑造临床决策支持系统与护士决策后悔之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Nadia Hassan Ali Awad, Wafaa Aljohani, Mai Mohammed Yaseen, Wafaa Hassan Ali Awad, Randa Ahmed Said Ahmed Abou Elala, Heba Mohammed Alanwer Ashour","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI)-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly implemented in intensive care settings to support nurses in complex, time-sensitive decisions, aiming to improve accuracy, efficiency and patient outcomes. However, their use raises concerns about emotional consequences, particularly decision regret, which may arise when clinical judgement or outcomes are unfavourable. Trust in AI may play a key role in shaping nurses' responses to AI-guided decisions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between nurses' reliance on AI-CDSS, decision regret and trust in AI, with a focus on the moderating role of trust in the association between AI-CDSS reliance and decision regret.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational design was used. A convenience sample of 250 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses completed validated instruments: the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for AI-CDSS reliance, the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and the Trust in AI Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, multiple linear regression and moderation analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 ICU nurses participated in the study out of 400 approached, yielding a response rate of 62.5%. Nurses reported moderate levels of AI-CDSS reliance (M = 78.6, SD = 12.4), decision regret (M = 38.5, SD = 14.8) and trust in AI (M = 13.9, SD = 3.2). AI-CDSS reliance was negatively correlated with decision regret (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) and positively with trust in AI (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that both AI-CDSS reliance (β = -0.36) and trust in AI (β = -0.24) significantly predicted reduced regret (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.27, p < 0.001). Trust moderated the relationship, strengthening the negative association between reliance and regret.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater reliance on AI-CDSS is associated with lower decision regret among ICU nurses, especially when trust in AI is high. Trust enhances emotional acceptance and supports effective AI integration.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Building trust in AI-CDSS among nurses is essential for minimising emotional burden and optimising decision-making in critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Machines Decide: Exploring How Trust in AI Shapes the Relationship Between Clinical Decision Support Systems and Nurses' Decision Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Hassan Ali Awad, Wafaa Aljohani, Mai Mohammed Yaseen, Wafaa Hassan Ali Awad, Randa Ahmed Said Ahmed Abou Elala, Heba Mohammed Alanwer Ashour\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI)-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly implemented in intensive care settings to support nurses in complex, time-sensitive decisions, aiming to improve accuracy, efficiency and patient outcomes. However, their use raises concerns about emotional consequences, particularly decision regret, which may arise when clinical judgement or outcomes are unfavourable. Trust in AI may play a key role in shaping nurses' responses to AI-guided decisions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between nurses' reliance on AI-CDSS, decision regret and trust in AI, with a focus on the moderating role of trust in the association between AI-CDSS reliance and decision regret.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational design was used. A convenience sample of 250 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses completed validated instruments: the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for AI-CDSS reliance, the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and the Trust in AI Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, multiple linear regression and moderation analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 ICU nurses participated in the study out of 400 approached, yielding a response rate of 62.5%. Nurses reported moderate levels of AI-CDSS reliance (M = 78.6, SD = 12.4), decision regret (M = 38.5, SD = 14.8) and trust in AI (M = 13.9, SD = 3.2). AI-CDSS reliance was negatively correlated with decision regret (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) and positively with trust in AI (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that both AI-CDSS reliance (β = -0.36) and trust in AI (β = -0.24) significantly predicted reduced regret (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.27, p < 0.001). Trust moderated the relationship, strengthening the negative association between reliance and regret.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater reliance on AI-CDSS is associated with lower decision regret among ICU nurses, especially when trust in AI is high. Trust enhances emotional acceptance and supports effective AI integration.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Building trust in AI-CDSS among nurses is essential for minimising emotional burden and optimising decision-making in critical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"e70157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于人工智能(AI)的临床决策支持系统(AI- cdss)越来越多地应用于重症监护环境,以支持护士做出复杂的、时间敏感的决策,旨在提高准确性、效率和患者预后。然而,它们的使用引起了人们对情感后果的担忧,特别是当临床判断或结果不利时可能出现的决定后悔。对人工智能的信任可能在塑造护士对人工智能指导决策的反应方面发挥关键作用。目的:探讨护士对AI- cdss的依赖、决策后悔和对AI的信任之间的关系,重点研究信任在AI- cdss依赖和决策后悔之间的调节作用。研究设计:采用横断面相关设计。由250名重症监护室(ICU)护士组成的方便样本完成了经过验证的工具:用于AI- cdss依赖的医疗系统可用性量表(HSUS)、决策后悔量表(DRS)和对AI的信任量表。进行描述性统计、Pearson相关、多元线性回归和调节分析。结果:400名ICU护士中有250人参与了本次研究,有效率为62.5%。护士对AI- cdss的依赖程度中等(M = 78.6, SD = 12.4),决策后悔程度中等(M = 38.5, SD = 14.8),对AI的信任程度中等(M = 13.9, SD = 3.2)。结论:ICU护士对AI- cdss的依赖程度越高,其决策后悔程度越低,尤其是对AI的信任程度越高。信任可以增强情感接纳,支持有效的人工智能整合。与临床实践的相关性:在护士中建立对AI-CDSS的信任对于减少重症护理的情绪负担和优化决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Machines Decide: Exploring How Trust in AI Shapes the Relationship Between Clinical Decision Support Systems and Nurses' Decision Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly implemented in intensive care settings to support nurses in complex, time-sensitive decisions, aiming to improve accuracy, efficiency and patient outcomes. However, their use raises concerns about emotional consequences, particularly decision regret, which may arise when clinical judgement or outcomes are unfavourable. Trust in AI may play a key role in shaping nurses' responses to AI-guided decisions.

Aim: To examine the relationship between nurses' reliance on AI-CDSS, decision regret and trust in AI, with a focus on the moderating role of trust in the association between AI-CDSS reliance and decision regret.

Study design: A cross-sectional correlational design was used. A convenience sample of 250 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses completed validated instruments: the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for AI-CDSS reliance, the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and the Trust in AI Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, multiple linear regression and moderation analysis were conducted.

Results: A total of 250 ICU nurses participated in the study out of 400 approached, yielding a response rate of 62.5%. Nurses reported moderate levels of AI-CDSS reliance (M = 78.6, SD = 12.4), decision regret (M = 38.5, SD = 14.8) and trust in AI (M = 13.9, SD = 3.2). AI-CDSS reliance was negatively correlated with decision regret (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) and positively with trust in AI (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that both AI-CDSS reliance (β = -0.36) and trust in AI (β = -0.24) significantly predicted reduced regret (R2 = 0.27, p < 0.001). Trust moderated the relationship, strengthening the negative association between reliance and regret.

Conclusion: Greater reliance on AI-CDSS is associated with lower decision regret among ICU nurses, especially when trust in AI is high. Trust enhances emotional acceptance and supports effective AI integration.

Relevance to clinical practice: Building trust in AI-CDSS among nurses is essential for minimising emotional burden and optimising decision-making in critical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信