Nadia Hassan Ali Awad, Wafaa Aljohani, Mai Mohammed Yaseen, Wafaa Hassan Ali Awad, Randa Ahmed Said Ahmed Abou Elala, Heba Mohammed Alanwer Ashour
{"title":"当机器决定:探索对人工智能的信任如何塑造临床决策支持系统与护士决策后悔之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Nadia Hassan Ali Awad, Wafaa Aljohani, Mai Mohammed Yaseen, Wafaa Hassan Ali Awad, Randa Ahmed Said Ahmed Abou Elala, Heba Mohammed Alanwer Ashour","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI)-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly implemented in intensive care settings to support nurses in complex, time-sensitive decisions, aiming to improve accuracy, efficiency and patient outcomes. However, their use raises concerns about emotional consequences, particularly decision regret, which may arise when clinical judgement or outcomes are unfavourable. Trust in AI may play a key role in shaping nurses' responses to AI-guided decisions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between nurses' reliance on AI-CDSS, decision regret and trust in AI, with a focus on the moderating role of trust in the association between AI-CDSS reliance and decision regret.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational design was used. A convenience sample of 250 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses completed validated instruments: the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for AI-CDSS reliance, the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and the Trust in AI Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, multiple linear regression and moderation analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 ICU nurses participated in the study out of 400 approached, yielding a response rate of 62.5%. Nurses reported moderate levels of AI-CDSS reliance (M = 78.6, SD = 12.4), decision regret (M = 38.5, SD = 14.8) and trust in AI (M = 13.9, SD = 3.2). AI-CDSS reliance was negatively correlated with decision regret (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) and positively with trust in AI (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that both AI-CDSS reliance (β = -0.36) and trust in AI (β = -0.24) significantly predicted reduced regret (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.27, p < 0.001). Trust moderated the relationship, strengthening the negative association between reliance and regret.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater reliance on AI-CDSS is associated with lower decision regret among ICU nurses, especially when trust in AI is high. Trust enhances emotional acceptance and supports effective AI integration.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Building trust in AI-CDSS among nurses is essential for minimising emotional burden and optimising decision-making in critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Machines Decide: Exploring How Trust in AI Shapes the Relationship Between Clinical Decision Support Systems and Nurses' Decision Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Hassan Ali Awad, Wafaa Aljohani, Mai Mohammed Yaseen, Wafaa Hassan Ali Awad, Randa Ahmed Said Ahmed Abou Elala, Heba Mohammed Alanwer Ashour\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI)-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly implemented in intensive care settings to support nurses in complex, time-sensitive decisions, aiming to improve accuracy, efficiency and patient outcomes. However, their use raises concerns about emotional consequences, particularly decision regret, which may arise when clinical judgement or outcomes are unfavourable. Trust in AI may play a key role in shaping nurses' responses to AI-guided decisions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the relationship between nurses' reliance on AI-CDSS, decision regret and trust in AI, with a focus on the moderating role of trust in the association between AI-CDSS reliance and decision regret.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational design was used. A convenience sample of 250 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses completed validated instruments: the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for AI-CDSS reliance, the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and the Trust in AI Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, multiple linear regression and moderation analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 ICU nurses participated in the study out of 400 approached, yielding a response rate of 62.5%. Nurses reported moderate levels of AI-CDSS reliance (M = 78.6, SD = 12.4), decision regret (M = 38.5, SD = 14.8) and trust in AI (M = 13.9, SD = 3.2). AI-CDSS reliance was negatively correlated with decision regret (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) and positively with trust in AI (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that both AI-CDSS reliance (β = -0.36) and trust in AI (β = -0.24) significantly predicted reduced regret (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.27, p < 0.001). Trust moderated the relationship, strengthening the negative association between reliance and regret.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater reliance on AI-CDSS is associated with lower decision regret among ICU nurses, especially when trust in AI is high. Trust enhances emotional acceptance and supports effective AI integration.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Building trust in AI-CDSS among nurses is essential for minimising emotional burden and optimising decision-making in critical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"e70157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
When Machines Decide: Exploring How Trust in AI Shapes the Relationship Between Clinical Decision Support Systems and Nurses' Decision Regret: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) are increasingly implemented in intensive care settings to support nurses in complex, time-sensitive decisions, aiming to improve accuracy, efficiency and patient outcomes. However, their use raises concerns about emotional consequences, particularly decision regret, which may arise when clinical judgement or outcomes are unfavourable. Trust in AI may play a key role in shaping nurses' responses to AI-guided decisions.
Aim: To examine the relationship between nurses' reliance on AI-CDSS, decision regret and trust in AI, with a focus on the moderating role of trust in the association between AI-CDSS reliance and decision regret.
Study design: A cross-sectional correlational design was used. A convenience sample of 250 intensive care unit (ICU) nurses completed validated instruments: the Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for AI-CDSS reliance, the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and the Trust in AI Scale. Descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlations, multiple linear regression and moderation analysis were conducted.
Results: A total of 250 ICU nurses participated in the study out of 400 approached, yielding a response rate of 62.5%. Nurses reported moderate levels of AI-CDSS reliance (M = 78.6, SD = 12.4), decision regret (M = 38.5, SD = 14.8) and trust in AI (M = 13.9, SD = 3.2). AI-CDSS reliance was negatively correlated with decision regret (r = -0.42, p < 0.01) and positively with trust in AI (r = 0.51, p < 0.01). Regression analysis showed that both AI-CDSS reliance (β = -0.36) and trust in AI (β = -0.24) significantly predicted reduced regret (R2 = 0.27, p < 0.001). Trust moderated the relationship, strengthening the negative association between reliance and regret.
Conclusion: Greater reliance on AI-CDSS is associated with lower decision regret among ICU nurses, especially when trust in AI is high. Trust enhances emotional acceptance and supports effective AI integration.
Relevance to clinical practice: Building trust in AI-CDSS among nurses is essential for minimising emotional burden and optimising decision-making in critical care.
期刊介绍:
Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics.
Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories:
-research reports
-literature reviews
-developments in practice, education or management
-reflections on practice