从心脏外科手术室到重症监护病房的病人交接:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nihal Celikturk Doruker, Fatma Demir Korkmaz, Asli Sarp
{"title":"从心脏外科手术室到重症监护病房的病人交接:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Nihal Celikturk Doruker, Fatma Demir Korkmaz, Asli Sarp","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incomplete and inaccurate information transfer during the patient handover process has many risks, such as disruption of postoperative care and complications. Therefore, effective patient handover is essential.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the handover of patients from the cardiac surgery operating room to the critical care unit by examining the type of information transferred, healthcare workers' roles during handover, handover time and frequency of interruptions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a prospective observational study. The sample of this study consisted of the handover process of 85 cardiac surgery patients at a university hospital, Izmir, Turkey, between January and June 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, it was found that the cardiac surgery team gave more information about systolic/mean arterial blood pressure goals/limits (95.3%), cross-clamp time (95.3%) and surgical procedure (94.1%). The anaesthesia team provided more information about arterial blood gas results (96.5%), and recently administered antibiotics (95.3%). While the surgical residents performed 100% of the patient handovers of the cardiac surgery team, 80% of the patients were only received by the critical care physician. In the anaesthesia team, 97.6% of the patient handovers were performed by the anaesthesia residents, while 81.2% of the patients were received by the critical care physician alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the cardiac surgery team provided more information about the surgical and intraoperative procedures. The anaesthesia team provided more information about the monitoring of the patient's condition and the drugs administered. The most striking finding of the study was that few nurses were involved in most patient handovers. In line with the results of this study, it is recommended to conduct intervention studies to increase nurse participation in patient handover processes and to comparatively examine the effectiveness of handover models involving different disciplines.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This study provided a comprehensive evaluation of the handover process of cardiac surgery patients. The findings emphasise the need to establish protocols to overcome knowledge deficiencies in the patient handover process and to ensure the active participation of nurses in this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Handover From the Cardiac Surgery Operating Room to the Critical Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nihal Celikturk Doruker, Fatma Demir Korkmaz, Asli Sarp\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incomplete and inaccurate information transfer during the patient handover process has many risks, such as disruption of postoperative care and complications. Therefore, effective patient handover is essential.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the handover of patients from the cardiac surgery operating room to the critical care unit by examining the type of information transferred, healthcare workers' roles during handover, handover time and frequency of interruptions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a prospective observational study. The sample of this study consisted of the handover process of 85 cardiac surgery patients at a university hospital, Izmir, Turkey, between January and June 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, it was found that the cardiac surgery team gave more information about systolic/mean arterial blood pressure goals/limits (95.3%), cross-clamp time (95.3%) and surgical procedure (94.1%). The anaesthesia team provided more information about arterial blood gas results (96.5%), and recently administered antibiotics (95.3%). While the surgical residents performed 100% of the patient handovers of the cardiac surgery team, 80% of the patients were only received by the critical care physician. In the anaesthesia team, 97.6% of the patient handovers were performed by the anaesthesia residents, while 81.2% of the patients were received by the critical care physician alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the cardiac surgery team provided more information about the surgical and intraoperative procedures. The anaesthesia team provided more information about the monitoring of the patient's condition and the drugs administered. The most striking finding of the study was that few nurses were involved in most patient handovers. In line with the results of this study, it is recommended to conduct intervention studies to increase nurse participation in patient handover processes and to comparatively examine the effectiveness of handover models involving different disciplines.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This study provided a comprehensive evaluation of the handover process of cardiac surgery patients. The findings emphasise the need to establish protocols to overcome knowledge deficiencies in the patient handover process and to ensure the active participation of nurses in this process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"e70154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者交接过程中信息传递不完整、不准确会带来术后护理中断、并发症等诸多风险。因此,有效的病人交接至关重要。目的:本研究旨在通过考察患者从心脏外科手术室到重症监护病房的转移信息类型、转移过程中医护人员的角色、转移时间和中断频率来评估患者从心脏外科手术室到重症监护病房的转移。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性观察研究。本研究的样本包括2023年1月至6月在土耳其伊兹密尔一所大学医院进行的85例心脏手术患者的交接过程。结果:在本研究中,心脏外科团队提供了更多关于收缩压/平均动脉血压目标/限值(95.3%),交叉钳夹时间(95.3%)和手术方法(94.1%)的信息。麻醉小组提供了更多关于动脉血气结果的信息(96.5%),以及最近使用的抗生素(95.3%)。虽然外科住院医师完成了心脏外科团队100%的患者移交,但80%的患者仅由重症监护医师接收。在麻醉组,97.6%的病人移交是由麻醉住院医师完成的,而81.2%的病人移交是由重症监护医师单独完成的。结论:本研究发现心脏外科团队提供了更多关于手术和术中操作的信息。麻醉小组提供了更多关于病人病情监测和药物使用的信息。这项研究最引人注目的发现是,很少有护士参与大多数病人的移交。根据本研究结果,建议开展干预研究,提高护士在病人交接过程中的参与度,并比较检验不同学科交接模式的有效性。与临床实践的相关性:本研究对心脏手术患者的交接过程进行了全面的评估。研究结果强调需要建立协议,以克服患者交接过程中的知识缺陷,并确保护士积极参与这一过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Handover From the Cardiac Surgery Operating Room to the Critical Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background: Incomplete and inaccurate information transfer during the patient handover process has many risks, such as disruption of postoperative care and complications. Therefore, effective patient handover is essential.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the handover of patients from the cardiac surgery operating room to the critical care unit by examining the type of information transferred, healthcare workers' roles during handover, handover time and frequency of interruptions.

Study design: This is a prospective observational study. The sample of this study consisted of the handover process of 85 cardiac surgery patients at a university hospital, Izmir, Turkey, between January and June 2023.

Results: In this study, it was found that the cardiac surgery team gave more information about systolic/mean arterial blood pressure goals/limits (95.3%), cross-clamp time (95.3%) and surgical procedure (94.1%). The anaesthesia team provided more information about arterial blood gas results (96.5%), and recently administered antibiotics (95.3%). While the surgical residents performed 100% of the patient handovers of the cardiac surgery team, 80% of the patients were only received by the critical care physician. In the anaesthesia team, 97.6% of the patient handovers were performed by the anaesthesia residents, while 81.2% of the patients were received by the critical care physician alone.

Conclusions: This study found that the cardiac surgery team provided more information about the surgical and intraoperative procedures. The anaesthesia team provided more information about the monitoring of the patient's condition and the drugs administered. The most striking finding of the study was that few nurses were involved in most patient handovers. In line with the results of this study, it is recommended to conduct intervention studies to increase nurse participation in patient handover processes and to comparatively examine the effectiveness of handover models involving different disciplines.

Relevance to clinical practice: This study provided a comprehensive evaluation of the handover process of cardiac surgery patients. The findings emphasise the need to establish protocols to overcome knowledge deficiencies in the patient handover process and to ensure the active participation of nurses in this process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信