Originalbeiträge(原版).精神病患者的手术精神动力学诊断(OPD-3):可行性和差分可靠性。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Valentin Lackmann, Miriam Henkel, Cord Benecke, Claudia Kozik, Knut Schnell, Christian Fricke-Neef, Bettina Mardus, Martin Ohlmeier, Dorothea von Haebler, Christian Sell
{"title":"Originalbeiträge(原版).精神病患者的手术精神动力学诊断(OPD-3):可行性和差分可靠性。","authors":"Valentin Lackmann, Miriam Henkel, Cord Benecke, Claudia Kozik, Knut Schnell, Christian Fricke-Neef, Bettina Mardus, Martin Ohlmeier, Dorothea von Haebler, Christian Sell","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2025.71.3.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the feasibility and differential inter-rater reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) for patients experiencing psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted OPD interviews with n₁ = 40 patients with SCID-diagnosed nonpsychotic disorders and n₂ = 40 patients with non-affective or affective psychoses. Each patient's video-recorded interview was independently rated by two trained OPD-3 raters, selected from a rater pool of five. We assessed feasibility based on extensive rater discussions and consultations with expert practitioners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OPD-based diagnostic assessment of individual psychodynamic patient characteristics with OPD-3 has proven feasible for patients with psychosis. Due to particularities of this patient group, some aspects of the rating necessitate specific attention during rater training. OPD-3 shows moderate to excellent inter-rater reliabilities for patients with psychosis with only minor differences to patients without psychosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OPD-3 is a clinically applicable and reliable instrument for psychodynamic diagnosis in patients with psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"71 3","pages":"225-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Originalbeiträge (Originals). Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD-3) for Patients with Psychosis: Feasibility and Differential Reliability / Operationalisierte Psychodynamischen Diagnostik 3 (OPD-3) bei Patient:innen mit Psychose: Anwendbarkeit und differenzielle Reliabilität.\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Lackmann, Miriam Henkel, Cord Benecke, Claudia Kozik, Knut Schnell, Christian Fricke-Neef, Bettina Mardus, Martin Ohlmeier, Dorothea von Haebler, Christian Sell\",\"doi\":\"10.13109/zptm.2025.71.3.225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the feasibility and differential inter-rater reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) for patients experiencing psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted OPD interviews with n₁ = 40 patients with SCID-diagnosed nonpsychotic disorders and n₂ = 40 patients with non-affective or affective psychoses. Each patient's video-recorded interview was independently rated by two trained OPD-3 raters, selected from a rater pool of five. We assessed feasibility based on extensive rater discussions and consultations with expert practitioners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OPD-based diagnostic assessment of individual psychodynamic patient characteristics with OPD-3 has proven feasible for patients with psychosis. Due to particularities of this patient group, some aspects of the rating necessitate specific attention during rater training. OPD-3 shows moderate to excellent inter-rater reliabilities for patients with psychosis with only minor differences to patients without psychosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OPD-3 is a clinically applicable and reliable instrument for psychodynamic diagnosis in patients with psychosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie\",\"volume\":\"71 3\",\"pages\":\"225-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2025.71.3.225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2025.71.3.225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨操作性心理动力学诊断3 (OPD-3)在精神病患者诊断中的可行性和差异信度。方法:对40例scid诊断为非精神病性障碍患者和40例非情感性或情感性精神病患者进行门诊访谈。每位患者的视频访谈由两名训练有素的OPD-3评分者独立评分,他们是从五名评分者中挑选出来的。我们在广泛的讨论和咨询专家的基础上评估了可行性。结果:基于opd的个体心理动力学患者特征诊断评估与OPD-3已被证明对精神病患者是可行的。由于这一患者群体的特殊性,在评估员培训过程中,评估的某些方面需要特别注意。OPD-3在精神病患者中表现出中等至优异的评分间信度,与非精神病患者的差异较小。结论:OPD-3是一种临床适用、可靠的精神病患者心理动力学诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Originalbeiträge (Originals). Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD-3) for Patients with Psychosis: Feasibility and Differential Reliability / Operationalisierte Psychodynamischen Diagnostik 3 (OPD-3) bei Patient:innen mit Psychose: Anwendbarkeit und differenzielle Reliabilität.

Objective: This study examines the feasibility and differential inter-rater reliability of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis 3 (OPD-3) for patients experiencing psychosis.

Method: We conducted OPD interviews with n₁ = 40 patients with SCID-diagnosed nonpsychotic disorders and n₂ = 40 patients with non-affective or affective psychoses. Each patient's video-recorded interview was independently rated by two trained OPD-3 raters, selected from a rater pool of five. We assessed feasibility based on extensive rater discussions and consultations with expert practitioners.

Results: OPD-based diagnostic assessment of individual psychodynamic patient characteristics with OPD-3 has proven feasible for patients with psychosis. Due to particularities of this patient group, some aspects of the rating necessitate specific attention during rater training. OPD-3 shows moderate to excellent inter-rater reliabilities for patients with psychosis with only minor differences to patients without psychosis.

Conclusion: OPD-3 is a clinically applicable and reliable instrument for psychodynamic diagnosis in patients with psychosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信