评估急诊科的交接质量:用交接CEX意大利量表评估EMS和分诊护士之间的沟通。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Flavio Gheri, Clarissa Presti, Fabio Donnarumma, Domenica Petta
{"title":"评估急诊科的交接质量:用交接CEX意大利量表评估EMS和分诊护士之间的沟通。","authors":"Flavio Gheri, Clarissa Presti, Fabio Donnarumma, Domenica Petta","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient handover is a crucial process that ensures the transfer of essential patient information from prehospital teams to hospital staff. Although these risks are widely recognized, significant variability persists in handover practices in health care settings. This highlights the need for robust, evidence-based strategies to standardize the process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective and descriptive study of a single-center design was implemented to evaluate the quality of handover between emergency medical personnel and clinical nurses within the emergency department using the validated Handoff Clinical Evaluation Exercise (CEX) Italian scale. The study used this scale in evaluating 6 distinct domains: organization/efficiency, mnemonic structures employed by health care professionals, communication skills, completeness of clinical information, treatments performed, and professional qualities manifested during handover.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 health care professionals participated in the study: 51 triage nurses and 62 emergency personnel, including physicians and nurses. Of 154 handover transactions, 84 interruptions (54.5%) occurred: 38.3% caused by health care professionals and 16.2% by others, such as patients, family members, administrative staff, etc. The results highlighted statistically significant differences in information transfer between emergency medical services personnel and triage nurses, with the latter generally receiving higher evaluations. The receiver group obtained better evaluations in all the variables analyzed than the providers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides a significant contribution to understanding a crucial communication process in critical patient management, laying the foundations for future studies that can explore strategies to improve handover in similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Handover Quality in the Emergency Department: Evaluating Communication Between EMS and Triage Nurses Using the Handoff CEX Italian Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Flavio Gheri, Clarissa Presti, Fabio Donnarumma, Domenica Petta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient handover is a crucial process that ensures the transfer of essential patient information from prehospital teams to hospital staff. Although these risks are widely recognized, significant variability persists in handover practices in health care settings. This highlights the need for robust, evidence-based strategies to standardize the process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective and descriptive study of a single-center design was implemented to evaluate the quality of handover between emergency medical personnel and clinical nurses within the emergency department using the validated Handoff Clinical Evaluation Exercise (CEX) Italian scale. The study used this scale in evaluating 6 distinct domains: organization/efficiency, mnemonic structures employed by health care professionals, communication skills, completeness of clinical information, treatments performed, and professional qualities manifested during handover.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 health care professionals participated in the study: 51 triage nurses and 62 emergency personnel, including physicians and nurses. Of 154 handover transactions, 84 interruptions (54.5%) occurred: 38.3% caused by health care professionals and 16.2% by others, such as patients, family members, administrative staff, etc. The results highlighted statistically significant differences in information transfer between emergency medical services personnel and triage nurses, with the latter generally receiving higher evaluations. The receiver group obtained better evaluations in all the variables analyzed than the providers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides a significant contribution to understanding a crucial communication process in critical patient management, laying the foundations for future studies that can explore strategies to improve handover in similar settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者交接是确保院前团队向医院工作人员传递基本患者信息的关键过程。虽然这些风险被广泛认识,但在卫生保健机构的交接实践中仍然存在显著的差异。这突出表明需要强有力的、以证据为基础的战略来使这一过程标准化。方法:采用单中心设计的前瞻性和描述性研究,采用经过验证的交接临床评估练习(CEX)意大利量表,评估急诊科急诊医务人员与临床护士之间的交接质量。该研究使用该量表来评估6个不同的领域:组织/效率,卫生保健专业人员使用的记忆结构,沟通技巧,临床信息的完整性,所进行的治疗和在移交过程中表现出的专业素质。结果:共有112名卫生保健专业人员参与了这项研究:51名分诊护士和62名急救人员,包括医生和护士。在154笔交接交易中,发生了84次中断(54.5%),其中38.3%是卫生保健专业人员造成的,16.2%是其他人造成的,如患者、家属、行政人员等。结果显示,急诊医疗服务人员和分诊护士之间的信息传递存在统计学上的显著差异,后者通常获得更高的评价。接受治疗组在分析的所有变量中都比提供治疗组获得更好的评价。讨论:本研究为理解危重患者管理中关键的沟通过程提供了重要贡献,为未来的研究奠定了基础,可以探索在类似环境下改善交接的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Handover Quality in the Emergency Department: Evaluating Communication Between EMS and Triage Nurses Using the Handoff CEX Italian Scale.

Introduction: Patient handover is a crucial process that ensures the transfer of essential patient information from prehospital teams to hospital staff. Although these risks are widely recognized, significant variability persists in handover practices in health care settings. This highlights the need for robust, evidence-based strategies to standardize the process.

Methods: A prospective and descriptive study of a single-center design was implemented to evaluate the quality of handover between emergency medical personnel and clinical nurses within the emergency department using the validated Handoff Clinical Evaluation Exercise (CEX) Italian scale. The study used this scale in evaluating 6 distinct domains: organization/efficiency, mnemonic structures employed by health care professionals, communication skills, completeness of clinical information, treatments performed, and professional qualities manifested during handover.

Results: A total of 112 health care professionals participated in the study: 51 triage nurses and 62 emergency personnel, including physicians and nurses. Of 154 handover transactions, 84 interruptions (54.5%) occurred: 38.3% caused by health care professionals and 16.2% by others, such as patients, family members, administrative staff, etc. The results highlighted statistically significant differences in information transfer between emergency medical services personnel and triage nurses, with the latter generally receiving higher evaluations. The receiver group obtained better evaluations in all the variables analyzed than the providers.

Discussion: This study provides a significant contribution to understanding a crucial communication process in critical patient management, laying the foundations for future studies that can explore strategies to improve handover in similar settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信