专家定义的初级保健扫盲促进的预期结果和核心组成部分。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Lilian Mekhail, Rylee Sant'Angelo, Jennifer C Dillon, Juline Hanna, Usha Ramachandran, Maria B Pellerano, Nikki Shearman, Alan L Mendelsohn, Thomas I Mackie, Manuel E Jimenez
{"title":"专家定义的初级保健扫盲促进的预期结果和核心组成部分。","authors":"Lilian Mekhail, Rylee Sant'Angelo, Jennifer C Dillon, Juline Hanna, Usha Ramachandran, Maria B Pellerano, Nikki Shearman, Alan L Mendelsohn, Thomas I Mackie, Manuel E Jimenez","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary care-based literacy promotion enhances caregiver-child shared reading and child language outcomes, yet variation in implementation may dilute its impact. This study examines expert perspectives on intended outcomes of literacy promotion, as well as its core components, those necessary to achieve intended outcomes, and components that are recommended but adaptable to context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We purposively sampled healthcare and policy experts in primary care-based literacy promotion from the U.S. and Canada for online, in-depth interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed iteratively engaging emergent and a priori codes based on the COmponents and Rationales for Effectiveness Fidelity Method and the team's prior work to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We achieved saturation after 22 interviews with 24 participants (16 U.S. participants, 8 Canadian). We identified four themes: 1) Traditionally, literacy promotion focused on enhancing preliteracy skills and school readiness. Over time, this outcome has evolved to include fostering early relational health as a foundational goal; 2) Core components include a trusted clinician delivering a strength-based, family-centered message, while modeling developmentally-informed shared reading; 3) Components that are adaptable to setting and context include literacy-rich clinical environments and community resource referrals; 4) Experts diverged on whether providing a children's book during literacy promotion is essential, but there was congruence that book provision alone is insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experts identified strength-based, family-centered guidance from a trusted clinician with developmentally-focused modeling as core to support intended outcomes of early relational health and school readiness. This understanding can inform training and healthcare improvement activities aimed at optimizing primary care-based literacy promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intended Outcomes and Core Components of Primary Care-Based Literacy Promotion as Defined by Experts.\",\"authors\":\"Lilian Mekhail, Rylee Sant'Angelo, Jennifer C Dillon, Juline Hanna, Usha Ramachandran, Maria B Pellerano, Nikki Shearman, Alan L Mendelsohn, Thomas I Mackie, Manuel E Jimenez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2025.103141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary care-based literacy promotion enhances caregiver-child shared reading and child language outcomes, yet variation in implementation may dilute its impact. This study examines expert perspectives on intended outcomes of literacy promotion, as well as its core components, those necessary to achieve intended outcomes, and components that are recommended but adaptable to context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We purposively sampled healthcare and policy experts in primary care-based literacy promotion from the U.S. and Canada for online, in-depth interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed iteratively engaging emergent and a priori codes based on the COmponents and Rationales for Effectiveness Fidelity Method and the team's prior work to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We achieved saturation after 22 interviews with 24 participants (16 U.S. participants, 8 Canadian). We identified four themes: 1) Traditionally, literacy promotion focused on enhancing preliteracy skills and school readiness. Over time, this outcome has evolved to include fostering early relational health as a foundational goal; 2) Core components include a trusted clinician delivering a strength-based, family-centered message, while modeling developmentally-informed shared reading; 3) Components that are adaptable to setting and context include literacy-rich clinical environments and community resource referrals; 4) Experts diverged on whether providing a children's book during literacy promotion is essential, but there was congruence that book provision alone is insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experts identified strength-based, family-centered guidance from a trusted clinician with developmentally-focused modeling as core to support intended outcomes of early relational health and school readiness. This understanding can inform training and healthcare improvement activities aimed at optimizing primary care-based literacy promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"103141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103141\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.103141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以初级保健为基础的扫盲促进提高了照顾者与儿童共同阅读和儿童语言的结果,但实施的差异可能会削弱其影响。本研究考察了专家对扫盲促进的预期结果、其核心组成部分、实现预期结果所必需的组成部分以及建议但可根据具体情况进行调整的组成部分的观点。方法:我们有目的地从美国和加拿大的初级保健扫盲促进中抽取医疗保健和政策专家进行在线深度访谈。访谈被记录下来,逐字抄写,并根据有效性保真方法的组成部分和基本原理以及团队先前的工作来确定主题,迭代地分析突发和先验代码。结果:我们对24名参与者(16名美国参与者,8名加拿大参与者)进行了22次访谈后达到饱和。我们确定了四个主题:1)传统上,扫盲促进侧重于提高识字前技能和入学准备。随着时间的推移,这一结果已经演变为包括促进早期关系健康作为一个基本目标;2)核心组件包括值得信赖的临床医生提供基于力量的,以家庭为中心的信息,同时模拟发展知情的共享阅读;3)适应环境和背景的组成部分包括丰富的识字临床环境和社区资源转诊;专家们对在扫盲推广期间提供儿童书籍是否必要存在分歧,但一致认为仅提供书籍是不够的。结论:专家们从一位值得信赖的临床医生那里确定了以力量为基础、以家庭为中心的指导,以发展为中心的建模为核心,以支持早期关系健康和入学准备的预期结果。这种理解可以为旨在优化以初级保健为基础的扫盲推广的培训和保健改进活动提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intended Outcomes and Core Components of Primary Care-Based Literacy Promotion as Defined by Experts.

Objective: Primary care-based literacy promotion enhances caregiver-child shared reading and child language outcomes, yet variation in implementation may dilute its impact. This study examines expert perspectives on intended outcomes of literacy promotion, as well as its core components, those necessary to achieve intended outcomes, and components that are recommended but adaptable to context.

Methods: We purposively sampled healthcare and policy experts in primary care-based literacy promotion from the U.S. and Canada for online, in-depth interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed iteratively engaging emergent and a priori codes based on the COmponents and Rationales for Effectiveness Fidelity Method and the team's prior work to identify themes.

Results: We achieved saturation after 22 interviews with 24 participants (16 U.S. participants, 8 Canadian). We identified four themes: 1) Traditionally, literacy promotion focused on enhancing preliteracy skills and school readiness. Over time, this outcome has evolved to include fostering early relational health as a foundational goal; 2) Core components include a trusted clinician delivering a strength-based, family-centered message, while modeling developmentally-informed shared reading; 3) Components that are adaptable to setting and context include literacy-rich clinical environments and community resource referrals; 4) Experts diverged on whether providing a children's book during literacy promotion is essential, but there was congruence that book provision alone is insufficient.

Conclusion: Experts identified strength-based, family-centered guidance from a trusted clinician with developmentally-focused modeling as core to support intended outcomes of early relational health and school readiness. This understanding can inform training and healthcare improvement activities aimed at optimizing primary care-based literacy promotion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信