过去和现在:伞式变量掩盖了美国城市环境中结构性种族主义的时间机制。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Critical Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1080/09581596.2025.2492798
Victoria Fisher, Allison Boretsky, Nicole Alkhouri, Nadia N Abuelezam
{"title":"过去和现在:伞式变量掩盖了美国城市环境中结构性种族主义的时间机制。","authors":"Victoria Fisher, Allison Boretsky, Nicole Alkhouri, Nadia N Abuelezam","doi":"10.1080/09581596.2025.2492798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racist urban development policies and capitalist municipal management have continued the cycle of poverty experienced by many in the US. Modeling this disadvantage often relies on composite, or \"umbrella\", socioeconomic variables. We argue that this approach obfuscates the temporal nature of social determinants. We propose organizing downstream consequences of structural racism by exposure duration-historical disenfranchisement and contemporary disadvantage-to assess their differential effect on excess all-cause mortality in an U.S. urban environment during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ZIP-code tabulation area (ZCTA) 2020 and 2021 demographics were used to create an historical disenfranchisement index, a contemporary disadvantage index, and combined index (our proxy for a \"umbrella\" variable) for 210 ZCTAs in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. Indices were dichotomized into \"above\" and \"below\" average, as well as a quadrant matrix index categorizing ZCTAs by \"above average\" in both, one index only, or neither. General linear models assessed the relationship between the indices and excess all-cause mortality. Model fit was compared by AIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all models, ZCTAs that experienced above average structural racism had significantly greater excess all-cause mortality than those with below average structural racism markers. The quadrant model (AIC = 3441) performed significantly better than the combined index (AIC = 3468.3) with a reduction in AIC of 27.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Composite metrics of disadvantage may mask important distinctions in how mechanisms of structural racism are associated with health outcomes. This analysis provides support for place-based, historically sensitive health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51469,"journal":{"name":"Critical Public Health","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Then And Now: Umbrella Variables Mask Temporal Mechanisms Of Structural Racism In US Urban Environments.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Fisher, Allison Boretsky, Nicole Alkhouri, Nadia N Abuelezam\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09581596.2025.2492798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racist urban development policies and capitalist municipal management have continued the cycle of poverty experienced by many in the US. Modeling this disadvantage often relies on composite, or \\\"umbrella\\\", socioeconomic variables. We argue that this approach obfuscates the temporal nature of social determinants. We propose organizing downstream consequences of structural racism by exposure duration-historical disenfranchisement and contemporary disadvantage-to assess their differential effect on excess all-cause mortality in an U.S. urban environment during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ZIP-code tabulation area (ZCTA) 2020 and 2021 demographics were used to create an historical disenfranchisement index, a contemporary disadvantage index, and combined index (our proxy for a \\\"umbrella\\\" variable) for 210 ZCTAs in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. Indices were dichotomized into \\\"above\\\" and \\\"below\\\" average, as well as a quadrant matrix index categorizing ZCTAs by \\\"above average\\\" in both, one index only, or neither. General linear models assessed the relationship between the indices and excess all-cause mortality. Model fit was compared by AIC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all models, ZCTAs that experienced above average structural racism had significantly greater excess all-cause mortality than those with below average structural racism markers. The quadrant model (AIC = 3441) performed significantly better than the combined index (AIC = 3468.3) with a reduction in AIC of 27.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Composite metrics of disadvantage may mask important distinctions in how mechanisms of structural racism are associated with health outcomes. This analysis provides support for place-based, historically sensitive health research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Public Health\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2492798\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2492798","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种族主义的城市发展政策和资本主义的市政管理延续了美国许多人经历的贫困循环。对这一劣势的建模通常依赖于复合的或“保护伞”的社会经济变量。我们认为,这种方法混淆了社会决定因素的时间性质。我们建议通过暴露时间(历史上的剥夺选举权和当代的不利地位)来组织结构性种族主义的下游后果,以评估它们对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间美国城市环境中高全因死亡率的差异影响。方法:利用邮政编码制表区(ZCTA) 2020年和2021年的人口统计数据,为堪萨斯城大都市区210个ZCTA创建历史剥夺公民权指数、当代劣势指数和综合指数(我们的“保护伞”变量代理)。指数被分为“高于”和“低于”平均值,以及一个象限矩阵指数,将zcta按两个指标的“高于”、一个指标或两个指标的“高于”进行分类。一般线性模型评估了指数与超额全因死亡率之间的关系。采用AIC比较模型拟合。结果:在所有模型中,经历过高于平均水平结构性种族主义的zcta的全因死亡率明显高于低于平均水平结构性种族主义标记的zcta。象限模型(AIC = 3441)的表现明显优于联合指数(AIC = 3468.3), AIC降低27.2。结论:劣势的综合指标可能掩盖了结构性种族主义机制与健康结果之间的重要区别。这一分析为基于地点的、具有历史敏感性的卫生研究提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Then And Now: Umbrella Variables Mask Temporal Mechanisms Of Structural Racism In US Urban Environments.

Introduction: Racist urban development policies and capitalist municipal management have continued the cycle of poverty experienced by many in the US. Modeling this disadvantage often relies on composite, or "umbrella", socioeconomic variables. We argue that this approach obfuscates the temporal nature of social determinants. We propose organizing downstream consequences of structural racism by exposure duration-historical disenfranchisement and contemporary disadvantage-to assess their differential effect on excess all-cause mortality in an U.S. urban environment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: ZIP-code tabulation area (ZCTA) 2020 and 2021 demographics were used to create an historical disenfranchisement index, a contemporary disadvantage index, and combined index (our proxy for a "umbrella" variable) for 210 ZCTAs in the Kansas City Metropolitan Area. Indices were dichotomized into "above" and "below" average, as well as a quadrant matrix index categorizing ZCTAs by "above average" in both, one index only, or neither. General linear models assessed the relationship between the indices and excess all-cause mortality. Model fit was compared by AIC.

Results: Across all models, ZCTAs that experienced above average structural racism had significantly greater excess all-cause mortality than those with below average structural racism markers. The quadrant model (AIC = 3441) performed significantly better than the combined index (AIC = 3468.3) with a reduction in AIC of 27.2.

Conclusion: Composite metrics of disadvantage may mask important distinctions in how mechanisms of structural racism are associated with health outcomes. This analysis provides support for place-based, historically sensitive health research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Critical Public Health (CPH) is a respected peer-review journal for researchers and practitioners working in public health, health promotion and related fields. It brings together international scholarship to provide critical analyses of theory and practice, reviews of literature and explorations of new ways of working. The journal publishes high quality work that is open and critical in perspective and which reports on current research and debates in the field. CPH encourages an interdisciplinary focus and features innovative analyses. It is committed to exploring and debating issues of equity and social justice; in particular, issues of sexism, racism and other forms of oppression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信