改进养老院中认知障碍老年人跌倒风险评估量表:Mokken分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yuan Luo, Xiaoni Chai, Haiye Ran, Yuqian Deng, Jiaxin Liu, Liping Zhao
{"title":"改进养老院中认知障碍老年人跌倒风险评估量表:Mokken分析。","authors":"Yuan Luo, Xiaoni Chai, Haiye Ran, Yuqian Deng, Jiaxin Liu, Liping Zhao","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To refine fall risk assessment scale among older adults with cognitive impairment in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mokken analysis was conducted to refine the assessment scale based on unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, dimensionality, and reliability. Data were gathered from cognitively impaired older adults in a nursing home from January to February 2023. Trained nursing assistants conducted face-to-face assessments and reviewed medical records to administer the scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emotion and State Dimension did not meet unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.14), particularly item Q9, which also violated local independence. Monotonicity analysis showed all items exhibited monotonic increases. After refinement at c = 0.3, the scale consists of nine items. With increasing c-values, the first seven items were ultimately retained to form the final version of the scale. Both optimised scales (9-item and 7-item) satisfied reliability requirements, with all coefficients (Cronbach's α, Guttman's lambda-2, Molenaar-Sijtsma, Latent Class Reliability Coefficient) ≥ 0.74.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale is suitable for assessing fall risk among older adults with cognitive impairment, with a unidimensional scale of the first seven items recommended for practical use. Future efforts should refine the scale by exploring additional risk factors, especially emotion-related ones.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>The refined 7-item scale provides nursing home staff with a practical, reliable tool for assessing fall risk in cognitively impaired older adults, enabling targeted prevention strategies to enhance safety and reduce injuries.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The refined 7-item scale provides nursing home staff with a reliable, practical, and scientifically validated tool specifically designed for assessing fall risk in older adults with cognitive impairment. Its simplicity enables efficient integration into routine clinical workflows, empowering caregivers to proactively identify risk factors and implement timely, targeted interventions. This approach directly enhances resident safety by translating assessment results into actionable prevention strategies within daily care practices.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining Fall Risk Assessment Scale for Nursing Homes Among Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Mokken Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Luo, Xiaoni Chai, Haiye Ran, Yuqian Deng, Jiaxin Liu, Liping Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.70095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To refine fall risk assessment scale among older adults with cognitive impairment in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mokken analysis was conducted to refine the assessment scale based on unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, dimensionality, and reliability. Data were gathered from cognitively impaired older adults in a nursing home from January to February 2023. Trained nursing assistants conducted face-to-face assessments and reviewed medical records to administer the scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emotion and State Dimension did not meet unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.14), particularly item Q9, which also violated local independence. Monotonicity analysis showed all items exhibited monotonic increases. After refinement at c = 0.3, the scale consists of nine items. With increasing c-values, the first seven items were ultimately retained to form the final version of the scale. Both optimised scales (9-item and 7-item) satisfied reliability requirements, with all coefficients (Cronbach's α, Guttman's lambda-2, Molenaar-Sijtsma, Latent Class Reliability Coefficient) ≥ 0.74.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scale is suitable for assessing fall risk among older adults with cognitive impairment, with a unidimensional scale of the first seven items recommended for practical use. Future efforts should refine the scale by exploring additional risk factors, especially emotion-related ones.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and patient care: </strong>The refined 7-item scale provides nursing home staff with a practical, reliable tool for assessing fall risk in cognitively impaired older adults, enabling targeted prevention strategies to enhance safety and reduce injuries.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The refined 7-item scale provides nursing home staff with a reliable, practical, and scientifically validated tool specifically designed for assessing fall risk in older adults with cognitive impairment. Its simplicity enables efficient integration into routine clinical workflows, empowering caregivers to proactively identify risk factors and implement timely, targeted interventions. This approach directly enhances resident safety by translating assessment results into actionable prevention strategies within daily care practices.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70095\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:完善养老院老年认知障碍患者跌倒风险评估量表。设计:横断面调查。方法:采用Mokken分析法,从单维性、局部独立性、单调性、维度性、信度等方面对量表进行细化。数据收集自一家养老院的认知受损老年人,时间为2023年1月至2月。训练有素的护理助理进行面对面评估,并审查医疗记录,以管理该量表。结果:情绪维度和状态维度不符合单维度标准(H = 0.14),尤其是Q9项也违反了局部独立性。单调性分析表明,所有项目均呈现单调性增长。在c = 0.3细化后,量表由9个项目组成。随着c值的增加,前七个项目最终被保留,形成最终版本的量表。优化后的量表(9项和7项)均满足信度要求,所有系数(Cronbach’s α、Guttman’s lambda-2、Molenaar-Sijtsma、潜在类信度系数)均≥0.74。结论:该量表适用于评估老年人认知障碍患者的跌倒风险,建议采用前7项的单维量表进行实际应用。未来的努力应该通过探索额外的风险因素,特别是与情绪相关的因素来完善量表。对专业和患者护理的启示:经过改进的7项量表为养老院工作人员提供了一个实用、可靠的工具,用于评估认知障碍老年人的跌倒风险,从而实现有针对性的预防策略,以提高安全性并减少伤害。影响:完善的7项量表为养老院工作人员提供了一个可靠、实用、科学有效的工具,专门用于评估有认知障碍的老年人跌倒风险。它的简单性使其能够有效地整合到常规临床工作流程中,使护理人员能够主动识别风险因素并及时实施有针对性的干预措施。这种方法通过将评估结果转化为日常护理实践中可操作的预防策略,直接提高了居民的安全。报告方法:本研究按照STROBE指南报道。患者或公众捐赠:无患者或公众捐赠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining Fall Risk Assessment Scale for Nursing Homes Among Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Mokken Analysis.

Aim: To refine fall risk assessment scale among older adults with cognitive impairment in nursing homes.

Design: A cross-sectional survey.

Methods: Mokken analysis was conducted to refine the assessment scale based on unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, dimensionality, and reliability. Data were gathered from cognitively impaired older adults in a nursing home from January to February 2023. Trained nursing assistants conducted face-to-face assessments and reviewed medical records to administer the scale.

Results: Emotion and State Dimension did not meet unidimensionality criteria (H = 0.14), particularly item Q9, which also violated local independence. Monotonicity analysis showed all items exhibited monotonic increases. After refinement at c = 0.3, the scale consists of nine items. With increasing c-values, the first seven items were ultimately retained to form the final version of the scale. Both optimised scales (9-item and 7-item) satisfied reliability requirements, with all coefficients (Cronbach's α, Guttman's lambda-2, Molenaar-Sijtsma, Latent Class Reliability Coefficient) ≥ 0.74.

Conclusions: The scale is suitable for assessing fall risk among older adults with cognitive impairment, with a unidimensional scale of the first seven items recommended for practical use. Future efforts should refine the scale by exploring additional risk factors, especially emotion-related ones.

Implications for the profession and patient care: The refined 7-item scale provides nursing home staff with a practical, reliable tool for assessing fall risk in cognitively impaired older adults, enabling targeted prevention strategies to enhance safety and reduce injuries.

Impact: The refined 7-item scale provides nursing home staff with a reliable, practical, and scientifically validated tool specifically designed for assessing fall risk in older adults with cognitive impairment. Its simplicity enables efficient integration into routine clinical workflows, empowering caregivers to proactively identify risk factors and implement timely, targeted interventions. This approach directly enhances resident safety by translating assessment results into actionable prevention strategies within daily care practices.

Reporting method: This study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines.

Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信