在接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性中,研究实际扩展与标准盆腔淋巴结清扫与早期和晚期肿瘤预后之间的关系。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Wyatt MacNevin, Sandra Seo Young Kim, Ricardo A Rendon, Hamidreza Abdi, Rodney H Breau, Jonathan Izawa, Fred Saad, Alan I So, Bobby Shayegan, Ross J Mason
{"title":"在接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性中,研究实际扩展与标准盆腔淋巴结清扫与早期和晚期肿瘤预后之间的关系。","authors":"Wyatt MacNevin, Sandra Seo Young Kim, Ricardo A Rendon, Hamidreza Abdi, Rodney H Breau, Jonathan Izawa, Fred Saad, Alan I So, Bobby Shayegan, Ross J Mason","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), the impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (E-PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) on oncologic outcomes remains controversial. This study examined the association between extended vs. standard PLND (S-PLND) and biochemical recurrence (BCR), an early outcome, as well as metastatic PCa (mPCa), and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) development, late outcomes, in a multi-institutional cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High-risk post-RP patients from a Canadian PCa database were analyzed from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016. The association between PLND and BCR, mPCa, CRPC-development, and complication rate were examined using regression and correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected on patients who underwent S-PLND (n=494) and E-PLND (n=107). The median followup was 40.1 months, and time to BCR, mPC, and CRPC-development was 9.8, 46.0, and 52.1 months, respectively. The median (interquartile range) number of lymph nodes extirpated was 7 (7) and 14 (11) for the S-PLND and E-PLND groups, respectively. E-PLND was associated with increased intraoperative blood loss and higher postoperative complication rate. There were no differences in BCR-free survival based on PLND approach, with 67.1% of S-PLND cases and 71.1% of E-PLND cases reaching BCR-free survival at the end of the followup period (hazard ratio [HR] 0.784 [0.506, 1.215], p=0.28). PLND extent was not a predictor for mPCa progression (p=0.963). Similarly, there were no differences in CRPC-free survival based on dissection type (S-PLND 90.9% vs. E-PLND 89.1%, p=0.561). LN positivity was predictive of BCR, mPCa, and CRPC progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-PLND did not show significant differences in the rates of BCR, mPCa, or CRPC progression when compared to S-PLND. E-PLND was associated with higher complication rates. This study adds to the data exploring the association between PLND and PCa oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the association between real-world extended vs. standard pelvic lymph node dissection and early and late oncologic outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Wyatt MacNevin, Sandra Seo Young Kim, Ricardo A Rendon, Hamidreza Abdi, Rodney H Breau, Jonathan Izawa, Fred Saad, Alan I So, Bobby Shayegan, Ross J Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.9213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), the impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (E-PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) on oncologic outcomes remains controversial. This study examined the association between extended vs. standard PLND (S-PLND) and biochemical recurrence (BCR), an early outcome, as well as metastatic PCa (mPCa), and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) development, late outcomes, in a multi-institutional cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High-risk post-RP patients from a Canadian PCa database were analyzed from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016. The association between PLND and BCR, mPCa, CRPC-development, and complication rate were examined using regression and correlation analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected on patients who underwent S-PLND (n=494) and E-PLND (n=107). The median followup was 40.1 months, and time to BCR, mPC, and CRPC-development was 9.8, 46.0, and 52.1 months, respectively. The median (interquartile range) number of lymph nodes extirpated was 7 (7) and 14 (11) for the S-PLND and E-PLND groups, respectively. E-PLND was associated with increased intraoperative blood loss and higher postoperative complication rate. There were no differences in BCR-free survival based on PLND approach, with 67.1% of S-PLND cases and 71.1% of E-PLND cases reaching BCR-free survival at the end of the followup period (hazard ratio [HR] 0.784 [0.506, 1.215], p=0.28). PLND extent was not a predictor for mPCa progression (p=0.963). Similarly, there were no differences in CRPC-free survival based on dissection type (S-PLND 90.9% vs. E-PLND 89.1%, p=0.561). LN positivity was predictive of BCR, mPCa, and CRPC progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-PLND did not show significant differences in the rates of BCR, mPCa, or CRPC progression when compared to S-PLND. E-PLND was associated with higher complication rates. This study adds to the data exploring the association between PLND and PCa oncologic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9213\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在前列腺癌(PCa)患者中,根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫(E-PLND)对肿瘤预后的影响仍然存在争议。本研究在一个多机构队列中研究了延长与标准PLND (S-PLND)与早期结果生化复发(BCR)、转移性PCa (mPCa)和晚期结果去势抵抗性PCa (CRPC)发展之间的关系。方法:对加拿大PCa数据库中2005年1月1日至2016年12月31日的高危rp后患者进行分析。采用回归分析和相关分析探讨PLND与BCR、mPCa、crpc发展及并发症发生率的关系。结果:收集了接受S-PLND (n=494)和E-PLND (n=107)患者的数据。中位随访时间为40.1个月,BCR、mPC和crpc发展时间分别为9.8个月、46.0个月和52.1个月。S-PLND组和E-PLND组切除淋巴结的中位数(四分位数间距)分别为7(7)和14(11)个。E-PLND与术中出血量增加和术后并发症发生率升高有关。基于PLND方法的无bcr生存无差异,67.1%的S-PLND病例和71.1%的E-PLND病例在随访结束时达到无bcr生存(风险比[HR] 0.784 [0.506, 1.215], p=0.28)。PLND程度不是mPCa进展的预测因子(p=0.963)。同样,基于解剖类型的无crpc生存率也没有差异(S-PLND 90.9% vs. E-PLND 89.1%, p=0.561)。LN阳性可预测BCR、mPCa和CRPC进展。结论:与S-PLND相比,E-PLND在BCR、mPCa或CRPC进展率方面没有显着差异。E-PLND与较高的并发症发生率相关。这项研究增加了探索PLND和前列腺癌肿瘤预后之间关系的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the association between real-world extended vs. standard pelvic lymph node dissection and early and late oncologic outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Introduction: In patients with prostate cancer (PCa), the impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (E-PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) on oncologic outcomes remains controversial. This study examined the association between extended vs. standard PLND (S-PLND) and biochemical recurrence (BCR), an early outcome, as well as metastatic PCa (mPCa), and castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) development, late outcomes, in a multi-institutional cohort.

Methods: High-risk post-RP patients from a Canadian PCa database were analyzed from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2016. The association between PLND and BCR, mPCa, CRPC-development, and complication rate were examined using regression and correlation analysis.

Results: Data were collected on patients who underwent S-PLND (n=494) and E-PLND (n=107). The median followup was 40.1 months, and time to BCR, mPC, and CRPC-development was 9.8, 46.0, and 52.1 months, respectively. The median (interquartile range) number of lymph nodes extirpated was 7 (7) and 14 (11) for the S-PLND and E-PLND groups, respectively. E-PLND was associated with increased intraoperative blood loss and higher postoperative complication rate. There were no differences in BCR-free survival based on PLND approach, with 67.1% of S-PLND cases and 71.1% of E-PLND cases reaching BCR-free survival at the end of the followup period (hazard ratio [HR] 0.784 [0.506, 1.215], p=0.28). PLND extent was not a predictor for mPCa progression (p=0.963). Similarly, there were no differences in CRPC-free survival based on dissection type (S-PLND 90.9% vs. E-PLND 89.1%, p=0.561). LN positivity was predictive of BCR, mPCa, and CRPC progression.

Conclusions: E-PLND did not show significant differences in the rates of BCR, mPCa, or CRPC progression when compared to S-PLND. E-PLND was associated with higher complication rates. This study adds to the data exploring the association between PLND and PCa oncologic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信