Rotarex®装置机械取栓与导管定向溶栓治疗无运动缺陷急性血栓性下肢缺血的随机前瞻性比较研究

IF 1.5 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Sherif O Elkerdawi, Mostafa S Abdelbary, Mohamed A Rizk, Hossameldin Ibrahim, Karim El-Awady
{"title":"Rotarex®装置机械取栓与导管定向溶栓治疗无运动缺陷急性血栓性下肢缺血的随机前瞻性比较研究","authors":"Sherif O Elkerdawi, Mostafa S Abdelbary, Mohamed A Rizk, Hossameldin Ibrahim, Karim El-Awady","doi":"10.1177/15266028251363509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a serious condition leading to amputation and mortality.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective randomized study included 50 patients with thrombotic ALI treated at 2 hospitals between September 1, 2021, and August 31, 2023. Patients were randomly assigned using a double-blind method into Group A (<i>n</i> = 25), treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), and Group B (<i>n</i> = 25), receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 67.16 ± 9.56 years in Group A and 56.88 ± 11.38 years in Group B (<i>P</i> = .001), though gender distribution was comparable. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the most prevalent risk factor (88% in Group A, 72% in Group B), followed by hypertension (68%) in Group A and smoking (56%) in Group B, with no significant differences between groups. Superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery occlusions were the most common findings (68% and 56% in Group A, 72% and 68% in Group B). Retrograde contralateral femoral access was used in 60% of Group A and 56% of Group B. The technical success rate showed a tendency to be higher but did not reach statistical significance in Group A (96%) than in Group B (80%). Perioperative complications occurred in 8% of patients in both groups, with Group A experiencing 1 vessel perforation and 1 distal embolization, while Group B had 1 intracranial hemorrhage and 1 pseudoaneurysm. The 30-day mortality rate was 0% in Group A and 8% in Group B (not statistically significant). Primary patency rates at 1 month were 84.0% in Group A and 81% in Group B, decreasing to 62.5% and 55.6% at 1 year, respectively. Group A had 1 below-knee amputation and no above-knee amputations, whereas Group B had 2 below-knee and 3 above-knee amputations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PMT appeared to have a tendency toward higher technical success and lower amputation rates, with a safety profile similar to CDT, though these differences were not statistically significant. Its single-session approach and potential for reduced bleeding risk might offer some advantages, while CDT generally requires prolonged infusion.Clinical ImpactThis randomized study suggests that percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) using the Rotarex®️ device may offer advantages over catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in selected patients with acute thrombotic lower limb ischemia without motor deficit. PMT achieved rapid revascularization in a single session with a tendency toward higher technical success and fewer amputations, while maintaining a safety profile comparable to CDT. By potentially reducing treatment time, bleeding risk, and the need for intensive monitoring, PMT could represent a valuable addition to current endovascular practice. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and guide future clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251363509"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Prospective Comparative Study of Mechanical Thrombectomy by Rotarex® Device Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Acute Thrombotic Lower Limb Ischemia Without Motor Deficit.\",\"authors\":\"Sherif O Elkerdawi, Mostafa S Abdelbary, Mohamed A Rizk, Hossameldin Ibrahim, Karim El-Awady\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028251363509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a serious condition leading to amputation and mortality.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective randomized study included 50 patients with thrombotic ALI treated at 2 hospitals between September 1, 2021, and August 31, 2023. Patients were randomly assigned using a double-blind method into Group A (<i>n</i> = 25), treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), and Group B (<i>n</i> = 25), receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 67.16 ± 9.56 years in Group A and 56.88 ± 11.38 years in Group B (<i>P</i> = .001), though gender distribution was comparable. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the most prevalent risk factor (88% in Group A, 72% in Group B), followed by hypertension (68%) in Group A and smoking (56%) in Group B, with no significant differences between groups. Superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery occlusions were the most common findings (68% and 56% in Group A, 72% and 68% in Group B). Retrograde contralateral femoral access was used in 60% of Group A and 56% of Group B. The technical success rate showed a tendency to be higher but did not reach statistical significance in Group A (96%) than in Group B (80%). Perioperative complications occurred in 8% of patients in both groups, with Group A experiencing 1 vessel perforation and 1 distal embolization, while Group B had 1 intracranial hemorrhage and 1 pseudoaneurysm. The 30-day mortality rate was 0% in Group A and 8% in Group B (not statistically significant). Primary patency rates at 1 month were 84.0% in Group A and 81% in Group B, decreasing to 62.5% and 55.6% at 1 year, respectively. Group A had 1 below-knee amputation and no above-knee amputations, whereas Group B had 2 below-knee and 3 above-knee amputations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PMT appeared to have a tendency toward higher technical success and lower amputation rates, with a safety profile similar to CDT, though these differences were not statistically significant. Its single-session approach and potential for reduced bleeding risk might offer some advantages, while CDT generally requires prolonged infusion.Clinical ImpactThis randomized study suggests that percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) using the Rotarex®️ device may offer advantages over catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in selected patients with acute thrombotic lower limb ischemia without motor deficit. PMT achieved rapid revascularization in a single session with a tendency toward higher technical success and fewer amputations, while maintaining a safety profile comparable to CDT. By potentially reducing treatment time, bleeding risk, and the need for intensive monitoring, PMT could represent a valuable addition to current endovascular practice. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and guide future clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15266028251363509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251363509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251363509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性肢体缺血(ALI)是导致截肢和死亡的严重疾病。患者和方法:这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了2021年9月1日至2023年8月31日期间在2家医院治疗的50例血栓性ALI患者。采用双盲方法将患者随机分为a组(n = 25)和B组(n = 25), a组接受经皮机械取栓(PMT), B组接受导管定向溶栓(CDT)。结果:A组患者平均年龄67.16±9.56岁,B组患者平均年龄56.88±11.38岁(P = 0.05)。001),尽管性别分布具有可比性。糖尿病(DM)是最常见的危险因素(A组88%,B组72%),其次是高血压(A组68%)和吸烟(B组56%),两组间差异无统计学意义。股浅动脉和腘动脉闭塞是最常见的表现(A组68%和56%,B组72%和68%)。A组60%、B组56%采用逆行股侧入路,A组技术成功率(96%)有高于B组(80%)的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。两组患者围手术期并发症发生率均为8%,其中A组1例血管穿孔,远端栓塞1例,B组1例颅内出血,假性动脉瘤1例。A组30天死亡率为0%,B组为8%(无统计学意义)。A组1个月初通畅率为84.0%,B组为81%,1年后分别降至62.5%和55.6%。A组膝下截肢1例,无膝上截肢;B组膝下截肢2例,膝上截肢3例。结论:PMT似乎有更高的技术成功率和更低的截肢率的趋势,其安全性与CDT相似,尽管这些差异没有统计学意义。它的单疗程方法和降低出血风险的潜力可能提供一些优势,而CDT通常需要长时间输注。临床影响这项随机研究表明,在没有运动缺陷的急性血栓性下肢缺血患者中,使用Rotarex®️装置的经皮机械取栓(PMT)可能比导管定向溶栓(CDT)更有优势。PMT在一次手术中实现了快速血运重建,具有更高的技术成功率和更少的截肢的趋势,同时保持了与CDT相当的安全性。通过潜在地减少治疗时间、出血风险和强化监测的需要,PMT可能是当前血管内治疗的一个有价值的补充。有必要进行更大规模的多中心随访研究,以证实这些发现并指导未来的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized Prospective Comparative Study of Mechanical Thrombectomy by Rotarex® Device Versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Management of Acute Thrombotic Lower Limb Ischemia Without Motor Deficit.

Background: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a serious condition leading to amputation and mortality.

Patients and methods: This prospective randomized study included 50 patients with thrombotic ALI treated at 2 hospitals between September 1, 2021, and August 31, 2023. Patients were randomly assigned using a double-blind method into Group A (n = 25), treated with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), and Group B (n = 25), receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT).

Results: The mean age was 67.16 ± 9.56 years in Group A and 56.88 ± 11.38 years in Group B (P = .001), though gender distribution was comparable. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the most prevalent risk factor (88% in Group A, 72% in Group B), followed by hypertension (68%) in Group A and smoking (56%) in Group B, with no significant differences between groups. Superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery occlusions were the most common findings (68% and 56% in Group A, 72% and 68% in Group B). Retrograde contralateral femoral access was used in 60% of Group A and 56% of Group B. The technical success rate showed a tendency to be higher but did not reach statistical significance in Group A (96%) than in Group B (80%). Perioperative complications occurred in 8% of patients in both groups, with Group A experiencing 1 vessel perforation and 1 distal embolization, while Group B had 1 intracranial hemorrhage and 1 pseudoaneurysm. The 30-day mortality rate was 0% in Group A and 8% in Group B (not statistically significant). Primary patency rates at 1 month were 84.0% in Group A and 81% in Group B, decreasing to 62.5% and 55.6% at 1 year, respectively. Group A had 1 below-knee amputation and no above-knee amputations, whereas Group B had 2 below-knee and 3 above-knee amputations.

Conclusion: PMT appeared to have a tendency toward higher technical success and lower amputation rates, with a safety profile similar to CDT, though these differences were not statistically significant. Its single-session approach and potential for reduced bleeding risk might offer some advantages, while CDT generally requires prolonged infusion.Clinical ImpactThis randomized study suggests that percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) using the Rotarex®️ device may offer advantages over catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in selected patients with acute thrombotic lower limb ischemia without motor deficit. PMT achieved rapid revascularization in a single session with a tendency toward higher technical success and fewer amputations, while maintaining a safety profile comparable to CDT. By potentially reducing treatment time, bleeding risk, and the need for intensive monitoring, PMT could represent a valuable addition to current endovascular practice. Larger multicenter studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and guide future clinical adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信