加拿大肿瘤患者生育能力保存的多学科评估:不列颠哥伦比亚省的观点。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Regina-Veronicka Kalaydina, Kiera Liblik, Amy Dhillon, Kristin Marr, Karen Goddard, Alannah Smrke, A Fuchsia Howard, Stuart Peacock, Julie Wong, Luke Witherspoon, Ryan Flannigan
{"title":"加拿大肿瘤患者生育能力保存的多学科评估:不列颠哥伦比亚省的观点。","authors":"Regina-Veronicka Kalaydina, Kiera Liblik, Amy Dhillon, Kristin Marr, Karen Goddard, Alannah Smrke, A Fuchsia Howard, Stuart Peacock, Julie Wong, Luke Witherspoon, Ryan Flannigan","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infertility represents a devastating side effect of antineoplastic agents, particularly in adolescents and young adults (AYA). A paucity of practitioner-initiated fertility preservation (FP) counseling has resulted in low uptake of assisted reproductive technologies. There is no dedicated FP program in British Columbia (BC) and few across Canada, leaving patients without adequate support. This study aimed to identify, analyze, and prioritize the FP needs of BC oncology patients, predominantly AYAs, according to healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey developed by a multidisciplinary team was distributed to practitioners across the British Columbia Cancer Network from March to September 2023. Survey data were analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, our survey response rate was 74.2%. Of 120 responses recorded in total, 89 - from 27 oncologists, 58 nurses/nurse practitioners, two family physicians, one fertility specialist, and one care aide - were included in the analysis While 43.6% of respondents indicated that their patients were likely to be impacted by treatment-related infertility, only 26.8% reported that their patients are usually referred to FP services, and 45.7% reported that their patients receive fertility counseling. Barriers to FP counseling included competing priorities, appointment length, lack of clinical knowledge, urgency to start treatment, perceived futility of FP, and perceived lack of financial resources. Facilitators of FP discussions were awareness, education, financial assistance, provider-initiated discussions, knowledgeable providers, and locally dedicated FP programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents the first characterization of interdisciplinary provider practices and beliefs surrounding FP among oncology patients in BC, highlighting the need for an FP program to improve patient care and quality of life. This data can be leveraged nationwide to inform the development and evolution of FP programs for this critically underserved patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multidisciplinary evaluation of fertility preservation for oncology patients in Canada: The British Columbia perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Regina-Veronicka Kalaydina, Kiera Liblik, Amy Dhillon, Kristin Marr, Karen Goddard, Alannah Smrke, A Fuchsia Howard, Stuart Peacock, Julie Wong, Luke Witherspoon, Ryan Flannigan\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.9215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infertility represents a devastating side effect of antineoplastic agents, particularly in adolescents and young adults (AYA). A paucity of practitioner-initiated fertility preservation (FP) counseling has resulted in low uptake of assisted reproductive technologies. There is no dedicated FP program in British Columbia (BC) and few across Canada, leaving patients without adequate support. This study aimed to identify, analyze, and prioritize the FP needs of BC oncology patients, predominantly AYAs, according to healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey developed by a multidisciplinary team was distributed to practitioners across the British Columbia Cancer Network from March to September 2023. Survey data were analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, our survey response rate was 74.2%. Of 120 responses recorded in total, 89 - from 27 oncologists, 58 nurses/nurse practitioners, two family physicians, one fertility specialist, and one care aide - were included in the analysis While 43.6% of respondents indicated that their patients were likely to be impacted by treatment-related infertility, only 26.8% reported that their patients are usually referred to FP services, and 45.7% reported that their patients receive fertility counseling. Barriers to FP counseling included competing priorities, appointment length, lack of clinical knowledge, urgency to start treatment, perceived futility of FP, and perceived lack of financial resources. Facilitators of FP discussions were awareness, education, financial assistance, provider-initiated discussions, knowledgeable providers, and locally dedicated FP programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents the first characterization of interdisciplinary provider practices and beliefs surrounding FP among oncology patients in BC, highlighting the need for an FP program to improve patient care and quality of life. This data can be leveraged nationwide to inform the development and evolution of FP programs for this critically underserved patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9215\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不育是抗肿瘤药物的一个破坏性副作用,特别是在青少年和年轻人(AYA)中。医生发起的生育保留(FP)咨询的缺乏导致辅助生殖技术的低吸收。在不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)没有专门的计划生育项目,在加拿大各地也很少,这使得患者得不到足够的支持。根据医疗保健提供者的说法,本研究旨在确定、分析和优先考虑BC肿瘤患者(主要是aya)的FP需求。方法:由一个多学科团队开发的在线调查于2023年3月至9月分发给不列颠哥伦比亚省癌症网络的从业人员。对调查数据进行描述性分析。结果:总体而言,我们的调查回复率为74.2%。在总共记录的120份回复中,有89份——来自27名肿瘤学家、58名护士/执业护士、2名家庭医生、1名生育专家和1名护理助理——被纳入分析。43.6%的受访者表示,他们的患者可能受到与治疗相关的不孕症的影响,只有26.8%的受访者表示,他们的患者通常被转介到计划生育服务,45.7%的受访者表示,他们的患者接受了生育咨询。计划生育咨询的障碍包括优先事项竞争、预约时间长短、缺乏临床知识、开始治疗的紧迫性、计划生育的无用性以及缺乏财政资源。促进计划生育讨论的因素包括意识、教育、财政援助、提供者发起的讨论、知识渊博的提供者和当地专门的计划生育项目。结论:本研究首次表征了BC省肿瘤患者中围绕计划生育的跨学科提供者实践和信念,强调了计划生育项目改善患者护理和生活质量的必要性。这些数据可以在全国范围内利用,为这一服务严重不足的患者群体的计划生育项目的发展和演变提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multidisciplinary evaluation of fertility preservation for oncology patients in Canada: The British Columbia perspective.

Introduction: Infertility represents a devastating side effect of antineoplastic agents, particularly in adolescents and young adults (AYA). A paucity of practitioner-initiated fertility preservation (FP) counseling has resulted in low uptake of assisted reproductive technologies. There is no dedicated FP program in British Columbia (BC) and few across Canada, leaving patients without adequate support. This study aimed to identify, analyze, and prioritize the FP needs of BC oncology patients, predominantly AYAs, according to healthcare providers.

Methods: An online survey developed by a multidisciplinary team was distributed to practitioners across the British Columbia Cancer Network from March to September 2023. Survey data were analyzed descriptively.

Results: Overall, our survey response rate was 74.2%. Of 120 responses recorded in total, 89 - from 27 oncologists, 58 nurses/nurse practitioners, two family physicians, one fertility specialist, and one care aide - were included in the analysis While 43.6% of respondents indicated that their patients were likely to be impacted by treatment-related infertility, only 26.8% reported that their patients are usually referred to FP services, and 45.7% reported that their patients receive fertility counseling. Barriers to FP counseling included competing priorities, appointment length, lack of clinical knowledge, urgency to start treatment, perceived futility of FP, and perceived lack of financial resources. Facilitators of FP discussions were awareness, education, financial assistance, provider-initiated discussions, knowledgeable providers, and locally dedicated FP programs.

Conclusions: This study represents the first characterization of interdisciplinary provider practices and beliefs surrounding FP among oncology patients in BC, highlighting the need for an FP program to improve patient care and quality of life. This data can be leveraged nationwide to inform the development and evolution of FP programs for this critically underserved patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信