Julie S Armin, Jeffrey L Goodie, Melanie Steiner, Dean A Seehusen, Nathaniel E Miller
{"title":"团队科学如何在已发表的家庭医学研究中被记录和描述。","authors":"Julie S Armin, Jeffrey L Goodie, Melanie Steiner, Dean A Seehusen, Nathaniel E Miller","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240362R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Increasingly emphasized by leaders in family medicine and primary care research, team science is an approach to research that requires clear documentation for replicability. Here, we report the approach to documenting team science in 2 US family medicine research journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our interdisciplinary team, composed of MDs and PhDs from family medicine and other disciplines, established a definition of the \"team science\" construct, which included the utilization of interdisciplinary partnerships and/or collaboration with community-based organizations. Two team members reviewed every original research article published in 2023 in the <i>Annals of Family Medicine</i> (AFM) and the <i>Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine</i> (JABFM). Data extraction identified the use of the term \"team science\" or the presence of elements of the construct as defined by the team, as well as the funding source(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 107 articles reviewed, none explicitly mentioned the term \"team science.\" However, 19 (17.8%) described interdisciplinary partnerships. Seventeen (15.9%) described the disciplines of the contributors, and 5 (4.7%) described community collaborators. Most articles (80.4%) were funded studies, with 70.9% supported by national governmental or nongovernmental entities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample of articles, team science was either not reported at all or it was described in a limited way. The authors recommend that editors encourage discussions of interdisciplinarity and team science research practices in manuscripts, including descriptions of the strengths each disciplinary representative brings to the team.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"619-624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Team Science Is Documented and Described in Published Family Medicine Research.\",\"authors\":\"Julie S Armin, Jeffrey L Goodie, Melanie Steiner, Dean A Seehusen, Nathaniel E Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240362R2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Increasingly emphasized by leaders in family medicine and primary care research, team science is an approach to research that requires clear documentation for replicability. Here, we report the approach to documenting team science in 2 US family medicine research journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our interdisciplinary team, composed of MDs and PhDs from family medicine and other disciplines, established a definition of the \\\"team science\\\" construct, which included the utilization of interdisciplinary partnerships and/or collaboration with community-based organizations. Two team members reviewed every original research article published in 2023 in the <i>Annals of Family Medicine</i> (AFM) and the <i>Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine</i> (JABFM). Data extraction identified the use of the term \\\"team science\\\" or the presence of elements of the construct as defined by the team, as well as the funding source(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 107 articles reviewed, none explicitly mentioned the term \\\"team science.\\\" However, 19 (17.8%) described interdisciplinary partnerships. Seventeen (15.9%) described the disciplines of the contributors, and 5 (4.7%) described community collaborators. Most articles (80.4%) were funded studies, with 70.9% supported by national governmental or nongovernmental entities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample of articles, team science was either not reported at all or it was described in a limited way. The authors recommend that editors encourage discussions of interdisciplinarity and team science research practices in manuscripts, including descriptions of the strengths each disciplinary representative brings to the team.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"619-624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240362R2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240362R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Team Science Is Documented and Described in Published Family Medicine Research.
Purpose: Increasingly emphasized by leaders in family medicine and primary care research, team science is an approach to research that requires clear documentation for replicability. Here, we report the approach to documenting team science in 2 US family medicine research journals.
Methods: Our interdisciplinary team, composed of MDs and PhDs from family medicine and other disciplines, established a definition of the "team science" construct, which included the utilization of interdisciplinary partnerships and/or collaboration with community-based organizations. Two team members reviewed every original research article published in 2023 in the Annals of Family Medicine (AFM) and the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (JABFM). Data extraction identified the use of the term "team science" or the presence of elements of the construct as defined by the team, as well as the funding source(s).
Results: Of the 107 articles reviewed, none explicitly mentioned the term "team science." However, 19 (17.8%) described interdisciplinary partnerships. Seventeen (15.9%) described the disciplines of the contributors, and 5 (4.7%) described community collaborators. Most articles (80.4%) were funded studies, with 70.9% supported by national governmental or nongovernmental entities.
Conclusions: In this sample of articles, team science was either not reported at all or it was described in a limited way. The authors recommend that editors encourage discussions of interdisciplinarity and team science research practices in manuscripts, including descriptions of the strengths each disciplinary representative brings to the team.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.