{"title":"经桡动脉心导管置入术后Teleflex血管带止血器与Terumo Radial (TR)带压缩器的比较:回顾性研究。","authors":"Andrea Lacourciere, Ray Brittany Gannon","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transradial access has emerged as the preferred approach for cardiac catheterization. A comprehensive evaluation of the available hemostatic compression devices is necessary, as their use may impact clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the time to hemostasis and the rate of early local vascular complications in patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age treated with either a Vasc Band hemostat or a Terumo Radial (TR) Band compression device after transradial cardiac catheterization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 250 patients who underwent transradial cardiac catheterization from September 2022 to December 2022 at a 280-bed community hospital. Data were manually extracted from the electronic medical record system. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference in time to hemostasis between groups. The χ<sup>2</sup> analyses was used to determine differences in rates of early local vascular complications between the groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were no statistical differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between the two groups. For patients who underwent a diagnostic left heart catheterization only, there was a significant difference in time (minutes) to hemostasis between the two devices: (Md = 57, n = 164), U = 3517, z = 2.940, P = .003. Time (minutes) to hemostasis was reduced with Vasc Band (Md = 54.5, n = 118) than TR Band (Md = 68.5, n = 46). No significant differences in time to hemostasis were found between the two devices among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: (Md = 154.5, n = 56), U = 343, z = 0.205, P = .838. There were no significant differences in bleeding, hematoma formation, or ecchymosis between the band types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to compare outcomes of cardiac catheterization patients treated with the Vasc Band compared with the TR Band. Future prospective studies should assess the clinical outcomes of the Vasc Band in comparison with other radial artery compression devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Teleflex Vasc Band Hemostat and the Terumo Radial (TR) Band Compression Device After Transradial Cardiac Catheterization: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lacourciere, Ray Brittany Gannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transradial access has emerged as the preferred approach for cardiac catheterization. A comprehensive evaluation of the available hemostatic compression devices is necessary, as their use may impact clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the time to hemostasis and the rate of early local vascular complications in patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age treated with either a Vasc Band hemostat or a Terumo Radial (TR) Band compression device after transradial cardiac catheterization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 250 patients who underwent transradial cardiac catheterization from September 2022 to December 2022 at a 280-bed community hospital. Data were manually extracted from the electronic medical record system. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference in time to hemostasis between groups. The χ<sup>2</sup> analyses was used to determine differences in rates of early local vascular complications between the groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were no statistical differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between the two groups. For patients who underwent a diagnostic left heart catheterization only, there was a significant difference in time (minutes) to hemostasis between the two devices: (Md = 57, n = 164), U = 3517, z = 2.940, P = .003. Time (minutes) to hemostasis was reduced with Vasc Band (Md = 54.5, n = 118) than TR Band (Md = 68.5, n = 46). No significant differences in time to hemostasis were found between the two devices among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: (Md = 154.5, n = 56), U = 343, z = 0.205, P = .838. There were no significant differences in bleeding, hematoma formation, or ecchymosis between the band types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to compare outcomes of cardiac catheterization patients treated with the Vasc Band compared with the TR Band. Future prospective studies should assess the clinical outcomes of the Vasc Band in comparison with other radial artery compression devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.02.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:经桡动脉通路已成为心导管置入术的首选途径。对可用的止血压缩装置进行全面评估是必要的,因为它们的使用可能会影响临床结果。本研究旨在比较18岁以上经桡动脉心导管置管后使用Vasc Band止血器或Terumo Radial (TR) Band压迫装置的患者的止血时间和早期局部血管并发症的发生率。设计:单中心、回顾性队列研究。方法:样本包括250例于2022年9月至2022年12月在一家拥有280个床位的社区医院接受经桡动脉心导管插入术的患者。数据由人工从电子病历系统中提取。采用Mann-Whitney U检验评估两组患者止血时间的差异。采用χ2分析确定两组间早期局部血管并发症发生率的差异。结果:两组患者的基线和手术特征无统计学差异。对于仅行诊断性左心导管的患者,两种装置的止血时间(min)有显著差异:(Md = 57, n = 164), U = 3517, z = 2.940, P = 0.003。Vasc带(Md = 54.5, n = 118)比TR带(Md = 68.5, n = 46)缩短止血时间(min)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者两种装置的止血时间无显著差异:(Md = 154.5, n = 56), U = 343, z = 0.205, P = 0.838。两种类型在出血、血肿形成或瘀斑方面无显著差异。结论:本研究首次比较了Vasc束与TR束治疗心导管患者的预后。未来的前瞻性研究应该评估Vasc带与其他桡动脉压迫装置的临床效果。
Comparison of the Teleflex Vasc Band Hemostat and the Terumo Radial (TR) Band Compression Device After Transradial Cardiac Catheterization: A Retrospective Study.
Purpose: Transradial access has emerged as the preferred approach for cardiac catheterization. A comprehensive evaluation of the available hemostatic compression devices is necessary, as their use may impact clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the time to hemostasis and the rate of early local vascular complications in patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age treated with either a Vasc Band hemostat or a Terumo Radial (TR) Band compression device after transradial cardiac catheterization.
Methods: The sample included 250 patients who underwent transradial cardiac catheterization from September 2022 to December 2022 at a 280-bed community hospital. Data were manually extracted from the electronic medical record system. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference in time to hemostasis between groups. The χ2 analyses was used to determine differences in rates of early local vascular complications between the groups.
Findings: There were no statistical differences in baseline and procedural characteristics between the two groups. For patients who underwent a diagnostic left heart catheterization only, there was a significant difference in time (minutes) to hemostasis between the two devices: (Md = 57, n = 164), U = 3517, z = 2.940, P = .003. Time (minutes) to hemostasis was reduced with Vasc Band (Md = 54.5, n = 118) than TR Band (Md = 68.5, n = 46). No significant differences in time to hemostasis were found between the two devices among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: (Md = 154.5, n = 56), U = 343, z = 0.205, P = .838. There were no significant differences in bleeding, hematoma formation, or ecchymosis between the band types.
Conclusions: This study is the first to compare outcomes of cardiac catheterization patients treated with the Vasc Band compared with the TR Band. Future prospective studies should assess the clinical outcomes of the Vasc Band in comparison with other radial artery compression devices.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.