{"title":"基于基因的适合度模型及其对遗传变异的影响:遗传和近交负荷。","authors":"Parul Johri, Brian Charlesworth","doi":"10.1093/genetics/iyaf169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the companion paper to this, we examined the consequences for patterns of linkage disequilibrium of the \"gene\" model of fitness, which postulates that the effects of recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations located at different sites within a gene fail to complement each other. Here, we examine the consequences of the gene model for the genetic and inbreeding loads, using both analytical and simulation methods, and contrast it with the frequently used \"sites\" model that allows allelic complementation. We show that the gene model results in a slightly lower genetic load, but a much smaller inbreeding load, than the sites model, implying that standard predictions of mutational contributions to inbreeding depression may be overestimates. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled, and shown to considerably reduce the inbreeding load for both the gene and sites models. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to data on inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster. The widespread assumption that inbreeding depression is largely due to deleterious mutations should be re-examined in the light of our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48925,"journal":{"name":"Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A gene-based model of fitness and its implications for genetic variation: Genetic and inbreeding loads.\",\"authors\":\"Parul Johri, Brian Charlesworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/genetics/iyaf169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the companion paper to this, we examined the consequences for patterns of linkage disequilibrium of the \\\"gene\\\" model of fitness, which postulates that the effects of recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations located at different sites within a gene fail to complement each other. Here, we examine the consequences of the gene model for the genetic and inbreeding loads, using both analytical and simulation methods, and contrast it with the frequently used \\\"sites\\\" model that allows allelic complementation. We show that the gene model results in a slightly lower genetic load, but a much smaller inbreeding load, than the sites model, implying that standard predictions of mutational contributions to inbreeding depression may be overestimates. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled, and shown to considerably reduce the inbreeding load for both the gene and sites models. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to data on inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster. The widespread assumption that inbreeding depression is largely due to deleterious mutations should be re-examined in the light of our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyaf169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A gene-based model of fitness and its implications for genetic variation: Genetic and inbreeding loads.
In the companion paper to this, we examined the consequences for patterns of linkage disequilibrium of the "gene" model of fitness, which postulates that the effects of recessive or partially recessive deleterious mutations located at different sites within a gene fail to complement each other. Here, we examine the consequences of the gene model for the genetic and inbreeding loads, using both analytical and simulation methods, and contrast it with the frequently used "sites" model that allows allelic complementation. We show that the gene model results in a slightly lower genetic load, but a much smaller inbreeding load, than the sites model, implying that standard predictions of mutational contributions to inbreeding depression may be overestimates. Synergistic epistasis between pairs of mutations was also modeled, and shown to considerably reduce the inbreeding load for both the gene and sites models. The theoretical results are discussed in relation to data on inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster. The widespread assumption that inbreeding depression is largely due to deleterious mutations should be re-examined in the light of our findings.
期刊介绍:
GENETICS is published by the Genetics Society of America, a scholarly society that seeks to deepen our understanding of the living world by advancing our understanding of genetics. Since 1916, GENETICS has published high-quality, original research presenting novel findings bearing on genetics and genomics. The journal publishes empirical studies of organisms ranging from microbes to humans, as well as theoretical work.
While it has an illustrious history, GENETICS has changed along with the communities it serves: it is not your mentor''s journal.
The editors make decisions quickly – in around 30 days – without sacrificing the excellence and scholarship for which the journal has long been known. GENETICS is a peer reviewed, peer-edited journal, with an international reach and increasing visibility and impact. All editorial decisions are made through collaboration of at least two editors who are practicing scientists.
GENETICS is constantly innovating: expanded types of content include Reviews, Commentary (current issues of interest to geneticists), Perspectives (historical), Primers (to introduce primary literature into the classroom), Toolbox Reviews, plus YeastBook, FlyBook, and WormBook (coming spring 2016). For particularly time-sensitive results, we publish Communications. As part of our mission to serve our communities, we''ve published thematic collections, including Genomic Selection, Multiparental Populations, Mouse Collaborative Cross, and the Genetics of Sex.