髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折:哪种假体设计和固定方法再手术风险最低?

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Sjur Børsheim, Torbjørn Berge Kristensen, Geir Hallan, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ove Furnes, Eva Dybvik, Stein Atle Lie, Håvard Dale
{"title":"髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折:哪种假体设计和固定方法再手术风险最低?","authors":"Sjur Børsheim, Torbjørn Berge Kristensen, Geir Hallan, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ove Furnes, Eva Dybvik, Stein Atle Lie, Håvard Dale","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1706.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) is a major complication following hip arthroplasty. This study examined the influence of femoral component design and fixation method on the risk of reoperation for PPFF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data on femoral component type use for primary hip arthroplasty stems reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2023. The study included 187,576 well-documented femoral components used in hemi- and total hip arthroplasties which were assessed by Cox regression. The femoral components were categorized into five groups: 1) cemented composite beam (n = 30,415), and two types of cemented polished taper-slip components; 2) double-tapered (n = 52,255); 3) triple-tapered (n = 13,894), and two types of uncemented femoral components; 4) wedged collarless (n = 38,389); and 5) wedged collared (n = 40,853). Endpoint was reoperation for PPFF (revisions and osteosyntheses).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,398 femoral components (0.7%) were reported with a reoperation due to PPFF. The risk of reoperation was significantly higher for cemented double-tapered (adjusted hazard rate ratio (aHRR) 4.0 (95% CI 3.1 to 5.2), cemented triple-tapered (aHRR 4.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 5.6)), uncemented wedged collarless (aHRR 7.3 (95% CI 5.6 to 9.5)), and uncemented wedged collared (aHRR 3.5 (95% CI 2.6 to 4.6)) components compared to cemented composite beam components. Cemented triple-tapered prostheses exhibited a similar risk of reoperation (aHRR 1.0 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.3)) to cemented double-tapered components. Uncemented wedged collarless prostheses were associated with a higher risk of PPFF (aHRR 2.1 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.5)) compared to uncemented wedged collared designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To minimize the risk of PPFF, cemented composite-beam femoral components should be the surgeon's preferred choice. If cementing is not an option, uncemented wedged collared components are the best alternative. Opting for a cemented triple-tapered design does not improve outcomes compared to double-tapered component.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 9","pages":"873-884"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Periprosthetic femoral fracture following hip arthroplasty : which component design and fixation method has the lowest risk of reoperation?\",\"authors\":\"Sjur Børsheim, Torbjørn Berge Kristensen, Geir Hallan, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Ove Furnes, Eva Dybvik, Stein Atle Lie, Håvard Dale\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1706.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) is a major complication following hip arthroplasty. This study examined the influence of femoral component design and fixation method on the risk of reoperation for PPFF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data on femoral component type use for primary hip arthroplasty stems reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2023. The study included 187,576 well-documented femoral components used in hemi- and total hip arthroplasties which were assessed by Cox regression. The femoral components were categorized into five groups: 1) cemented composite beam (n = 30,415), and two types of cemented polished taper-slip components; 2) double-tapered (n = 52,255); 3) triple-tapered (n = 13,894), and two types of uncemented femoral components; 4) wedged collarless (n = 38,389); and 5) wedged collared (n = 40,853). Endpoint was reoperation for PPFF (revisions and osteosyntheses).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,398 femoral components (0.7%) were reported with a reoperation due to PPFF. The risk of reoperation was significantly higher for cemented double-tapered (adjusted hazard rate ratio (aHRR) 4.0 (95% CI 3.1 to 5.2), cemented triple-tapered (aHRR 4.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 5.6)), uncemented wedged collarless (aHRR 7.3 (95% CI 5.6 to 9.5)), and uncemented wedged collared (aHRR 3.5 (95% CI 2.6 to 4.6)) components compared to cemented composite beam components. Cemented triple-tapered prostheses exhibited a similar risk of reoperation (aHRR 1.0 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.3)) to cemented double-tapered components. Uncemented wedged collarless prostheses were associated with a higher risk of PPFF (aHRR 2.1 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.5)) compared to uncemented wedged collared designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To minimize the risk of PPFF, cemented composite-beam femoral components should be the surgeon's preferred choice. If cementing is not an option, uncemented wedged collared components are the best alternative. Opting for a cemented triple-tapered design does not improve outcomes compared to double-tapered component.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 9\",\"pages\":\"873-884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1706.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1706.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:股骨假体周围骨折(PPFF)是髋关节置换术后的主要并发症。本研究探讨股骨假体设计和固定方法对PPFF再手术风险的影响。方法:我们分析了2005年1月1日至2023年12月31日挪威关节置换术登记和挪威髋部骨折登记中报告的用于原发性髋关节置换术的股骨假体类型的数据。该研究包括187,576个记录良好的用于半髋关节置换术和全髋关节置换术的股骨假体,并通过Cox回归进行评估。将股骨假体分为5组:1)胶结复合梁(n = 30,415)和2种胶结抛光锥形滑动假体;2)双锥形(n = 52,255);3)三锥形(n = 13,894)和两种非骨水泥股骨假体;4)楔形无领(n = 38389);5)楔形领(n = 40,853)。终点是再手术治疗PPFF(修复和骨合成)。结果:共有1,398例股骨假体(0.7%)因PPFF再次手术。与胶结复合梁组件相比,胶结双锥形组件(调整危险率比(aHRR) 4.0 (95% CI 3.1至5.2)、胶结三锥形组件(aHRR 4.0 (95% CI 2.9至5.6))、未胶结楔形无环组件(aHRR 7.3 (95% CI 5.6至9.5))和未胶结楔形有环组件(aHRR 3.5 (95% CI 2.6至4.6))的再手术风险明显更高。三锥形骨水泥假体的再手术风险与双锥形骨水泥假体相似(aHRR 1.0 (95% CI 0.8 ~ 1.3))。与非骨水泥楔套式假体相比,非骨水泥楔套式假体发生PPFF的风险更高(aHRR 2.1 (95% CI 1.8 ~ 2.5))。结论:为了最大限度地降低PPFF的风险,骨水泥复合梁股假体应是外科医生的首选。如果不能固井,未固井楔形接箍组件是最好的选择。与双锥形组件相比,选择胶结的三锥形设计并不能改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Periprosthetic femoral fracture following hip arthroplasty : which component design and fixation method has the lowest risk of reoperation?

Aims: Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) is a major complication following hip arthroplasty. This study examined the influence of femoral component design and fixation method on the risk of reoperation for PPFF.

Methods: We analyzed data on femoral component type use for primary hip arthroplasty stems reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2023. The study included 187,576 well-documented femoral components used in hemi- and total hip arthroplasties which were assessed by Cox regression. The femoral components were categorized into five groups: 1) cemented composite beam (n = 30,415), and two types of cemented polished taper-slip components; 2) double-tapered (n = 52,255); 3) triple-tapered (n = 13,894), and two types of uncemented femoral components; 4) wedged collarless (n = 38,389); and 5) wedged collared (n = 40,853). Endpoint was reoperation for PPFF (revisions and osteosyntheses).

Results: A total of 1,398 femoral components (0.7%) were reported with a reoperation due to PPFF. The risk of reoperation was significantly higher for cemented double-tapered (adjusted hazard rate ratio (aHRR) 4.0 (95% CI 3.1 to 5.2), cemented triple-tapered (aHRR 4.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 5.6)), uncemented wedged collarless (aHRR 7.3 (95% CI 5.6 to 9.5)), and uncemented wedged collared (aHRR 3.5 (95% CI 2.6 to 4.6)) components compared to cemented composite beam components. Cemented triple-tapered prostheses exhibited a similar risk of reoperation (aHRR 1.0 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.3)) to cemented double-tapered components. Uncemented wedged collarless prostheses were associated with a higher risk of PPFF (aHRR 2.1 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.5)) compared to uncemented wedged collared designs.

Conclusion: To minimize the risk of PPFF, cemented composite-beam femoral components should be the surgeon's preferred choice. If cementing is not an option, uncemented wedged collared components are the best alternative. Opting for a cemented triple-tapered design does not improve outcomes compared to double-tapered component.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信