反向全肩关节置换术后满意的复工率。

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Alberto Pedrazzini, Flamur Zendeli, Bettina Hochreiter, Samy Bouaicha, Karl Wieser, Philipp Kriechling
{"title":"反向全肩关节置换术后满意的复工率。","authors":"Alberto Pedrazzini, Flamur Zendeli, Bettina Hochreiter, Samy Bouaicha, Karl Wieser, Philipp Kriechling","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1587.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to analyze the ability to return to work (RTW) after implantation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with special attention to heavy labourers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All working patients younger than 60 years of age who underwent RTSA between September 2005 and October 2021 were retrospectively evaluated for their ability to RTW. Basic demographic information, job intensity, change of work, and preoperative sick leave were collected. Constant-Murley score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) preoperatively and at two years' follow-up, complications, and revision surgeries were used to evaluate the outcome. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict RTW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 167 of 209 eligible patients were employed at the time of surgery (median age 55 years (IQR 50.3 to 57.8), 34.1% (n = 57) female), of whom 75 (44.9%), 61 (36.5%), and 31 (18.6%) were classified to have light, medium, or heavy work intensity, respectively. Postoperatively, 73.7% (123/167) of them RTW at a median time of four months (IQR 2 to 7). Of those who RTW, 9.8% of patients (12/123) had to change occupation to less demanding jobs. Patients with high-intensity jobs had a lower RTW rate (19/31; 61.3%) compared with those with light (59/75; 78.7%) and medium-intensity jobs (45/61; 73.8%). Patients who RTW had better pre- and postoperative outcomes as well as greater improvement in relative CS (76% vs 34%; p < 0.001), CS for pain (14 vs 7 with 15 as best value; p < 0.001), and SSV (75% vs 20%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that absence of preoperative sick leave (OR 6.81 (95% CI 2.63 to 19.4); p < 0.001) was associated with higher RTW rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than two-thirds of preoperatively working patients were able to RTW after RTSA, depending on work intensity. Higher RTW rates were seen in patients who were not on sick leave preoperatively. This information is highly relevant for the surgeon to counsel patients accordingly and possibly limit expectations, especially in heavy workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 9","pages":"915-923"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satisfactory return to work rates after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Pedrazzini, Flamur Zendeli, Bettina Hochreiter, Samy Bouaicha, Karl Wieser, Philipp Kriechling\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1587.R2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim was to analyze the ability to return to work (RTW) after implantation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with special attention to heavy labourers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All working patients younger than 60 years of age who underwent RTSA between September 2005 and October 2021 were retrospectively evaluated for their ability to RTW. Basic demographic information, job intensity, change of work, and preoperative sick leave were collected. Constant-Murley score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) preoperatively and at two years' follow-up, complications, and revision surgeries were used to evaluate the outcome. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict RTW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 167 of 209 eligible patients were employed at the time of surgery (median age 55 years (IQR 50.3 to 57.8), 34.1% (n = 57) female), of whom 75 (44.9%), 61 (36.5%), and 31 (18.6%) were classified to have light, medium, or heavy work intensity, respectively. Postoperatively, 73.7% (123/167) of them RTW at a median time of four months (IQR 2 to 7). Of those who RTW, 9.8% of patients (12/123) had to change occupation to less demanding jobs. Patients with high-intensity jobs had a lower RTW rate (19/31; 61.3%) compared with those with light (59/75; 78.7%) and medium-intensity jobs (45/61; 73.8%). Patients who RTW had better pre- and postoperative outcomes as well as greater improvement in relative CS (76% vs 34%; p < 0.001), CS for pain (14 vs 7 with 15 as best value; p < 0.001), and SSV (75% vs 20%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that absence of preoperative sick leave (OR 6.81 (95% CI 2.63 to 19.4); p < 0.001) was associated with higher RTW rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than two-thirds of preoperatively working patients were able to RTW after RTSA, depending on work intensity. Higher RTW rates were seen in patients who were not on sick leave preoperatively. This information is highly relevant for the surgeon to counsel patients accordingly and possibly limit expectations, especially in heavy workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 9\",\"pages\":\"915-923\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1587.R2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1587.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是分析逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)植入术后恢复工作(RTW)的能力,特别关注重体力劳动者。方法:回顾性评估2005年9月至2021年10月期间接受RTSA的所有年龄小于60岁的工作患者的RTW能力。收集患者的基本人口统计信息、工作强度、工作变化情况、术前病假情况。术前和随访两年,采用Constant-Murley评分(CS)和主观肩值(SSV)、并发症和翻修手术来评估结果。采用Logistic回归分析预测RTW。结果:209例符合条件的患者中有167例在手术时就业,中位年龄55岁(IQR 50.3 ~ 57.8),女性占34.1% (n = 57),其中轻、中、重度工作强度分别为75例(44.9%)、61例(36.5%)和31例(18.6%)。术后73.7%(123/167)患者中位时间为4个月(IQR 2 ~ 7)。在转职的患者中,9.8%(12/123)的患者不得不转行从事要求较低的工作。与轻度(59/75;78.7%)和中度(45/61;73.8%)相比,高强度工作的患者RTW率(19/31;61.3%)较低。RTW患者有更好的术前和术后预后,以及相对CS (76% vs 34%, p < 0.001)、疼痛CS (14 vs 7,最佳值15,p < 0.001)和SSV (75% vs 20%, p < 0.001)的更大改善。Logistic回归分析显示术前病假缺勤(OR 6.81 (95% CI 2.63 ~ 19.4);p < 0.001)与较高的RTW发生率相关。结论:超过三分之二的术前工作患者在RTSA后能够进行RTW,这取决于工作强度。术前未请病假的患者RTW率较高。这些信息与外科医生对患者的建议高度相关,并可能限制期望,特别是对繁重的工人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Satisfactory return to work rates after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Aims: The aim was to analyze the ability to return to work (RTW) after implantation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with special attention to heavy labourers.

Methods: All working patients younger than 60 years of age who underwent RTSA between September 2005 and October 2021 were retrospectively evaluated for their ability to RTW. Basic demographic information, job intensity, change of work, and preoperative sick leave were collected. Constant-Murley score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) preoperatively and at two years' follow-up, complications, and revision surgeries were used to evaluate the outcome. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict RTW.

Results: A total of 167 of 209 eligible patients were employed at the time of surgery (median age 55 years (IQR 50.3 to 57.8), 34.1% (n = 57) female), of whom 75 (44.9%), 61 (36.5%), and 31 (18.6%) were classified to have light, medium, or heavy work intensity, respectively. Postoperatively, 73.7% (123/167) of them RTW at a median time of four months (IQR 2 to 7). Of those who RTW, 9.8% of patients (12/123) had to change occupation to less demanding jobs. Patients with high-intensity jobs had a lower RTW rate (19/31; 61.3%) compared with those with light (59/75; 78.7%) and medium-intensity jobs (45/61; 73.8%). Patients who RTW had better pre- and postoperative outcomes as well as greater improvement in relative CS (76% vs 34%; p < 0.001), CS for pain (14 vs 7 with 15 as best value; p < 0.001), and SSV (75% vs 20%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that absence of preoperative sick leave (OR 6.81 (95% CI 2.63 to 19.4); p < 0.001) was associated with higher RTW rates.

Conclusion: More than two-thirds of preoperatively working patients were able to RTW after RTSA, depending on work intensity. Higher RTW rates were seen in patients who were not on sick leave preoperatively. This information is highly relevant for the surgeon to counsel patients accordingly and possibly limit expectations, especially in heavy workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信