在不同的澳大利亚老年护理环境中使用辅助生活技术的现实挑战:用户体验的定性研究。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2591-4016
Nida Afzal, Amy D Nguyen, Annie Lau
{"title":"在不同的澳大利亚老年护理环境中使用辅助生活技术的现实挑战:用户体验的定性研究。","authors":"Nida Afzal, Amy D Nguyen, Annie Lau","doi":"10.1055/a-2591-4016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aging populations strain health care systems. Assisted Living Technologies (ALTs) emerge as a potential solution for promoting independent living among older adults. However, the real-world effect of ALTs remains unclear.This study explores benefits and challenges (anticipated and unanticipated) of ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers across three aged care settings (residential aged care facilities [RACFs], retirement villages [RVs], and home-dwelling communities [HDCs]) in Australia.Three ALTs (fall detection sensors, sleep monitors, and smartwatches) were deployed across three settings. NASSS framework (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability), informed by sociotechnical theories, guided analysis of the interplay between technology, user needs, and caregiving context in ALTs implementation. Semistructured interviews with 14 older adults and 9 caregivers from 19 households explored user experiences. Benefits and challenges of using ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers were categorized using the consequences framework.Setting-specific challenges alongside common benefits and challenges across care settings were revealed. The NASSS framework analysis showed how technology limitations, user needs, and caregiving context influenced these outcomes. In RACFs, where residents receive constant nursing assistance, informal caregivers faced uncertainty regarding who was responsible for monitoring residents. In RVs, with a strong sense of community, informal caregivers (often neighbors) were more prone to overreacting to false alarms. Shared sleeping arrangements among HDCs made interpreting sleep data challenging.Implementing ALTs in elderly care settings requires a context-sensitive approach. In RACFs, clear role definitions for informal caregivers and staff are essential. For RVs, design should support help-seeking aligned with residents' social and geographical contexts. Home-dwelling settings may benefit from advanced sleep monitoring tailored to shared living arrangements. Future ALTs development should focus on real-world contexts to promote successful aging in place.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"930-942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Challenges of Using Assisted Living Technologies across Different Australian Aged Care Settings: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Nida Afzal, Amy D Nguyen, Annie Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2591-4016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aging populations strain health care systems. Assisted Living Technologies (ALTs) emerge as a potential solution for promoting independent living among older adults. However, the real-world effect of ALTs remains unclear.This study explores benefits and challenges (anticipated and unanticipated) of ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers across three aged care settings (residential aged care facilities [RACFs], retirement villages [RVs], and home-dwelling communities [HDCs]) in Australia.Three ALTs (fall detection sensors, sleep monitors, and smartwatches) were deployed across three settings. NASSS framework (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability), informed by sociotechnical theories, guided analysis of the interplay between technology, user needs, and caregiving context in ALTs implementation. Semistructured interviews with 14 older adults and 9 caregivers from 19 households explored user experiences. Benefits and challenges of using ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers were categorized using the consequences framework.Setting-specific challenges alongside common benefits and challenges across care settings were revealed. The NASSS framework analysis showed how technology limitations, user needs, and caregiving context influenced these outcomes. In RACFs, where residents receive constant nursing assistance, informal caregivers faced uncertainty regarding who was responsible for monitoring residents. In RVs, with a strong sense of community, informal caregivers (often neighbors) were more prone to overreacting to false alarms. Shared sleeping arrangements among HDCs made interpreting sleep data challenging.Implementing ALTs in elderly care settings requires a context-sensitive approach. In RACFs, clear role definitions for informal caregivers and staff are essential. For RVs, design should support help-seeking aligned with residents' social and geographical contexts. Home-dwelling settings may benefit from advanced sleep monitoring tailored to shared living arrangements. Future ALTs development should focus on real-world contexts to promote successful aging in place.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"930-942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-4016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-4016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人口老龄化给医疗保健系统带来压力。辅助生活技术(ALTs)成为促进老年人独立生活的潜在解决方案。然而,alt对现实世界的影响仍不清楚。本研究探讨了澳大利亚三种老年护理环境(住宅老年护理设施[racf],退休村[rv]和家庭居住社区[HDCs])中老年人和非正式护理人员的alt的好处和挑战(预期和未预期)。三种alt(跌倒检测传感器、睡眠监视器和智能手表)被部署在三种设置中。NASSS框架(不采用、放弃、扩大规模、传播和可持续性)在社会技术理论的指导下,指导了人工智能技术实施中技术、用户需求和护理环境之间相互作用的分析。对来自19个家庭的14名老年人和9名护理人员进行了半结构化访谈,探讨了用户体验。使用后果框架对老年人和非正式护理人员使用alt的好处和挑战进行了分类。揭示了在护理环境中设置特定挑战以及共同利益和挑战。NASSS框架分析显示了技术限制、用户需求和护理环境如何影响这些结果。在居民得到持续护理援助的乡村社区,非正式护理人员面临着谁负责监测居民的不确定性。在有强烈社区意识的房车里,非正式的看护者(通常是邻居)更容易对假警报反应过度。高收入国家之间共享睡眠安排使得解释睡眠数据具有挑战性。在老年护理环境中实施人工智能治疗需要一种对环境敏感的方法。在区域协调基金中,非正式照顾者和工作人员的明确角色定义至关重要。对于房车来说,设计应该支持与居民的社会和地理环境相一致的求助。家庭居住环境可能受益于为共享生活安排量身定制的先进睡眠监测。未来人工智能的发展应着眼于现实环境,以促进成功的老龄化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Challenges of Using Assisted Living Technologies across Different Australian Aged Care Settings: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences.

Aging populations strain health care systems. Assisted Living Technologies (ALTs) emerge as a potential solution for promoting independent living among older adults. However, the real-world effect of ALTs remains unclear.This study explores benefits and challenges (anticipated and unanticipated) of ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers across three aged care settings (residential aged care facilities [RACFs], retirement villages [RVs], and home-dwelling communities [HDCs]) in Australia.Three ALTs (fall detection sensors, sleep monitors, and smartwatches) were deployed across three settings. NASSS framework (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability), informed by sociotechnical theories, guided analysis of the interplay between technology, user needs, and caregiving context in ALTs implementation. Semistructured interviews with 14 older adults and 9 caregivers from 19 households explored user experiences. Benefits and challenges of using ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers were categorized using the consequences framework.Setting-specific challenges alongside common benefits and challenges across care settings were revealed. The NASSS framework analysis showed how technology limitations, user needs, and caregiving context influenced these outcomes. In RACFs, where residents receive constant nursing assistance, informal caregivers faced uncertainty regarding who was responsible for monitoring residents. In RVs, with a strong sense of community, informal caregivers (often neighbors) were more prone to overreacting to false alarms. Shared sleeping arrangements among HDCs made interpreting sleep data challenging.Implementing ALTs in elderly care settings requires a context-sensitive approach. In RACFs, clear role definitions for informal caregivers and staff are essential. For RVs, design should support help-seeking aligned with residents' social and geographical contexts. Home-dwelling settings may benefit from advanced sleep monitoring tailored to shared living arrangements. Future ALTs development should focus on real-world contexts to promote successful aging in place.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信