脱位关节病患者接受反向肩关节置换术的临床结果:一项匹配的病例对照研究。

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Sarah I Goldfarb, Laurence Okeke, Piotr Łukasiewicz, Prashant Meshram, James H Padley, Edward G McFarland
{"title":"脱位关节病患者接受反向肩关节置换术的临床结果:一项匹配的病例对照研究。","authors":"Sarah I Goldfarb, Laurence Okeke, Piotr Łukasiewicz, Prashant Meshram, James H Padley, Edward G McFarland","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1328.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder is an advanced arthritis resulting from recurrent glenohumeral dislocation with or without previous stabilization surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with dislocation arthropathy with those with primary osteoarthritis (OA) and glenoid bone loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective matched cohort study including 22 patients with dislocation arthropathy who were treated by one surgeon between 2011 and 2021 and a matched group of 44 patients who were also treated with RTSA, for OA. All patients had a minimum follow-up of two years and were treated with one of two RTSA systems, both with a lateralized glenoid sphere, a 135° neck-shaft angle and an uncemented humeral component, but differing by inlay versus onlay humeral tray. The glenoids were reamed eccentrically until there was at least 90% cover of the baseplate. No bone grafting or augmented glenoid components were used. Range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implant survival at final follow-up was 100% in the dislocation arthropathy group and 98% in the OA group. Both groups showed significant improvements in all PROMs and all ROMs, and there was no significant difference in these improvements between the groups. The complication rate was similar in the two groups (9% in the dislocation arthropathy group and 11% in the OA group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical results of RTSA performed in patients with dislocation arthropathy were comparable to those in a matched group of patients with OA. Although these findings suggest that RTSA is a successful surgical treatment for patients with dislocation arthropathy, longer follow-up is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 9","pages":"924-930"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for dislocation arthropathy : a matched case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah I Goldfarb, Laurence Okeke, Piotr Łukasiewicz, Prashant Meshram, James H Padley, Edward G McFarland\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1328.R2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder is an advanced arthritis resulting from recurrent glenohumeral dislocation with or without previous stabilization surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with dislocation arthropathy with those with primary osteoarthritis (OA) and glenoid bone loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective matched cohort study including 22 patients with dislocation arthropathy who were treated by one surgeon between 2011 and 2021 and a matched group of 44 patients who were also treated with RTSA, for OA. All patients had a minimum follow-up of two years and were treated with one of two RTSA systems, both with a lateralized glenoid sphere, a 135° neck-shaft angle and an uncemented humeral component, but differing by inlay versus onlay humeral tray. The glenoids were reamed eccentrically until there was at least 90% cover of the baseplate. No bone grafting or augmented glenoid components were used. Range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implant survival at final follow-up was 100% in the dislocation arthropathy group and 98% in the OA group. Both groups showed significant improvements in all PROMs and all ROMs, and there was no significant difference in these improvements between the groups. The complication rate was similar in the two groups (9% in the dislocation arthropathy group and 11% in the OA group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical results of RTSA performed in patients with dislocation arthropathy were comparable to those in a matched group of patients with OA. Although these findings suggest that RTSA is a successful surgical treatment for patients with dislocation arthropathy, longer follow-up is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 9\",\"pages\":\"924-930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1328.R2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B9.BJJ-2024-1328.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脱位性肩关节病是一种由复发性肩关节脱位引起的晚期关节炎,以前是否进行过稳定手术。本研究的目的是比较脱位关节病患者与原发性骨关节炎(OA)和关节盂骨丢失患者逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的临床结果。方法:这是一项回顾性匹配队列研究,包括22名脱位关节病患者,他们在2011年至2021年期间接受了一名外科医生的治疗,以及44名同样接受RTSA治疗的OA患者。所有患者至少随访2年,并接受两种RTSA系统中的一种治疗,两种系统均具有侧化的盂骨球、135°颈轴角和未骨水泥肱骨假体,但不同的是内嵌式和外嵌式肱骨托盘。关节盂被偏心地扩孔,直到至少90%的钢板被覆盖。未使用植骨或增强关节盂假体。术前和最后随访时记录活动范围(ROM)和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。结果:脱位关节病组最终随访时种植体成活率为100%,OA组为98%。两组在所有prom和rom方面均有显著改善,且两组之间在这些改善方面无显著差异。两组的并发症发生率相似(脱位关节病组9%,OA组11%)。结论:脱位关节病患者进行RTSA的临床结果与匹配组OA患者相当。虽然这些发现表明RTSA是脱位关节病患者的一种成功的手术治疗方法,但需要更长的随访时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for dislocation arthropathy : a matched case-control study.

Aims: Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder is an advanced arthritis resulting from recurrent glenohumeral dislocation with or without previous stabilization surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in patients with dislocation arthropathy with those with primary osteoarthritis (OA) and glenoid bone loss.

Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort study including 22 patients with dislocation arthropathy who were treated by one surgeon between 2011 and 2021 and a matched group of 44 patients who were also treated with RTSA, for OA. All patients had a minimum follow-up of two years and were treated with one of two RTSA systems, both with a lateralized glenoid sphere, a 135° neck-shaft angle and an uncemented humeral component, but differing by inlay versus onlay humeral tray. The glenoids were reamed eccentrically until there was at least 90% cover of the baseplate. No bone grafting or augmented glenoid components were used. Range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded preoperatively and at final follow-up.

Results: Implant survival at final follow-up was 100% in the dislocation arthropathy group and 98% in the OA group. Both groups showed significant improvements in all PROMs and all ROMs, and there was no significant difference in these improvements between the groups. The complication rate was similar in the two groups (9% in the dislocation arthropathy group and 11% in the OA group).

Conclusion: The clinical results of RTSA performed in patients with dislocation arthropathy were comparable to those in a matched group of patients with OA. Although these findings suggest that RTSA is a successful surgical treatment for patients with dislocation arthropathy, longer follow-up is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信