日本血液(液体)生物标志物检测的全国实际使用情况。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Cancer Science Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1111/cas.70174
Yasushi Yatabe, Ryosuke Watanabe, Yuko Kotera, Shotaro Yasuoka, Daisuke Ennishi
{"title":"日本血液(液体)生物标志物检测的全国实际使用情况。","authors":"Yasushi Yatabe, Ryosuke Watanabe, Yuko Kotera, Shotaro Yasuoka, Daisuke Ennishi","doi":"10.1111/cas.70174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the advances in precision oncology through biomarker testing, not all patients are able to benefit from treatment decisions guided by tissue-based testing like comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, the application and integration of liquid biopsy testing into clinical practice has not been fully defined in Japan. Clinical records were retrieved from the data repository of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) in Japan. All records related to FoundationOne Liquid tests were evaluated from the database's inception in June 2019 to June 2023. Outcomes of interest included treatment patterns before and after testing, as well as mutations of interest. The seven most frequent tumor types (pancreas, prostate, biliary tract, bowel, lung, stomach and ovary) were stratified as part of subgroup analyses. Of 7461 patient records, the most prevalent cancers were pancreatic (24.5%), prostate (15.8%), and biliary tract (11.2%) cancers. Following molecular tumor board (MTB) review, 5.8% of cases received new treatments, predominantly targeted therapy (41.7%) and chemotherapy (40.9%), with 2.1% participating in clinical trials. Median durations from specimen collection to post-MTB treatment were 63 days. Tests for patients with bowel cancer (70/796; 8.8%) and lung cancer (57/695; 8.2%) received genotype-matched treatment most frequently, followed by tests for patients with prostate cancer (92/1182; 7.8%). Access to CGP in Japan appears more limited compared to other high-income countries. While CGP may be valuable for certain cancers, such as bowel, biliary, and prostate cancer, its benefit for other cancer types remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":48943,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Yasushi Yatabe, Ryosuke Watanabe, Yuko Kotera, Shotaro Yasuoka, Daisuke Ennishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cas.70174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the advances in precision oncology through biomarker testing, not all patients are able to benefit from treatment decisions guided by tissue-based testing like comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, the application and integration of liquid biopsy testing into clinical practice has not been fully defined in Japan. Clinical records were retrieved from the data repository of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) in Japan. All records related to FoundationOne Liquid tests were evaluated from the database's inception in June 2019 to June 2023. Outcomes of interest included treatment patterns before and after testing, as well as mutations of interest. The seven most frequent tumor types (pancreas, prostate, biliary tract, bowel, lung, stomach and ovary) were stratified as part of subgroup analyses. Of 7461 patient records, the most prevalent cancers were pancreatic (24.5%), prostate (15.8%), and biliary tract (11.2%) cancers. Following molecular tumor board (MTB) review, 5.8% of cases received new treatments, predominantly targeted therapy (41.7%) and chemotherapy (40.9%), with 2.1% participating in clinical trials. Median durations from specimen collection to post-MTB treatment were 63 days. Tests for patients with bowel cancer (70/796; 8.8%) and lung cancer (57/695; 8.2%) received genotype-matched treatment most frequently, followed by tests for patients with prostate cancer (92/1182; 7.8%). Access to CGP in Japan appears more limited compared to other high-income countries. While CGP may be valuable for certain cancers, such as bowel, biliary, and prostate cancer, its benefit for other cancer types remains unclear.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管通过生物标志物检测在精确肿瘤学方面取得了进展,但并非所有患者都能从基于组织的测试(如全面基因组分析(CGP))指导的治疗决策中受益。然而,在日本,液体活检检测在临床实践中的应用和整合尚未得到充分界定。临床记录从日本癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心(C-CAT)的数据存储库中检索。从2019年6月到2023年6月,所有与FoundationOne Liquid测试相关的记录都进行了评估。感兴趣的结果包括测试前后的治疗模式,以及感兴趣的突变。7种最常见的肿瘤类型(胰腺、前列腺、胆道、肠、肺、胃和卵巢)被分层作为亚组分析的一部分。在7461例患者记录中,最常见的癌症是胰腺癌(24.5%)、前列腺癌(15.8%)和胆道癌(11.2%)。在分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)审查后,5.8%的病例接受了新的治疗,主要是靶向治疗(41.7%)和化疗(40.9%),其中2.1%参加了临床试验。从标本采集到结核分枝杆菌治疗后的中位持续时间为63天。肠癌患者(70/796,8.8%)和肺癌患者(57/695,8.2%)接受基因型匹配治疗的频率最高,其次是前列腺癌患者(92/1182,7.8%)。与其他高收入国家相比,日本获得CGP的机会似乎更为有限。虽然CGP可能对某些癌症有价值,如肠癌、胆道癌和前列腺癌,但它对其他类型癌症的益处尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.

Despite the advances in precision oncology through biomarker testing, not all patients are able to benefit from treatment decisions guided by tissue-based testing like comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, the application and integration of liquid biopsy testing into clinical practice has not been fully defined in Japan. Clinical records were retrieved from the data repository of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) in Japan. All records related to FoundationOne Liquid tests were evaluated from the database's inception in June 2019 to June 2023. Outcomes of interest included treatment patterns before and after testing, as well as mutations of interest. The seven most frequent tumor types (pancreas, prostate, biliary tract, bowel, lung, stomach and ovary) were stratified as part of subgroup analyses. Of 7461 patient records, the most prevalent cancers were pancreatic (24.5%), prostate (15.8%), and biliary tract (11.2%) cancers. Following molecular tumor board (MTB) review, 5.8% of cases received new treatments, predominantly targeted therapy (41.7%) and chemotherapy (40.9%), with 2.1% participating in clinical trials. Median durations from specimen collection to post-MTB treatment were 63 days. Tests for patients with bowel cancer (70/796; 8.8%) and lung cancer (57/695; 8.2%) received genotype-matched treatment most frequently, followed by tests for patients with prostate cancer (92/1182; 7.8%). Access to CGP in Japan appears more limited compared to other high-income countries. While CGP may be valuable for certain cancers, such as bowel, biliary, and prostate cancer, its benefit for other cancer types remains unclear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信