筛选、识别和纠正故障中断警报的系统方法。

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2646-6297
EzzAddin Al Wahsh, Justin Juskewitch, Carol Eichenlaub, Courtney Holbrook, Pedro J Caraballo
{"title":"筛选、识别和纠正故障中断警报的系统方法。","authors":"EzzAddin Al Wahsh, Justin Juskewitch, Carol Eichenlaub, Courtney Holbrook, Pedro J Caraballo","doi":"10.1055/a-2646-6297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interruptive alerts can negatively impact clinical workflows and contribute to alert fatigue, provider frustration, and burnout. Given that interruptive alert overriding is a heterogeneous and recurring phenomenon, occurring across different organizational contexts with varying characteristics and circumstances, we hypothesize a pragmatic approach with multimodal interventions to address malfunctioning alert populations and maintain those contributing to better patient care.This study aimed to develop a systematic approach to screen, identify, and correct malfunctioning interruptive alerts within a tertiary healthcare system.We performed screening by assessing the alert population, exploring available resources, and defining alert population inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified interruptive alerts and then conducted an exploratory analysis. We shared insights from discussions with our expert panel to validate our findings and find gaps in current alert monitoring. We then performed focus groups and interviews as part of a root cause analysis. To address the findings of these investigations, we prioritized which alerts to improve, evaluated solutions, and recommended steps to improve our governance structure.We developed an approach to assess around 1,500 unique alerts in a tertiary center from January to June 2023. We introduced two approaches to visually analyze alert populations: alert-focused analysis and people- and systems-focused analysis. We utilized an expert panel to further enhance the power and speed of alert evaluation and then investigated one emerging alert with focus groups, identifying root causes for its malfunction. This alert demonstrated how enterprise practice changes, coupled with design and cultural issues, can trigger significant alert malfunctions.A multi-modal intervention approach is needed to evaluate interruptive alerts and act quickly on findings. Utilizing both analytical and nonanalytical methods can work in synergy to facilitate this framework. Such approaches may reduce time and be valuable tools for optimally allocating resources to tackle institutional alert challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"863-871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Approach to Screen, Identify, and Correct Malfunctioning Interruptive Alerts.\",\"authors\":\"EzzAddin Al Wahsh, Justin Juskewitch, Carol Eichenlaub, Courtney Holbrook, Pedro J Caraballo\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2646-6297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interruptive alerts can negatively impact clinical workflows and contribute to alert fatigue, provider frustration, and burnout. Given that interruptive alert overriding is a heterogeneous and recurring phenomenon, occurring across different organizational contexts with varying characteristics and circumstances, we hypothesize a pragmatic approach with multimodal interventions to address malfunctioning alert populations and maintain those contributing to better patient care.This study aimed to develop a systematic approach to screen, identify, and correct malfunctioning interruptive alerts within a tertiary healthcare system.We performed screening by assessing the alert population, exploring available resources, and defining alert population inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified interruptive alerts and then conducted an exploratory analysis. We shared insights from discussions with our expert panel to validate our findings and find gaps in current alert monitoring. We then performed focus groups and interviews as part of a root cause analysis. To address the findings of these investigations, we prioritized which alerts to improve, evaluated solutions, and recommended steps to improve our governance structure.We developed an approach to assess around 1,500 unique alerts in a tertiary center from January to June 2023. We introduced two approaches to visually analyze alert populations: alert-focused analysis and people- and systems-focused analysis. We utilized an expert panel to further enhance the power and speed of alert evaluation and then investigated one emerging alert with focus groups, identifying root causes for its malfunction. This alert demonstrated how enterprise practice changes, coupled with design and cultural issues, can trigger significant alert malfunctions.A multi-modal intervention approach is needed to evaluate interruptive alerts and act quickly on findings. Utilizing both analytical and nonanalytical methods can work in synergy to facilitate this framework. Such approaches may reduce time and be valuable tools for optimally allocating resources to tackle institutional alert challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"863-871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367368/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2646-6297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2646-6297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中断警报会对临床工作流程产生负面影响,并导致警报疲劳、提供者沮丧和倦怠。鉴于中断警报覆盖是一种异质性和反复出现的现象,发生在不同的组织环境中,具有不同的特征和环境,我们假设了一种实用的方法,采用多模式干预来解决故障警报人群,并维持那些有助于更好地护理患者的人群。本研究旨在开发一种系统的方法来筛选、识别和纠正三级医疗保健系统中的故障中断警报。我们通过评估警戒人群、探索可用资源、定义警戒人群纳入和排除标准来进行筛查。我们确定了中断警报,然后进行了探索性分析。我们分享了与专家小组讨论的见解,以验证我们的发现并发现当前警报监测中的差距。然后我们进行焦点小组和访谈,作为根本原因分析的一部分。为了解决这些调查的结果,我们对需要改进的警报进行了优先级排序,评估了解决方案,并建议了改进治理结构的步骤。我们开发了一种方法来评估2023年1月至6月在三级中心的大约1500个独特警报。我们介绍了两种可视化分析警报人群的方法:以警报为中心的分析和以人和系统为中心的分析。我们利用专家小组进一步提高警报评估的能力和速度,然后对一个新出现的警报进行焦点小组调查,找出其故障的根本原因。这个警报演示了企业实践的变化,加上设计和文化问题,是如何引发严重的警报故障的。需要一种多模式干预方法来评估中断警报并根据发现迅速采取行动。利用分析和非分析方法可以协同工作,以促进这一框架。这种方法可以减少时间,并成为最佳分配资源以应对机构警报挑战的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Systematic Approach to Screen, Identify, and Correct Malfunctioning Interruptive Alerts.

A Systematic Approach to Screen, Identify, and Correct Malfunctioning Interruptive Alerts.

A Systematic Approach to Screen, Identify, and Correct Malfunctioning Interruptive Alerts.

Interruptive alerts can negatively impact clinical workflows and contribute to alert fatigue, provider frustration, and burnout. Given that interruptive alert overriding is a heterogeneous and recurring phenomenon, occurring across different organizational contexts with varying characteristics and circumstances, we hypothesize a pragmatic approach with multimodal interventions to address malfunctioning alert populations and maintain those contributing to better patient care.This study aimed to develop a systematic approach to screen, identify, and correct malfunctioning interruptive alerts within a tertiary healthcare system.We performed screening by assessing the alert population, exploring available resources, and defining alert population inclusion and exclusion criteria. We identified interruptive alerts and then conducted an exploratory analysis. We shared insights from discussions with our expert panel to validate our findings and find gaps in current alert monitoring. We then performed focus groups and interviews as part of a root cause analysis. To address the findings of these investigations, we prioritized which alerts to improve, evaluated solutions, and recommended steps to improve our governance structure.We developed an approach to assess around 1,500 unique alerts in a tertiary center from January to June 2023. We introduced two approaches to visually analyze alert populations: alert-focused analysis and people- and systems-focused analysis. We utilized an expert panel to further enhance the power and speed of alert evaluation and then investigated one emerging alert with focus groups, identifying root causes for its malfunction. This alert demonstrated how enterprise practice changes, coupled with design and cultural issues, can trigger significant alert malfunctions.A multi-modal intervention approach is needed to evaluate interruptive alerts and act quickly on findings. Utilizing both analytical and nonanalytical methods can work in synergy to facilitate this framework. Such approaches may reduce time and be valuable tools for optimally allocating resources to tackle institutional alert challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信