不同人工智能系统对小儿内分泌学家评估的矮小身材相关问题的反应。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Kamber Kaşali, Özgür Fırat Özpolat, Merve Ülkü, Ayşe Sena Dönmez, Serap Kılıç Kaya, Esra Dişçi, Serkan Bilge Koca, Ufuk Özkaya, Hüseyin Demirbilek, Atilla Çayır
{"title":"不同人工智能系统对小儿内分泌学家评估的矮小身材相关问题的反应。","authors":"Kamber Kaşali, Özgür Fırat Özpolat, Merve Ülkü, Ayşe Sena Dönmez, Serap Kılıç Kaya, Esra Dişçi, Serkan Bilge Koca, Ufuk Özkaya, Hüseyin Demirbilek, Atilla Çayır","doi":"10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-6-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in medicine, including pediatric endocrinology. AI models have the potential to support clinical decision-making, patient education, and guidance. However, their accuracy, reliability, and effectiveness in providing medical information and recommendations remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of four AI models-ChatGPT, Bard, Microsoft Copilot, and Pi-in answering frequently asked questions related to pediatric endocrinology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine questions commonly asked by parents regarding short stature in paediatric endocrinology have been selected based on literature reviews and expert opinions. These questions were posed to four AI models in both Turkish and English. The AI-generated responses were evaluated by 10 pediatric endocrinologists using a 12-item Likert-scale questionnaire assessing medical accuracy, completeness, guidance, and informativeness. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc tests, were conducted to determine significant differences between AI models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bard outperformed other models in guidance and recommendation categories, excelling in directing users to medical consultation. Microsoft Copilot demonstrated strong medical accuracy but lacked guidance capacity. ChatGPT showed consistent performance in knowledge dissemination, making it effective for patient education. Pi scored the lowest in guidance and recommendations, indicating limited applicability in clinical settings. Significant differences were observed among AI models (p < 0.05), particularly in completeness and guidance-related categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the varying strengths and weaknesses of AI models in pediatric endocrinology. While Bard is effective in guidance, Microsoft Copilot excels in accuracy, and ChatGPT is informative. Future AI improvements should focus on balancing accuracy and guidance to enhance clinical decision-support and patient education. Tailored AI applications may optimize AI's role in specialized medical fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":48805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responses of Different Artificial Intelligence Systems to Questions Related with Short Stature as Assessed by Pediatric Endocrinologists.\",\"authors\":\"Kamber Kaşali, Özgür Fırat Özpolat, Merve Ülkü, Ayşe Sena Dönmez, Serap Kılıç Kaya, Esra Dişçi, Serkan Bilge Koca, Ufuk Özkaya, Hüseyin Demirbilek, Atilla Çayır\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-6-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in medicine, including pediatric endocrinology. AI models have the potential to support clinical decision-making, patient education, and guidance. However, their accuracy, reliability, and effectiveness in providing medical information and recommendations remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of four AI models-ChatGPT, Bard, Microsoft Copilot, and Pi-in answering frequently asked questions related to pediatric endocrinology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine questions commonly asked by parents regarding short stature in paediatric endocrinology have been selected based on literature reviews and expert opinions. These questions were posed to four AI models in both Turkish and English. The AI-generated responses were evaluated by 10 pediatric endocrinologists using a 12-item Likert-scale questionnaire assessing medical accuracy, completeness, guidance, and informativeness. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc tests, were conducted to determine significant differences between AI models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bard outperformed other models in guidance and recommendation categories, excelling in directing users to medical consultation. Microsoft Copilot demonstrated strong medical accuracy but lacked guidance capacity. ChatGPT showed consistent performance in knowledge dissemination, making it effective for patient education. Pi scored the lowest in guidance and recommendations, indicating limited applicability in clinical settings. Significant differences were observed among AI models (p < 0.05), particularly in completeness and guidance-related categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the varying strengths and weaknesses of AI models in pediatric endocrinology. While Bard is effective in guidance, Microsoft Copilot excels in accuracy, and ChatGPT is informative. Future AI improvements should focus on balancing accuracy and guidance to enhance clinical decision-support and patient education. Tailored AI applications may optimize AI's role in specialized medical fields.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-6-14\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-6-14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于医学,包括儿科内分泌学。人工智能模型具有支持临床决策、患者教育和指导的潜力。然而,它们在提供医疗信息和建议方面的准确性、可靠性和有效性仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估和比较chatgpt、Bard、Microsoft Copilot和pi四种人工智能模型在回答儿科内分泌相关常见问题中的性能。方法:结合文献资料和专家意见,选取儿童内分泌科家长常见的9个身高不足问题。这些问题用土耳其语和英语向四个人工智能模型提出。人工智能生成的回答由10名儿科内分泌学家使用12项李克特量表评估医疗准确性、完整性、指导性和信息性。通过统计分析,包括Kruskal-Wallis和事后检验,确定人工智能模型之间的显著差异。结果:Bard在引导和推荐类别上优于其他模型,在引导用户进行医疗咨询方面表现突出。微软副驾驶显示出很强的医疗准确性,但缺乏制导能力。ChatGPT在知识传播方面表现一致,对患者教育效果显著。Pi在指导和建议方面得分最低,表明在临床环境中的适用性有限。人工智能模型之间的差异显著(p < 0.05),特别是在完整性和指南相关类别方面。结论:本研究突出了人工智能模型在儿科内分泌学中的不同优势和劣势。虽然巴德在引导方面很有效,但微软的Copilot在准确性方面表现出色,而ChatGPT则提供了丰富的信息。未来的人工智能改进应侧重于平衡准确性和指导,以加强临床决策支持和患者教育。量身定制的人工智能应用可以优化人工智能在专业医疗领域的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responses of Different Artificial Intelligence Systems to Questions Related with Short Stature as Assessed by Pediatric Endocrinologists.

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly utilized in medicine, including pediatric endocrinology. AI models have the potential to support clinical decision-making, patient education, and guidance. However, their accuracy, reliability, and effectiveness in providing medical information and recommendations remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of four AI models-ChatGPT, Bard, Microsoft Copilot, and Pi-in answering frequently asked questions related to pediatric endocrinology.

Methods: Nine questions commonly asked by parents regarding short stature in paediatric endocrinology have been selected based on literature reviews and expert opinions. These questions were posed to four AI models in both Turkish and English. The AI-generated responses were evaluated by 10 pediatric endocrinologists using a 12-item Likert-scale questionnaire assessing medical accuracy, completeness, guidance, and informativeness. Statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc tests, were conducted to determine significant differences between AI models.

Results: Bard outperformed other models in guidance and recommendation categories, excelling in directing users to medical consultation. Microsoft Copilot demonstrated strong medical accuracy but lacked guidance capacity. ChatGPT showed consistent performance in knowledge dissemination, making it effective for patient education. Pi scored the lowest in guidance and recommendations, indicating limited applicability in clinical settings. Significant differences were observed among AI models (p < 0.05), particularly in completeness and guidance-related categories.

Conclusion: The study highlights the varying strengths and weaknesses of AI models in pediatric endocrinology. While Bard is effective in guidance, Microsoft Copilot excels in accuracy, and ChatGPT is informative. Future AI improvements should focus on balancing accuracy and guidance to enhance clinical decision-support and patient education. Tailored AI applications may optimize AI's role in specialized medical fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology
Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology (JCRPE) publishes original research articles, reviews, short communications, letters, case reports and other special features related to the field of pediatric endocrinology. JCRPE is published in English by the Turkish Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Society quarterly (March, June, September, December). The target audience is physicians, researchers and other healthcare professionals in all areas of pediatric endocrinology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信