瓦里安直线加速器6MV光子光束头部散射校正因子最优值的Radcalc测量与应用

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Neil Richmond, Katie Chester, Craig Macdougall
{"title":"瓦里安直线加速器6MV光子光束头部散射校正因子最优值的Radcalc测量与应用","authors":"Neil Richmond, Katie Chester, Craig Macdougall","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01629-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine the optimum value of head scatter correction factor ([Formula: see text]) used in Radcalc software. The head scatter factors for a selection of multi-leaf collimator fields were measured on a Varian TrueBeam Edge and TrueBeam linear accelerators using an ionisation chamber in a mini-phantom. Radcalc calculated the head scatter values for the same fields. Radcalc calculates head scatter as [Formula: see text]. The head scatter value from Radcalc was recorded when the value of [Formula: see text] was set to 0 or 1. An optimum value of [Formula: see text] was obtained by minimising the sum of the differences between measured and calculated. The optimum values of [Formula: see text], for each linear accelerator type, were applied to clinical patient volume modulated arc therapy calculations. Minimising the summed differences yielded optimum values of [Formula: see text] of 0.149 and 0.276 for the TrueBeam Edge and the TrueBeam datasets respectively. Applying these values to 100 clinical patient volume modulated arc therapy plans, for each linear accelerator type, reduced the mean difference between the primary calculation and the independent check from 0.55 ± 0.95% (µ ± σ) to -0.11 ± 0.85% for the TrueBeam Edge and from 0.79 ± 1.16% to 0.24 ± 0.90% for the TrueBeam plans compared to when a generic Sc value of 0.675 was used. Using optimal values of [Formula: see text]in Radcalc, determined by measurement, reduced the mean monitor unit difference when compared to the primary calculation of a treatment planning system compared to using the standard value of 0.675.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement and application of the optimum value of head scatter correction factors in Radcalc for 6MV photon beams from varian linear accelerators.\",\"authors\":\"Neil Richmond, Katie Chester, Craig Macdougall\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-025-01629-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine the optimum value of head scatter correction factor ([Formula: see text]) used in Radcalc software. The head scatter factors for a selection of multi-leaf collimator fields were measured on a Varian TrueBeam Edge and TrueBeam linear accelerators using an ionisation chamber in a mini-phantom. Radcalc calculated the head scatter values for the same fields. Radcalc calculates head scatter as [Formula: see text]. The head scatter value from Radcalc was recorded when the value of [Formula: see text] was set to 0 or 1. An optimum value of [Formula: see text] was obtained by minimising the sum of the differences between measured and calculated. The optimum values of [Formula: see text], for each linear accelerator type, were applied to clinical patient volume modulated arc therapy calculations. Minimising the summed differences yielded optimum values of [Formula: see text] of 0.149 and 0.276 for the TrueBeam Edge and the TrueBeam datasets respectively. Applying these values to 100 clinical patient volume modulated arc therapy plans, for each linear accelerator type, reduced the mean difference between the primary calculation and the independent check from 0.55 ± 0.95% (µ ± σ) to -0.11 ± 0.85% for the TrueBeam Edge and from 0.79 ± 1.16% to 0.24 ± 0.90% for the TrueBeam plans compared to when a generic Sc value of 0.675 was used. Using optimal values of [Formula: see text]in Radcalc, determined by measurement, reduced the mean monitor unit difference when compared to the primary calculation of a treatment planning system compared to using the standard value of 0.675.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01629-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01629-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定Radcalc软件中使用的头部散射校正因子([公式:见文])的最优值。在瓦里安TrueBeam Edge和TrueBeam线性加速器上,利用微型幻影中的电离室测量了多叶准直场的头部散射系数。Radcalc计算了相同字段的头部散射值。Radcalc计算头部散射为[公式:见文本]。当[公式:见文]的值设为0或1时,记录Radcalc中的头部散射值。[公式:见文本]的最优值是通过最小化测量值与计算值之间的差值之和得到的。将每种直线加速器类型的最优值[公式:见文]应用于临床患者体积调制弧治疗计算。对于TrueBeam Edge和TrueBeam数据集,最小化合计差异产生的最佳值分别为0.149和0.276[公式:见文本]。将这些值应用于100个临床患者的体积调制弧治疗方案,对于每种线性加速器类型,与使用通用Sc值0.675相比,TrueBeam Edge的初始计算和独立检查之间的平均差值从0.55±0.95%(µ±σ)减少到-0.11±0.85%,TrueBeam计划的平均差值从0.79±1.16%减少到0.24±0.90%。采用Radcalc中通过测量确定的[公式:见文]的最优值,与使用0.675标准值相比,减少了治疗计划系统初始计算时的平均监测单元差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement and application of the optimum value of head scatter correction factors in Radcalc for 6MV photon beams from varian linear accelerators.

To determine the optimum value of head scatter correction factor ([Formula: see text]) used in Radcalc software. The head scatter factors for a selection of multi-leaf collimator fields were measured on a Varian TrueBeam Edge and TrueBeam linear accelerators using an ionisation chamber in a mini-phantom. Radcalc calculated the head scatter values for the same fields. Radcalc calculates head scatter as [Formula: see text]. The head scatter value from Radcalc was recorded when the value of [Formula: see text] was set to 0 or 1. An optimum value of [Formula: see text] was obtained by minimising the sum of the differences between measured and calculated. The optimum values of [Formula: see text], for each linear accelerator type, were applied to clinical patient volume modulated arc therapy calculations. Minimising the summed differences yielded optimum values of [Formula: see text] of 0.149 and 0.276 for the TrueBeam Edge and the TrueBeam datasets respectively. Applying these values to 100 clinical patient volume modulated arc therapy plans, for each linear accelerator type, reduced the mean difference between the primary calculation and the independent check from 0.55 ± 0.95% (µ ± σ) to -0.11 ± 0.85% for the TrueBeam Edge and from 0.79 ± 1.16% to 0.24 ± 0.90% for the TrueBeam plans compared to when a generic Sc value of 0.675 was used. Using optimal values of [Formula: see text]in Radcalc, determined by measurement, reduced the mean monitor unit difference when compared to the primary calculation of a treatment planning system compared to using the standard value of 0.675.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信