环境设计研究的协作社区实践方法:姑息治疗的案例研究应用。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emil E Jonescu, Benjamin Farrell, Chamil Erik Ramanayaka, Lori Delaney, Edward Litton, Talia J Uylaki, Gareth Watts, Bella Brigham, Frances Bellemore, Davinia Seah
{"title":"环境设计研究的协作社区实践方法:姑息治疗的案例研究应用。","authors":"Emil E Jonescu, Benjamin Farrell, Chamil Erik Ramanayaka, Lori Delaney, Edward Litton, Talia J Uylaki, Gareth Watts, Bella Brigham, Frances Bellemore, Davinia Seah","doi":"10.1177/19375867251365876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental design in palliative care settings receives increasing attention, yet methodologies for studying such environments often lack interdisciplinary integration. Traditional research designs may overlook the lived expertise of clinicians and designers. <b>Objectives:</b> This article describes a collaborative, cross-disciplinary communities-of-practice model developed as a methodological framework to enable effective environmental evaluation and design processes in healthcare settings. Its application is illustrated through a case study in a palliative care unit. <b>Methods:</b> A co-designed, multi-methods approach was developed by a team of clinicians, facility managers, and academic researchers. The methodology included a scoping review, site-specific environmental data logging (sound, temperature, lighting), and co-created survey tools for staff and patients or proxies. Data were collected over two phases, following ethically approved protocols to protect privacy and support data validity. <b>Results:</b> The communities-of-practice model successfully integrated cross-sector expertise, improved the contextual relevance of study instruments, and enabled real-time, context-sensitive data collection in a high-acuity clinical setting. The method supported context-aware adaptations that would not have emerged from conventional top-down research approaches, effectively bridging academic inquiry and practical clinical application. <b>Conclusion:</b> The communities-of-practice model offers a replicable, interdisciplinary method for researching complex healthcare environments. Its case study in a palliative care unit demonstrates its capacity to generate actionable insights aligned with patient-centred outcomes. As health architecture increasingly intersects with evidence-based care delivery, such methodological approaches are vital for aligning design decisions with clinical and human-centred goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19375867251365876"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Collaborative Communities-of-Practice Methodology for Environmental Design Research: A Case Study Application in Palliative Care.\",\"authors\":\"Emil E Jonescu, Benjamin Farrell, Chamil Erik Ramanayaka, Lori Delaney, Edward Litton, Talia J Uylaki, Gareth Watts, Bella Brigham, Frances Bellemore, Davinia Seah\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19375867251365876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Environmental design in palliative care settings receives increasing attention, yet methodologies for studying such environments often lack interdisciplinary integration. Traditional research designs may overlook the lived expertise of clinicians and designers. <b>Objectives:</b> This article describes a collaborative, cross-disciplinary communities-of-practice model developed as a methodological framework to enable effective environmental evaluation and design processes in healthcare settings. Its application is illustrated through a case study in a palliative care unit. <b>Methods:</b> A co-designed, multi-methods approach was developed by a team of clinicians, facility managers, and academic researchers. The methodology included a scoping review, site-specific environmental data logging (sound, temperature, lighting), and co-created survey tools for staff and patients or proxies. Data were collected over two phases, following ethically approved protocols to protect privacy and support data validity. <b>Results:</b> The communities-of-practice model successfully integrated cross-sector expertise, improved the contextual relevance of study instruments, and enabled real-time, context-sensitive data collection in a high-acuity clinical setting. The method supported context-aware adaptations that would not have emerged from conventional top-down research approaches, effectively bridging academic inquiry and practical clinical application. <b>Conclusion:</b> The communities-of-practice model offers a replicable, interdisciplinary method for researching complex healthcare environments. Its case study in a palliative care unit demonstrates its capacity to generate actionable insights aligned with patient-centred outcomes. As health architecture increasingly intersects with evidence-based care delivery, such methodological approaches are vital for aligning design decisions with clinical and human-centred goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19375867251365876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251365876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251365876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

姑息治疗环境设计受到越来越多的关注,但研究这种环境的方法往往缺乏跨学科的整合。传统的研究设计可能忽略了临床医生和设计人员的专业知识。目的:本文描述了一个协作的、跨学科的实践社区模型,该模型是作为一种方法学框架开发的,可以在医疗保健环境中实现有效的环境评估和设计过程。它的应用是通过一个案例研究在姑息治疗单位说明。方法:由临床医生、设施管理人员和学术研究人员共同设计的多方法方法。该方法包括范围审查、特定地点的环境数据记录(声音、温度、照明),以及为员工和患者或代理人共同创建的调查工具。数据收集分两个阶段,遵循道德批准的协议,以保护隐私和支持数据有效性。结果:实践社区模型成功地整合了跨部门的专业知识,提高了研究工具的上下文相关性,并在高灵敏度的临床环境中实现了实时、上下文敏感的数据收集。该方法支持上下文感知适应,而传统的自上而下的研究方法不会出现上下文感知适应,有效地连接了学术研究和实际临床应用。结论:实践社区模型为研究复杂的医疗环境提供了一种可复制的跨学科方法。它在姑息治疗部门的案例研究表明,它有能力产生与以患者为中心的结果相一致的可操作的见解。随着卫生架构与循证医疗服务日益交叉,这种方法学方法对于使设计决策与临床和以人为中心的目标保持一致至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Collaborative Communities-of-Practice Methodology for Environmental Design Research: A Case Study Application in Palliative Care.

Environmental design in palliative care settings receives increasing attention, yet methodologies for studying such environments often lack interdisciplinary integration. Traditional research designs may overlook the lived expertise of clinicians and designers. Objectives: This article describes a collaborative, cross-disciplinary communities-of-practice model developed as a methodological framework to enable effective environmental evaluation and design processes in healthcare settings. Its application is illustrated through a case study in a palliative care unit. Methods: A co-designed, multi-methods approach was developed by a team of clinicians, facility managers, and academic researchers. The methodology included a scoping review, site-specific environmental data logging (sound, temperature, lighting), and co-created survey tools for staff and patients or proxies. Data were collected over two phases, following ethically approved protocols to protect privacy and support data validity. Results: The communities-of-practice model successfully integrated cross-sector expertise, improved the contextual relevance of study instruments, and enabled real-time, context-sensitive data collection in a high-acuity clinical setting. The method supported context-aware adaptations that would not have emerged from conventional top-down research approaches, effectively bridging academic inquiry and practical clinical application. Conclusion: The communities-of-practice model offers a replicable, interdisciplinary method for researching complex healthcare environments. Its case study in a palliative care unit demonstrates its capacity to generate actionable insights aligned with patient-centred outcomes. As health architecture increasingly intersects with evidence-based care delivery, such methodological approaches are vital for aligning design decisions with clinical and human-centred goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信