坚持不懈:对初级保健诊所心脏健康改善计划的可持续性能力的考察。

IF 1.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-22 DOI:10.1097/JAC.0000000000000538
Larry R Hearld, Nathan W Carroll, Kimberly A Smith, Holly Resuehr, Sharon Parker, Elizabeth A Jackson, Andrea Cherrington
{"title":"坚持不懈:对初级保健诊所心脏健康改善计划的可持续性能力的考察。","authors":"Larry R Hearld, Nathan W Carroll, Kimberly A Smith, Holly Resuehr, Sharon Parker, Elizabeth A Jackson, Andrea Cherrington","doi":"10.1097/JAC.0000000000000538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sustaining evidence-based interventions in health care delivery organizations are a well-known challenge. Failure to sustain evidence-based interventions wastes resources, diminishes access to high-quality care for patients and negatively affects quality outcomes, and leaves a residue of disillusionment among organizational members that hinder future efforts to implement other evidence-based interventions. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with sustainability capacity in a group of primary care clinics implementing the evidence-based heart health improvement program (HHIP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used mixed methods that included validated cross-sectional surveys and semi-structured interviews administered throughout 2023-2024 among 23 primary care clinics. Univariate and ordinary least squares regression models were used to describe the level of capacity across seven different dimensions of sustainability and their relationship with organizational characteristics. Quantitative relationships were considered statistically significant at P ≤ .05. A framework-guided analysis was applied to 6 interviews with clinic leaders and staff to identify thematic barriers to sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants reported relatively high levels of capacity to sustain the HHIP (range of 5.46-6.00, on a scale of 1-7), with the outcomes and effectiveness dimension rated highest and engaged staff rated lowest. The baseline level of organizational readiness to implement change was most consistently and positively related to sustainability capacity (5 of 7 dimensions). FQHCs (relative to non-FQHCs) and clinic leaders (relative to clinicians and clinic staff) were associated with higher ratings of 3 operationally focused dimensions of sustainability capacity (implementation and training, monitoring and evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite generally positive perceptions of clinic capacity to sustain the HHIP, our analysis highlights general opportunities to build capacity to sustain evidence-based practices in primary care settings (cultivate readiness to change among clinic members) and places where focused efforts may do the same (target organizational-cultural dimensions of sustainability capacity, non-FQHCs).</p>","PeriodicalId":46654,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","volume":"48 4","pages":"201-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keep On Keeping On: An Examination of the Sustainability Capacity of a Heart Health Improvement Program in Primary Care Clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Larry R Hearld, Nathan W Carroll, Kimberly A Smith, Holly Resuehr, Sharon Parker, Elizabeth A Jackson, Andrea Cherrington\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JAC.0000000000000538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sustaining evidence-based interventions in health care delivery organizations are a well-known challenge. Failure to sustain evidence-based interventions wastes resources, diminishes access to high-quality care for patients and negatively affects quality outcomes, and leaves a residue of disillusionment among organizational members that hinder future efforts to implement other evidence-based interventions. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with sustainability capacity in a group of primary care clinics implementing the evidence-based heart health improvement program (HHIP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used mixed methods that included validated cross-sectional surveys and semi-structured interviews administered throughout 2023-2024 among 23 primary care clinics. Univariate and ordinary least squares regression models were used to describe the level of capacity across seven different dimensions of sustainability and their relationship with organizational characteristics. Quantitative relationships were considered statistically significant at P ≤ .05. A framework-guided analysis was applied to 6 interviews with clinic leaders and staff to identify thematic barriers to sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants reported relatively high levels of capacity to sustain the HHIP (range of 5.46-6.00, on a scale of 1-7), with the outcomes and effectiveness dimension rated highest and engaged staff rated lowest. The baseline level of organizational readiness to implement change was most consistently and positively related to sustainability capacity (5 of 7 dimensions). FQHCs (relative to non-FQHCs) and clinic leaders (relative to clinicians and clinic staff) were associated with higher ratings of 3 operationally focused dimensions of sustainability capacity (implementation and training, monitoring and evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite generally positive perceptions of clinic capacity to sustain the HHIP, our analysis highlights general opportunities to build capacity to sustain evidence-based practices in primary care settings (cultivate readiness to change among clinic members) and places where focused efforts may do the same (target organizational-cultural dimensions of sustainability capacity, non-FQHCs).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"201-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在卫生保健服务组织中维持循证干预是一个众所周知的挑战。未能维持以证据为基础的干预措施会浪费资源,减少患者获得高质量护理的机会,并对质量结果产生负面影响,并在组织成员中留下幻想破灭的残余,从而阻碍未来实施其他以证据为基础的干预措施的努力。本研究的目的是在一组实施循证心脏健康改善计划(HHIP)的初级保健诊所中确定与可持续性能力相关的特征。方法:我们采用混合方法,包括在2023-2024年间对23家初级保健诊所进行的有效横断面调查和半结构化访谈。采用单变量回归模型和普通最小二乘回归模型描述了可持续发展七个不同维度的能力水平及其与组织特征的关系。P≤0.05认为数量关系有统计学意义。对6位诊所领导和工作人员进行了框架指导分析,以确定可持续发展的主题障碍。结果:研究参与者报告了相对较高的维持hip的能力水平(范围为5.46-6.00,范围为1-7),结果和有效性维度得分最高,敬业员工得分最低。组织准备实施变革的基线水平与可持续性能力(7个维度中的5个)最为一致和正相关。fqhc(相对于非fqhc)和临床领导者(相对于临床医生和临床工作人员)在可持续性能力的3个运营重点维度(实施和培训、监测和评估、结果和有效性)上的评分较高。结论:尽管人们普遍认为诊所有能力维持HHIP,但我们的分析强调了在初级保健环境中建立维持循证实践的能力的一般机会(培养诊所成员对改变的准备)和集中努力可能做同样事情的地方(可持续能力的目标组织文化维度,非fqhc)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keep On Keeping On: An Examination of the Sustainability Capacity of a Heart Health Improvement Program in Primary Care Clinics.

Objective: Sustaining evidence-based interventions in health care delivery organizations are a well-known challenge. Failure to sustain evidence-based interventions wastes resources, diminishes access to high-quality care for patients and negatively affects quality outcomes, and leaves a residue of disillusionment among organizational members that hinder future efforts to implement other evidence-based interventions. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with sustainability capacity in a group of primary care clinics implementing the evidence-based heart health improvement program (HHIP).

Methods: We used mixed methods that included validated cross-sectional surveys and semi-structured interviews administered throughout 2023-2024 among 23 primary care clinics. Univariate and ordinary least squares regression models were used to describe the level of capacity across seven different dimensions of sustainability and their relationship with organizational characteristics. Quantitative relationships were considered statistically significant at P ≤ .05. A framework-guided analysis was applied to 6 interviews with clinic leaders and staff to identify thematic barriers to sustainability.

Results: Study participants reported relatively high levels of capacity to sustain the HHIP (range of 5.46-6.00, on a scale of 1-7), with the outcomes and effectiveness dimension rated highest and engaged staff rated lowest. The baseline level of organizational readiness to implement change was most consistently and positively related to sustainability capacity (5 of 7 dimensions). FQHCs (relative to non-FQHCs) and clinic leaders (relative to clinicians and clinic staff) were associated with higher ratings of 3 operationally focused dimensions of sustainability capacity (implementation and training, monitoring and evaluation, and outcomes and effectiveness).

Conclusions: Despite generally positive perceptions of clinic capacity to sustain the HHIP, our analysis highlights general opportunities to build capacity to sustain evidence-based practices in primary care settings (cultivate readiness to change among clinic members) and places where focused efforts may do the same (target organizational-cultural dimensions of sustainability capacity, non-FQHCs).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management is a PEER-REVIEWED journal that provides timely, applied information on the most important developments and issues in ambulatory care management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信