评估增强现实头戴式设备在医疗保健:硬件,软件和可用性方法的回顾。

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S541187
Peiming Zhang, Zihe Wang, Tao Wang, Tielong Liu, Jing Wang, Yimeng Gao, Weiqi Li
{"title":"评估增强现实头戴式设备在医疗保健:硬件,软件和可用性方法的回顾。","authors":"Peiming Zhang, Zihe Wang, Tao Wang, Tielong Liu, Jing Wang, Yimeng Gao, Weiqi Li","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S541187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Augmented reality head-mounted devices (AR HMDs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare. Given the stringent safety and efficacy requirements of medical settings, proactive quantitative testing of key performance attributes prior to deployment is critical for risk assessment. A systematic performance evaluation framework is essential not only to support clinical adoption but also to secure regulatory approval. This review systematically summarizes hardware, software, and usability assessment methods for AR HMDs in healthcare, analyzes current research and experimental designs, and identifies challenges arising from device heterogeneity, limited coupling with real-world clinical scenarios, and subjective bias. To address these issues, we propose five design principles to guide the development of objective and practical evaluation methods: (1) identify key components based on core functions; (2) prioritize testing by functional contribution; (3) replicate authentic clinical and human-visual conditions; (4) objectify subjective perception; (5) test functionally linked components jointly.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"427-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Devices in Healthcare: A Review of Hardware, Software, and Usability Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Peiming Zhang, Zihe Wang, Tao Wang, Tielong Liu, Jing Wang, Yimeng Gao, Weiqi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S541187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Augmented reality head-mounted devices (AR HMDs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare. Given the stringent safety and efficacy requirements of medical settings, proactive quantitative testing of key performance attributes prior to deployment is critical for risk assessment. A systematic performance evaluation framework is essential not only to support clinical adoption but also to secure regulatory approval. This review systematically summarizes hardware, software, and usability assessment methods for AR HMDs in healthcare, analyzes current research and experimental designs, and identifies challenges arising from device heterogeneity, limited coupling with real-world clinical scenarios, and subjective bias. To address these issues, we propose five design principles to guide the development of objective and practical evaluation methods: (1) identify key components based on core functions; (2) prioritize testing by functional contribution; (3) replicate authentic clinical and human-visual conditions; (4) objectify subjective perception; (5) test functionally linked components jointly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"427-445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S541187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S541187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增强现实头戴式设备(AR hmd)越来越多地部署在医疗保健领域。鉴于医疗环境对安全性和有效性的严格要求,在部署前对关键性能属性进行主动定量测试对于风险评估至关重要。一个系统的绩效评估框架不仅对支持临床采用,而且对确保监管部门的批准至关重要。本文系统总结了AR头显在医疗保健领域的硬件、软件和可用性评估方法,分析了当前的研究和实验设计,并确定了设备异质性、与真实临床场景的有限耦合以及主观偏见所带来的挑战。针对这些问题,我们提出了五个设计原则,以指导客观实用的评估方法的发展:(1)基于核心功能确定关键组件;(2)根据功能贡献对测试进行优先排序;(3)复制真实的临床和人类视觉条件;(4)客观化主观感知;(5)共同测试功能链接部件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Devices in Healthcare: A Review of Hardware, Software, and Usability Approaches.

Evaluating Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Devices in Healthcare: A Review of Hardware, Software, and Usability Approaches.

Evaluating Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Devices in Healthcare: A Review of Hardware, Software, and Usability Approaches.

Evaluating Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Devices in Healthcare: A Review of Hardware, Software, and Usability Approaches.

Augmented reality head-mounted devices (AR HMDs) are increasingly deployed in healthcare. Given the stringent safety and efficacy requirements of medical settings, proactive quantitative testing of key performance attributes prior to deployment is critical for risk assessment. A systematic performance evaluation framework is essential not only to support clinical adoption but also to secure regulatory approval. This review systematically summarizes hardware, software, and usability assessment methods for AR HMDs in healthcare, analyzes current research and experimental designs, and identifies challenges arising from device heterogeneity, limited coupling with real-world clinical scenarios, and subjective bias. To address these issues, we propose five design principles to guide the development of objective and practical evaluation methods: (1) identify key components based on core functions; (2) prioritize testing by functional contribution; (3) replicate authentic clinical and human-visual conditions; (4) objectify subjective perception; (5) test functionally linked components jointly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信