数字乳房x线照相术中图像数目对带金盘幻像阈值图像对比度测量的影响。

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Michał Biegała, Agata Batolik
{"title":"数字乳房x线照相术中图像数目对带金盘幻像阈值图像对比度测量的影响。","authors":"Michał Biegała, Agata Batolik","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00958-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Image quality, in addition to radiation dose, is the most important physical parameter in digital mammography. Image quality should be periodically monitored using the CDMAM phantom. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the number of analyzed images on the result of threshold image contrast measurements using the CDMAM phantom in different versions. The images obtained using two versions of the CDMAM phantom, i.e., 3.4 and 4.0, were analyzed. The image analysis was performed and repeated 10 times for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 32 images from a pool of 43 images, separately for each phantom. For the CDMAM 3.4 phantom, a statistical difference was demonstrated between the following groups: S2 vs S6 (p < 0.006), S6 vs S16 (p < 0.001), S6 vs S24 (p < 0.002), S6 vs S32 (p < 0.021), S8 vs S16 (p < 0.019), S8 vs S24 (p < 0.048). For the CDMAM 4.0 phantom, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated between all groups and the N2 group (p < 0.000). For the CDMAM 3.4 phantom, the most favorable number of images required for analysis cannot be clearly determined. For the CDMAM 4.0 phantom, it is recommended to perform 24 images for analysis. Particular attention should be paid when determining the threshold image contrast for a disk diameter of 0.1 mm, as this parameter is used during exposure automation control.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the number of images on threshold image contrast measurements with a phantom with gold disks in digital mammography.\",\"authors\":\"Michał Biegała, Agata Batolik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12194-025-00958-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Image quality, in addition to radiation dose, is the most important physical parameter in digital mammography. Image quality should be periodically monitored using the CDMAM phantom. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the number of analyzed images on the result of threshold image contrast measurements using the CDMAM phantom in different versions. The images obtained using two versions of the CDMAM phantom, i.e., 3.4 and 4.0, were analyzed. The image analysis was performed and repeated 10 times for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 32 images from a pool of 43 images, separately for each phantom. For the CDMAM 3.4 phantom, a statistical difference was demonstrated between the following groups: S2 vs S6 (p < 0.006), S6 vs S16 (p < 0.001), S6 vs S24 (p < 0.002), S6 vs S32 (p < 0.021), S8 vs S16 (p < 0.019), S8 vs S24 (p < 0.048). For the CDMAM 4.0 phantom, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated between all groups and the N2 group (p < 0.000). For the CDMAM 3.4 phantom, the most favorable number of images required for analysis cannot be clearly determined. For the CDMAM 4.0 phantom, it is recommended to perform 24 images for analysis. Particular attention should be paid when determining the threshold image contrast for a disk diameter of 0.1 mm, as this parameter is used during exposure automation control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00958-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00958-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除辐射剂量外,图像质量是数字乳房x线摄影中最重要的物理参数。图像质量应使用CDMAM幻像定期监测。本研究的目的是探讨分析图像的数量对阈值图像对比度测量结果的影响,使用不同版本的CDMAM模型。对使用两个版本的CDMAM幻影(即3.4和4.0)获得的图像进行分析。对43张图像中的2、4、6、8、12、16、24和32张图像分别进行图像分析并重复10次。对于CDMAM 3.4幻像,以下组之间存在统计学差异:S2组与S6组(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of the number of images on threshold image contrast measurements with a phantom with gold disks in digital mammography.

Image quality, in addition to radiation dose, is the most important physical parameter in digital mammography. Image quality should be periodically monitored using the CDMAM phantom. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the number of analyzed images on the result of threshold image contrast measurements using the CDMAM phantom in different versions. The images obtained using two versions of the CDMAM phantom, i.e., 3.4 and 4.0, were analyzed. The image analysis was performed and repeated 10 times for 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 32 images from a pool of 43 images, separately for each phantom. For the CDMAM 3.4 phantom, a statistical difference was demonstrated between the following groups: S2 vs S6 (p < 0.006), S6 vs S16 (p < 0.001), S6 vs S24 (p < 0.002), S6 vs S32 (p < 0.021), S8 vs S16 (p < 0.019), S8 vs S24 (p < 0.048). For the CDMAM 4.0 phantom, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated between all groups and the N2 group (p < 0.000). For the CDMAM 3.4 phantom, the most favorable number of images required for analysis cannot be clearly determined. For the CDMAM 4.0 phantom, it is recommended to perform 24 images for analysis. Particular attention should be paid when determining the threshold image contrast for a disk diameter of 0.1 mm, as this parameter is used during exposure automation control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信