专家意见与消费者代表的兴起。

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01
Kavisha Shah
{"title":"专家意见与消费者代表的兴起。","authors":"Kavisha Shah","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer expertise is increasingly being leveraged in health service improvement to enhance patient satisfaction and experiences of care given the disparities in consumer and clinical prioritisation of health outcomes and treatment preferences. The value of experiential expertise is slowly being discovered in legal disputes with the involvement of consumers in health complaint investigations, but consumer perspectives remain underutilised in findings of law. This article explores whether expert opinion evidence could be tendered by consumer representatives in medical litigation and whether it should be recognised to minimise perceived (or actual) injustice against patients and their carers maligned as lay people in the judicial system. This theoretical exercise concludes that experiential expertise could qualify as expert opinion evidence, and this recognition would afford greater credibility to judicial decisions in line with recognised principles of procedural fairness.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"32 2","pages":"374-381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Opinion and the Rise of Consumer Representatives.\",\"authors\":\"Kavisha Shah\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Consumer expertise is increasingly being leveraged in health service improvement to enhance patient satisfaction and experiences of care given the disparities in consumer and clinical prioritisation of health outcomes and treatment preferences. The value of experiential expertise is slowly being discovered in legal disputes with the involvement of consumers in health complaint investigations, but consumer perspectives remain underutilised in findings of law. This article explores whether expert opinion evidence could be tendered by consumer representatives in medical litigation and whether it should be recognised to minimise perceived (or actual) injustice against patients and their carers maligned as lay people in the judicial system. This theoretical exercise concludes that experiential expertise could qualify as expert opinion evidence, and this recognition would afford greater credibility to judicial decisions in line with recognised principles of procedural fairness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"374-381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于消费者和临床对健康结果和治疗偏好的优先次序存在差异,在改善卫生服务方面越来越多地利用消费者的专业知识,以提高患者的满意度和护理体验。随着消费者参与健康投诉调查,在法律纠纷中逐渐发现了经验专门知识的价值,但消费者的观点在法律调查结果中仍未得到充分利用。本文探讨了在医疗诉讼中是否可以由消费者代表提供专家意见证据,以及是否应该承认专家意见证据,以最大限度地减少对患者及其护理人员的感知(或实际)不公正,因为他们在司法系统中被诬蔑为非专业人士。这一理论练习的结论是,经验专门知识可以作为专家意见证据,这种承认将使司法决定具有更大的可信度,符合公认的程序公平原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Opinion and the Rise of Consumer Representatives.

Consumer expertise is increasingly being leveraged in health service improvement to enhance patient satisfaction and experiences of care given the disparities in consumer and clinical prioritisation of health outcomes and treatment preferences. The value of experiential expertise is slowly being discovered in legal disputes with the involvement of consumers in health complaint investigations, but consumer perspectives remain underutilised in findings of law. This article explores whether expert opinion evidence could be tendered by consumer representatives in medical litigation and whether it should be recognised to minimise perceived (or actual) injustice against patients and their carers maligned as lay people in the judicial system. This theoretical exercise concludes that experiential expertise could qualify as expert opinion evidence, and this recognition would afford greater credibility to judicial decisions in line with recognised principles of procedural fairness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信