Alyssa N Van Denburg, Laura S Porter, Tamara J Somers, Francis J Keefe, Christine Rini
{"title":"干预任务的重要其他支持和阻碍:对改善健康和福祉的干预的影响。","authors":"Alyssa N Van Denburg, Laura S Porter, Tamara J Somers, Francis J Keefe, Christine Rini","doi":"10.1037/cfp0000271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain coping skills training (PCST) is the predominant behavioral intervention for chronic pain. Benefiting from PCST necessitates that individuals not only complete the training sessions but also integrate the new skills into their daily lives. However, the extent to which the social context influences the ability to use and benefit from this training is not yet fully understood. This study assessed social support and hindrance from significant others in individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) and associated pain (<i>N</i> = 55). Participants completed an 8-session, internet-based PCST program as part of a randomized controlled trial using a measure developed for this study of social support and hindrance for intervention tasks. Our findings revealed that participants expected more support than they received (<i>p</i> < .001) and that lower pre-intervention expectations of hindrance correlated with less hindrance received (<i>p</i> = .047). Hierarchical regression models showed that expected and received support and hindrance were not associated with regular skill use, although having a college education or higher was associated with this outcome (<i>β</i> = .50, <i>p</i> = .001). Expected and received support and hindrance did not account for a significant proportion of the variation in changes in pain intensity or pain-related interference with functioning. In contrast, received support was associated with greater change in self-efficacy for pain management, controlling for other variables in the model (<i>β</i> = .40, <i>p</i> = .01), underscoring a unique role for received support in relation to improvements in confidence for managing OA pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significant Other Support and Hindrance for Intervention Tasks: Implications for Interventions to Improve Health and Well-Being.\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa N Van Denburg, Laura S Porter, Tamara J Somers, Francis J Keefe, Christine Rini\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cfp0000271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pain coping skills training (PCST) is the predominant behavioral intervention for chronic pain. Benefiting from PCST necessitates that individuals not only complete the training sessions but also integrate the new skills into their daily lives. However, the extent to which the social context influences the ability to use and benefit from this training is not yet fully understood. This study assessed social support and hindrance from significant others in individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) and associated pain (<i>N</i> = 55). Participants completed an 8-session, internet-based PCST program as part of a randomized controlled trial using a measure developed for this study of social support and hindrance for intervention tasks. Our findings revealed that participants expected more support than they received (<i>p</i> < .001) and that lower pre-intervention expectations of hindrance correlated with less hindrance received (<i>p</i> = .047). Hierarchical regression models showed that expected and received support and hindrance were not associated with regular skill use, although having a college education or higher was associated with this outcome (<i>β</i> = .50, <i>p</i> = .001). Expected and received support and hindrance did not account for a significant proportion of the variation in changes in pain intensity or pain-related interference with functioning. In contrast, received support was associated with greater change in self-efficacy for pain management, controlling for other variables in the model (<i>β</i> = .40, <i>p</i> = .01), underscoring a unique role for received support in relation to improvements in confidence for managing OA pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
疼痛应对技能训练(PCST)是治疗慢性疼痛的主要行为干预手段。从PCST中受益,个人不仅需要完成培训课程,还需要将新技能融入日常生活。然而,社会环境在多大程度上影响使用这种培训的能力并从中受益,目前尚未完全了解。本研究评估了髋关节或膝关节骨关节炎(OA)及相关疼痛患者的社会支持和来自重要他人的阻碍(N = 55)。作为随机对照试验的一部分,参与者完成了一个8期的基于互联网的PCST项目,该项目使用了为本研究开发的社会支持和干预任务障碍的测量方法。我们的研究结果显示,参与者期望得到更多的支持(p < 0.001),干预前对障碍的期望越低,受到的障碍越少(p = 0.047)。层次回归模型显示,期望和获得的支持和障碍与常规技能使用无关,尽管具有大学或更高的教育程度与此结果相关(β = 0.50, p = .001)。预期的和得到的支持和阻碍并不能解释疼痛强度变化或疼痛相关功能干扰的显著比例。相比之下,在控制模型中的其他变量(β = 0.40, p = 0.01)的情况下,接受的支持与疼痛管理自我效能感的更大变化相关(β = 0.40, p = 0.01),强调了接受的支持在改善OA疼痛管理信心方面的独特作用。
Significant Other Support and Hindrance for Intervention Tasks: Implications for Interventions to Improve Health and Well-Being.
Pain coping skills training (PCST) is the predominant behavioral intervention for chronic pain. Benefiting from PCST necessitates that individuals not only complete the training sessions but also integrate the new skills into their daily lives. However, the extent to which the social context influences the ability to use and benefit from this training is not yet fully understood. This study assessed social support and hindrance from significant others in individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA) and associated pain (N = 55). Participants completed an 8-session, internet-based PCST program as part of a randomized controlled trial using a measure developed for this study of social support and hindrance for intervention tasks. Our findings revealed that participants expected more support than they received (p < .001) and that lower pre-intervention expectations of hindrance correlated with less hindrance received (p = .047). Hierarchical regression models showed that expected and received support and hindrance were not associated with regular skill use, although having a college education or higher was associated with this outcome (β = .50, p = .001). Expected and received support and hindrance did not account for a significant proportion of the variation in changes in pain intensity or pain-related interference with functioning. In contrast, received support was associated with greater change in self-efficacy for pain management, controlling for other variables in the model (β = .40, p = .01), underscoring a unique role for received support in relation to improvements in confidence for managing OA pain.
期刊介绍:
Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice ® (CFP) is a scholarly journal publishing peer-reviewed papers representing the science and practice of family psychology. CFP is the official publication of APA Division 43 (Society for Couple and Family Psychology) and is intended to be a forum for scholarly dialogue regarding the most important emerging issues in the field, a primary outlet for research particularly as it impacts practice and for papers regarding education, public policy, and the identity of the profession of family psychology. As the official journal for the Society, CFP will provide a home for the members of the division and those in other fields interested in the most cutting edge issues in family psychology. Unlike other journals in the field, CFP is focused specifically on family psychology as a specialty practice, unique scientific domain, and critical element of psychological knowledge. CFP will seek and publish scholarly manuscripts that make a contribution to the knowledge base of family psychology specifically, and the science and practice of working with individuals, couples and families from a family systems perspective in general.