屈肌腱修复的生物力学评价:双环技术与外延缝合。

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
A N Sadagatullah, S Raghu, M Paiman, S Ismail, M H Jusoh
{"title":"屈肌腱修复的生物力学评价:双环技术与外延缝合。","authors":"A N Sadagatullah, S Raghu, M Paiman, S Ismail, M H Jusoh","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2507.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are various methods used to repair lacerated tendons. The minimum requirement for the best results and lowest rupture rate is the four-strand repair technique. The cruciate type of repair is among the most popular methods available but is very technical and requires expertise. An easier two-double-loop method for tendon healing is suggested in this study. This study assessed the biomechanical properties of two well-known tendon repair techniques-the modified Kessler and cruciate approaches-and two lesser-known double-loop techniques for tensile strength, stiffness, and failure mode.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four adult chickens' Achilles tendons were randomly divided into three groups and sutured with a four-strand core suture using the four-strand modified Kessler technique, the four-strand cruciate technique, and the two-double-loop approach. Twenty-four more adult chicken Achilles tendons were acquired, and they were randomly assigned to the same three groups along with an extra running epitendinous repair. A synthetic, non-absorbable monofilament polypropylene suture was used for all repairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-strand modified Kessler, and the four-strand cruciate procedures had the lowest mean ultimate tensile strength, whereas the two double-loop techniques had the strongest. The results were dramatically impacted by using an epitendinous suture during test analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strongest and comparatively less technically complex technique used in this investigation was the two-double-loop, four-strand core suture method. The significance of the extra strength that the epitendinous suture gave was clear. Using this in a clinical setting is recommended for hand flexor tendon injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 2","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Evaluation of Flexor Tendon Repair: Double Loop Technique with Epitendinous Suture.\",\"authors\":\"A N Sadagatullah, S Raghu, M Paiman, S Ismail, M H Jusoh\",\"doi\":\"10.5704/MOJ.2507.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are various methods used to repair lacerated tendons. The minimum requirement for the best results and lowest rupture rate is the four-strand repair technique. The cruciate type of repair is among the most popular methods available but is very technical and requires expertise. An easier two-double-loop method for tendon healing is suggested in this study. This study assessed the biomechanical properties of two well-known tendon repair techniques-the modified Kessler and cruciate approaches-and two lesser-known double-loop techniques for tensile strength, stiffness, and failure mode.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four adult chickens' Achilles tendons were randomly divided into three groups and sutured with a four-strand core suture using the four-strand modified Kessler technique, the four-strand cruciate technique, and the two-double-loop approach. Twenty-four more adult chicken Achilles tendons were acquired, and they were randomly assigned to the same three groups along with an extra running epitendinous repair. A synthetic, non-absorbable monofilament polypropylene suture was used for all repairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-strand modified Kessler, and the four-strand cruciate procedures had the lowest mean ultimate tensile strength, whereas the two double-loop techniques had the strongest. The results were dramatically impacted by using an epitendinous suture during test analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strongest and comparatively less technically complex technique used in this investigation was the two-double-loop, four-strand core suture method. The significance of the extra strength that the epitendinous suture gave was clear. Using this in a clinical setting is recommended for hand flexor tendon injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368454/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2507.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2507.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有多种方法用于修复撕裂的肌腱。对最佳结果和最低断裂率的最低要求是四股修复技术。十字型修复是最流行的方法之一,但技术性很强,需要专业知识。本研究提出了一种更简单的双-双环肌腱愈合方法。本研究评估了两种众所周知的肌腱修复技术的生物力学特性-改良的Kessler和十字方法-以及两种鲜为人知的双环拉伸强度,刚度和失效模式技术。材料和方法:将24只成年鸡跟腱随机分为3组,采用四股改良Kessler技术、四股交叉技术和双双环入路四股核心缝合。另外获得24只成年鸡跟腱,并将它们随机分配到相同的三组,同时进行额外的外延修复。所有修复均使用合成的、不可吸收的单丝聚丙烯缝线。结果:四股改良的Kessler和四股交叉手术的平均极限拉伸强度最低,而两种双环技术的极限拉伸强度最强。在测试分析过程中,使用外延缝合对结果有显著影响。结论:在本研究中使用的最强且相对较少技术复杂的技术是双双环,四股核心缝合法。外延缝线给予的额外强度的意义是明确的。建议在临床上使用此方法治疗手部屈肌腱损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical Evaluation of Flexor Tendon Repair: Double Loop Technique with Epitendinous Suture.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Flexor Tendon Repair: Double Loop Technique with Epitendinous Suture.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Flexor Tendon Repair: Double Loop Technique with Epitendinous Suture.

Introduction: There are various methods used to repair lacerated tendons. The minimum requirement for the best results and lowest rupture rate is the four-strand repair technique. The cruciate type of repair is among the most popular methods available but is very technical and requires expertise. An easier two-double-loop method for tendon healing is suggested in this study. This study assessed the biomechanical properties of two well-known tendon repair techniques-the modified Kessler and cruciate approaches-and two lesser-known double-loop techniques for tensile strength, stiffness, and failure mode.

Materials and methods: Twenty-four adult chickens' Achilles tendons were randomly divided into three groups and sutured with a four-strand core suture using the four-strand modified Kessler technique, the four-strand cruciate technique, and the two-double-loop approach. Twenty-four more adult chicken Achilles tendons were acquired, and they were randomly assigned to the same three groups along with an extra running epitendinous repair. A synthetic, non-absorbable monofilament polypropylene suture was used for all repairs.

Results: The four-strand modified Kessler, and the four-strand cruciate procedures had the lowest mean ultimate tensile strength, whereas the two double-loop techniques had the strongest. The results were dramatically impacted by using an epitendinous suture during test analysis.

Conclusion: The strongest and comparatively less technically complex technique used in this investigation was the two-double-loop, four-strand core suture method. The significance of the extra strength that the epitendinous suture gave was clear. Using this in a clinical setting is recommended for hand flexor tendon injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信