Ramona Andreea Cioroianu, Michael Schenker, Virginia-Maria Rădulescu, Tradian Ciprian Berisha, George Ovidiu Cioroianu, Mihaela Popescu, Cristina Mihaela Ciofiac, Ana Maria Petrescu, Stelian Ștefăniță Mogoantă
{"title":"乳腺癌的治疗模式和手术决策:罗马尼亚的回顾性区域队列研究。","authors":"Ramona Andreea Cioroianu, Michael Schenker, Virginia-Maria Rădulescu, Tradian Ciprian Berisha, George Ovidiu Cioroianu, Mihaela Popescu, Cristina Mihaela Ciofiac, Ana Maria Petrescu, Stelian Ștefăniță Mogoantă","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15080145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women globally. In Romania, it is the most frequent form of cancer affecting women, with approximately 12,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality, second only to lung cancer. <b>Methods</b>: This study looked at 79 breast cancer patients from Oltenia, concentrating on epidemiology, histology, diagnostic features, and treatments. Patients were chosen based on inclusion criteria such as histopathologically verified diagnosis, availability of clinical and treatment data, and follow-up information. The analyzed biological material consisted of tissue samples taken from the breast parenchyma and axillary lymph nodes. Even though not the primary subject of this paper, all patients underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation both preoperatively and postoperatively. <b>Results</b>: We found invasive ductal carcinoma to be the predominant type, while ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mixed types were rare. We performed cross-tabulations of metastasis versus nodal status and age versus therapy type; none reached significance (all <i>p</i> > 0.05), suggesting observed differences were likely due to chance. A chi-square test comparing surgical interventions (breast-conserving vs. mastectomy) in patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy showed, χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.17, <i>p</i> = 0.367, indicating that chemotherapy did not significantly influence surgical choice. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were used at similar rates across age groups, whereas neoadjuvant hormonal (endocrine) therapy was more common in older patients (but without statistical significance). <b>Conclusions</b>: Finally, we discussed the consequences of individualized care and early detection. Romania's shockingly low screening rate, which contributes to delayed diagnosis, emphasizes the importance of improved population medical examination and tailored treatment options. Also, the country has one of the lowest rates of mammography uptake in Europe and no systematic population screening program.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Patterns and Surgical Decision-Making in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Regional Cohort Study in Romania.\",\"authors\":\"Ramona Andreea Cioroianu, Michael Schenker, Virginia-Maria Rădulescu, Tradian Ciprian Berisha, George Ovidiu Cioroianu, Mihaela Popescu, Cristina Mihaela Ciofiac, Ana Maria Petrescu, Stelian Ștefăniță Mogoantă\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract15080145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women globally. In Romania, it is the most frequent form of cancer affecting women, with approximately 12,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality, second only to lung cancer. <b>Methods</b>: This study looked at 79 breast cancer patients from Oltenia, concentrating on epidemiology, histology, diagnostic features, and treatments. Patients were chosen based on inclusion criteria such as histopathologically verified diagnosis, availability of clinical and treatment data, and follow-up information. The analyzed biological material consisted of tissue samples taken from the breast parenchyma and axillary lymph nodes. Even though not the primary subject of this paper, all patients underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation both preoperatively and postoperatively. <b>Results</b>: We found invasive ductal carcinoma to be the predominant type, while ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mixed types were rare. We performed cross-tabulations of metastasis versus nodal status and age versus therapy type; none reached significance (all <i>p</i> > 0.05), suggesting observed differences were likely due to chance. A chi-square test comparing surgical interventions (breast-conserving vs. mastectomy) in patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy showed, χ<sup>2</sup> = 3.17, <i>p</i> = 0.367, indicating that chemotherapy did not significantly influence surgical choice. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were used at similar rates across age groups, whereas neoadjuvant hormonal (endocrine) therapy was more common in older patients (but without statistical significance). <b>Conclusions</b>: Finally, we discussed the consequences of individualized care and early detection. Romania's shockingly low screening rate, which contributes to delayed diagnosis, emphasizes the importance of improved population medical examination and tailored treatment options. Also, the country has one of the lowest rates of mammography uptake in Europe and no systematic population screening program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12385030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:乳腺癌是全球女性中最常见的恶性肿瘤。在罗马尼亚,它是影响妇女的最常见的癌症形式,每年约有12 000个新诊断病例,是癌症相关死亡的第二大常见原因,仅次于肺癌。方法:本研究观察了79例来自Oltenia的乳腺癌患者,重点关注流行病学、组织学、诊断特征和治疗。患者的选择基于纳入标准,如经组织病理学证实的诊断、临床和治疗数据的可用性以及随访信息。所分析的生物材料包括取自乳腺实质和腋窝淋巴结的组织样本。尽管不是本文的主要研究对象,但所有患者术前和术后均进行了免疫组化(IHC)评估。结果:浸润性导管癌为主要类型,导管原位癌(DCIS)及混合型少见。我们进行了转移与淋巴结状态、年龄与治疗类型的交叉表;没有达到显著性(均p < 0.05),表明观察到的差异可能是偶然的。卡方检验比较接受化疗或未接受化疗的患者的手术干预(保乳与乳房切除术),χ2 = 3.17, p = 0.367,表明化疗对手术选择没有显著影响。重要的是,各个年龄组的辅助化疗和放疗的使用率相似,而新辅助激素(内分泌)治疗在老年患者中更常见(但没有统计学意义)。结论:最后,我们讨论了个体化护理和早期发现的后果。罗马尼亚的筛查率低得惊人,导致诊断延误,这强调了改进人口医疗检查和量身定制治疗方案的重要性。此外,该国是欧洲乳房x光检查使用率最低的国家之一,而且没有系统的人口筛查计划。
Therapeutic Patterns and Surgical Decision-Making in Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Regional Cohort Study in Romania.
Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women globally. In Romania, it is the most frequent form of cancer affecting women, with approximately 12,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality, second only to lung cancer. Methods: This study looked at 79 breast cancer patients from Oltenia, concentrating on epidemiology, histology, diagnostic features, and treatments. Patients were chosen based on inclusion criteria such as histopathologically verified diagnosis, availability of clinical and treatment data, and follow-up information. The analyzed biological material consisted of tissue samples taken from the breast parenchyma and axillary lymph nodes. Even though not the primary subject of this paper, all patients underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation both preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: We found invasive ductal carcinoma to be the predominant type, while ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mixed types were rare. We performed cross-tabulations of metastasis versus nodal status and age versus therapy type; none reached significance (all p > 0.05), suggesting observed differences were likely due to chance. A chi-square test comparing surgical interventions (breast-conserving vs. mastectomy) in patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy showed, χ2 = 3.17, p = 0.367, indicating that chemotherapy did not significantly influence surgical choice. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were used at similar rates across age groups, whereas neoadjuvant hormonal (endocrine) therapy was more common in older patients (but without statistical significance). Conclusions: Finally, we discussed the consequences of individualized care and early detection. Romania's shockingly low screening rate, which contributes to delayed diagnosis, emphasizes the importance of improved population medical examination and tailored treatment options. Also, the country has one of the lowest rates of mammography uptake in Europe and no systematic population screening program.