{"title":"在评估预后生物标志物的鉴别准确性时考虑竞争风险。","authors":"Xinran Huang, Xinyang Jiang, Ruosha Li, Jing Ning","doi":"10.1007/s12561-025-09499-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discriminative performance of biomarkers often changes over time and exhibits heterogeneity across subgroups defined by patient characteristics. Assessing how this performance varies with these factors is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of biomarkers and to identify areas for improvement in sub-populations with poor performance. Additionally, the presence of competing risks complicates the assessment of discriminative performance. Ignoring competing risks can lead to misleading conclusions, as the biomarker's performance for the event of interest, such as disease onset, may be confounded by its performance for competing events, such as death. To address these challenges, we develop a regression model to assess the impact of covariates on the discriminative performance of biomarkers, characterized by the covariate-specific time-dependent Area-undercurve (AUC) for a specific cause. We construct a pseudo partial-likelihood for estimation and inference and establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the finite sample performance of these estimators, and we apply the proposed method to data from the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK).</p>","PeriodicalId":45094,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Biosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting for Competing Risks in the Assessment of Prognostic Biomarkers' Discriminative Accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Xinran Huang, Xinyang Jiang, Ruosha Li, Jing Ning\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12561-025-09499-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The discriminative performance of biomarkers often changes over time and exhibits heterogeneity across subgroups defined by patient characteristics. Assessing how this performance varies with these factors is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of biomarkers and to identify areas for improvement in sub-populations with poor performance. Additionally, the presence of competing risks complicates the assessment of discriminative performance. Ignoring competing risks can lead to misleading conclusions, as the biomarker's performance for the event of interest, such as disease onset, may be confounded by its performance for competing events, such as death. To address these challenges, we develop a regression model to assess the impact of covariates on the discriminative performance of biomarkers, characterized by the covariate-specific time-dependent Area-undercurve (AUC) for a specific cause. We construct a pseudo partial-likelihood for estimation and inference and establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the finite sample performance of these estimators, and we apply the proposed method to data from the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Biosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366773/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-025-09499-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12561-025-09499-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accounting for Competing Risks in the Assessment of Prognostic Biomarkers' Discriminative Accuracy.
The discriminative performance of biomarkers often changes over time and exhibits heterogeneity across subgroups defined by patient characteristics. Assessing how this performance varies with these factors is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of biomarkers and to identify areas for improvement in sub-populations with poor performance. Additionally, the presence of competing risks complicates the assessment of discriminative performance. Ignoring competing risks can lead to misleading conclusions, as the biomarker's performance for the event of interest, such as disease onset, may be confounded by its performance for competing events, such as death. To address these challenges, we develop a regression model to assess the impact of covariates on the discriminative performance of biomarkers, characterized by the covariate-specific time-dependent Area-undercurve (AUC) for a specific cause. We construct a pseudo partial-likelihood for estimation and inference and establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the finite sample performance of these estimators, and we apply the proposed method to data from the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK).
期刊介绍:
Statistics in Biosciences (SIBS) is published three times a year in print and electronic form. It aims at development and application of statistical methods and their interface with other quantitative methods, such as computational and mathematical methods, in biological and life science, health science, and biopharmaceutical and biotechnological science.
SIBS publishes scientific papers and review articles in four sections, with the first two sections as the primary sections. Original Articles publish novel statistical and quantitative methods in biosciences. The Bioscience Case Studies and Practice Articles publish papers that advance statistical practice in biosciences, such as case studies, innovative applications of existing methods that further understanding of subject-matter science, evaluation of existing methods and data sources. Review Articles publish papers that review an area of statistical and quantitative methodology, software, and data sources in biosciences. Commentaries provide perspectives of research topics or policy issues that are of current quantitative interest in biosciences, reactions to an article published in the journal, and scholarly essays. Substantive science is essential in motivating and demonstrating the methodological development and use for an article to be acceptable. Articles published in SIBS share the goal of promoting evidence-based real world practice and policy making through effective and timely interaction and communication of statisticians and quantitative researchers with subject-matter scientists in biosciences.