一般家庭医学对悲伤家庭的随访:家庭医生的做法和态度的横断面研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Fábio Leite Costa, Miguel Barbosa
{"title":"一般家庭医学对悲伤家庭的随访:家庭医生的做法和态度的横断面研究。","authors":"Fábio Leite Costa, Miguel Barbosa","doi":"10.1136/fmch-2025-003296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family physicians (FPs) provide essential support during life's most challenging moments, including experiences of grief and loss. After a patient's death, FPs are expected to provide information and emotional support to bereaved family members. Prior research suggests that bereaved relatives expect follow-up contact from their FP, acknowledging it as part of the physician's role. This study aims to explore the practices and attitudes of FPs towards bereaved family members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted through an online questionnaire, exploring participants' perceived role in bereavement care, the type of support offered to families, available resources in primary care, as well as personal knowledge and approach on grief. This questionnaire was distributed via digital platforms to general and family medicine doctors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 physicians participated (84.3% female; 53.8% in residency), with a median age of 32 years old. On average, each FP experienced five patient deaths, most often reported by family members. More than half (53.3%) contacted bereaved families in fewer than 25% of cases, typically within 7 days of the death, most commonly by phone (76.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant gaps in the bereavement follow-up practices of FPs in Portugal. Findings emphasise the need for integrated bereavement care guidelines in primary care, institutional policies and investment in targeted training programmes to enhance grief's approach. The reported lack of grief training reinforces the need to integrate grief education into medical curriculum and continuous professional development. Structural improvements, such as the implementation of automatic death notifications within the healthcare system, are also critical for enabling timely and effective support.</p>","PeriodicalId":44590,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Community Health","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow-up of grieving families in general and family medicine: a cross-sectional study on the practices and attitudes of family doctors.\",\"authors\":\"Fábio Leite Costa, Miguel Barbosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/fmch-2025-003296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family physicians (FPs) provide essential support during life's most challenging moments, including experiences of grief and loss. After a patient's death, FPs are expected to provide information and emotional support to bereaved family members. Prior research suggests that bereaved relatives expect follow-up contact from their FP, acknowledging it as part of the physician's role. This study aims to explore the practices and attitudes of FPs towards bereaved family members.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted through an online questionnaire, exploring participants' perceived role in bereavement care, the type of support offered to families, available resources in primary care, as well as personal knowledge and approach on grief. This questionnaire was distributed via digital platforms to general and family medicine doctors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 physicians participated (84.3% female; 53.8% in residency), with a median age of 32 years old. On average, each FP experienced five patient deaths, most often reported by family members. More than half (53.3%) contacted bereaved families in fewer than 25% of cases, typically within 7 days of the death, most commonly by phone (76.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights significant gaps in the bereavement follow-up practices of FPs in Portugal. Findings emphasise the need for integrated bereavement care guidelines in primary care, institutional policies and investment in targeted training programmes to enhance grief's approach. The reported lack of grief training reinforces the need to integrate grief education into medical curriculum and continuous professional development. Structural improvements, such as the implementation of automatic death notifications within the healthcare system, are also critical for enabling timely and effective support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Medicine and Community Health\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410656/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Medicine and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003296\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2025-003296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:家庭医生(FPs)在生活中最具挑战性的时刻提供必要的支持,包括悲伤和失去的经历。病人死后,急救医生应向失去亲人的家庭成员提供信息和情感支持。先前的研究表明,失去亲人的家属希望他们的家庭医生继续联系,承认这是医生职责的一部分。本研究旨在探讨家庭主妇对待丧亲家属的做法和态度。方法:采用横断面、描述性的在线调查问卷,探讨被试在丧亲关怀中所扮演的角色、为家庭提供的支持类型、初级保健的可用资源以及个人对悲伤的认识和方法。该问卷通过数字平台分发给全科医生和家庭医生。结果:共有210名医生参与调查,其中女性84.3%,住院医师53.8%,中位年龄32岁。平均每个计划生育中心有5名病人死亡,大多数是由家庭成员报告的。在不到25%的病例中,半数以上(53.3%)的人通常在死亡后7天内与丧亲者家属联系,最常见的是通过电话(76.5%)。结论:本研究突出了葡萄牙FPs丧亲随访实践的显著差距。研究结果强调,需要在初级保健中制定综合的丧亲护理指导方针,制定制度政策,并投资于有针对性的培训计划,以加强对悲伤的处理。据报道,缺乏悲伤培训加强了将悲伤教育纳入医学课程和持续专业发展的必要性。结构改进,例如在医疗保健系统内实施自动死亡通知,对于实现及时和有效的支持也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Follow-up of grieving families in general and family medicine: a cross-sectional study on the practices and attitudes of family doctors.

Introduction: Family physicians (FPs) provide essential support during life's most challenging moments, including experiences of grief and loss. After a patient's death, FPs are expected to provide information and emotional support to bereaved family members. Prior research suggests that bereaved relatives expect follow-up contact from their FP, acknowledging it as part of the physician's role. This study aims to explore the practices and attitudes of FPs towards bereaved family members.

Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted through an online questionnaire, exploring participants' perceived role in bereavement care, the type of support offered to families, available resources in primary care, as well as personal knowledge and approach on grief. This questionnaire was distributed via digital platforms to general and family medicine doctors.

Results: A total of 210 physicians participated (84.3% female; 53.8% in residency), with a median age of 32 years old. On average, each FP experienced five patient deaths, most often reported by family members. More than half (53.3%) contacted bereaved families in fewer than 25% of cases, typically within 7 days of the death, most commonly by phone (76.5%).

Conclusion: This study highlights significant gaps in the bereavement follow-up practices of FPs in Portugal. Findings emphasise the need for integrated bereavement care guidelines in primary care, institutional policies and investment in targeted training programmes to enhance grief's approach. The reported lack of grief training reinforces the need to integrate grief education into medical curriculum and continuous professional development. Structural improvements, such as the implementation of automatic death notifications within the healthcare system, are also critical for enabling timely and effective support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine and Community Health (FMCH) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the topics of family medicine, general practice and community health. FMCH strives to be a leading international journal that promotes ‘Health Care for All’ through disseminating novel knowledge and best practices in primary care, family medicine, and community health. FMCH publishes original research, review, methodology, commentary, reflection, and case-study from the lens of population health. FMCH’s Asian Focus section features reports of family medicine development in the Asia-pacific region. FMCH aims to be an exemplary forum for the timely communication of medical knowledge and skills with the goal of promoting improved health care through the practice of family and community-based medicine globally. FMCH aims to serve a diverse audience including researchers, educators, policymakers and leaders of family medicine and community health. We also aim to provide content relevant for researchers working on population health, epidemiology, public policy, disease control and management, preventative medicine and disease burden. FMCH does not impose any article processing charges (APC) or submission charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信