Eric E Davis, Sueann Mark, Genevieve A Woodard, Felicia Tang, Matthew Gellatly, Jessica H Hayward, Kimberly M Ray, Bonnie N Joe, Amie Y Lee, Maggie Chung
{"title":"含有肾上腺素的利多卡因与图像引导核心针乳腺活检后血肿风险。","authors":"Eric E Davis, Sueann Mark, Genevieve A Woodard, Felicia Tang, Matthew Gellatly, Jessica H Hayward, Kimberly M Ray, Bonnie N Joe, Amie Y Lee, Maggie Chung","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the risk of symptomatic hematomas in patients receiving epinephrine-containing lidocaine compared with lidocaine alone after core-needle breast biopsies (CNBBs). The efficacy of epinephrine-containing lidocaine in reducing hematoma risk following image-guided CNBB remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-institution, retrospective review of all CNBBs performed during a 6-month period using lidocaine alone (September 1, 2022, to March 15, 2023) due to a national shortage of epinephrine-containing lidocaine and a 6-month period using epinephrine-containing lidocaine (April 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A nurse navigator contacted all patients postbiopsy to assess postprocedural complications, including symptomatic hematomas. Postprocedure mammograms were reviewed for detectable hematomas after 9-gauge and 12- to 14-gauge CNBBs. Logistic regression models evaluated the associations between epinephrine-containing lidocaine use and symptomatic and mammographically evident hematomas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1157 CNBBs were performed in 967 patients; 619 received epinephrine-containing lidocaine and 538 received lidocaine alone. There were 11 (1.0%; 11/1157) symptomatic hematomas, 10 of which occurred following 9-gauge CNBBs (6 with stereotactic/tomosynthesis guidance and 4 with MRI guidance). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of symptomatic hematomas (P = .34) or mammographically evident hematomas (P = .53) after 12- to 14-gauge US-guided CNBBs performed with epinephrine-containing lidocaine vs lidocaine alone. Fewer symptomatic hematomas occurred after 9-gauge CNBBs in the epinephrine-containing lidocaine group (0.6%; 2/310) compared with the lidocaine alone (4.1%; 8/194) (P = .02). After 9-gauge CNBBs, mammographically evident hematomas were less frequent (16.1% vs 41.2%; P <.0001) with epinephrine-containing lidocaine compared with lidocaine alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epinephrine-containing lidocaine reduced rates of symptomatic and mammographically detected hematomas after 9-gauge CNBBs. Local infiltration with epinephrine-containing lidocaine could be considered in 9-gauge CNBBs to reduce hematoma risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epinephrine-Containing Lidocaine and Hematoma Risk After Image-Guided Core-Needle Breast Biopsy.\",\"authors\":\"Eric E Davis, Sueann Mark, Genevieve A Woodard, Felicia Tang, Matthew Gellatly, Jessica H Hayward, Kimberly M Ray, Bonnie N Joe, Amie Y Lee, Maggie Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbi/wbaf026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the risk of symptomatic hematomas in patients receiving epinephrine-containing lidocaine compared with lidocaine alone after core-needle breast biopsies (CNBBs). The efficacy of epinephrine-containing lidocaine in reducing hematoma risk following image-guided CNBB remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-institution, retrospective review of all CNBBs performed during a 6-month period using lidocaine alone (September 1, 2022, to March 15, 2023) due to a national shortage of epinephrine-containing lidocaine and a 6-month period using epinephrine-containing lidocaine (April 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A nurse navigator contacted all patients postbiopsy to assess postprocedural complications, including symptomatic hematomas. Postprocedure mammograms were reviewed for detectable hematomas after 9-gauge and 12- to 14-gauge CNBBs. Logistic regression models evaluated the associations between epinephrine-containing lidocaine use and symptomatic and mammographically evident hematomas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1157 CNBBs were performed in 967 patients; 619 received epinephrine-containing lidocaine and 538 received lidocaine alone. There were 11 (1.0%; 11/1157) symptomatic hematomas, 10 of which occurred following 9-gauge CNBBs (6 with stereotactic/tomosynthesis guidance and 4 with MRI guidance). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of symptomatic hematomas (P = .34) or mammographically evident hematomas (P = .53) after 12- to 14-gauge US-guided CNBBs performed with epinephrine-containing lidocaine vs lidocaine alone. Fewer symptomatic hematomas occurred after 9-gauge CNBBs in the epinephrine-containing lidocaine group (0.6%; 2/310) compared with the lidocaine alone (4.1%; 8/194) (P = .02). After 9-gauge CNBBs, mammographically evident hematomas were less frequent (16.1% vs 41.2%; P <.0001) with epinephrine-containing lidocaine compared with lidocaine alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epinephrine-containing lidocaine reduced rates of symptomatic and mammographically detected hematomas after 9-gauge CNBBs. Local infiltration with epinephrine-containing lidocaine could be considered in 9-gauge CNBBs to reduce hematoma risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Epinephrine-Containing Lidocaine and Hematoma Risk After Image-Guided Core-Needle Breast Biopsy.
Objective: To evaluate the risk of symptomatic hematomas in patients receiving epinephrine-containing lidocaine compared with lidocaine alone after core-needle breast biopsies (CNBBs). The efficacy of epinephrine-containing lidocaine in reducing hematoma risk following image-guided CNBB remains unclear.
Methods: A single-institution, retrospective review of all CNBBs performed during a 6-month period using lidocaine alone (September 1, 2022, to March 15, 2023) due to a national shortage of epinephrine-containing lidocaine and a 6-month period using epinephrine-containing lidocaine (April 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A nurse navigator contacted all patients postbiopsy to assess postprocedural complications, including symptomatic hematomas. Postprocedure mammograms were reviewed for detectable hematomas after 9-gauge and 12- to 14-gauge CNBBs. Logistic regression models evaluated the associations between epinephrine-containing lidocaine use and symptomatic and mammographically evident hematomas.
Results: A total of 1157 CNBBs were performed in 967 patients; 619 received epinephrine-containing lidocaine and 538 received lidocaine alone. There were 11 (1.0%; 11/1157) symptomatic hematomas, 10 of which occurred following 9-gauge CNBBs (6 with stereotactic/tomosynthesis guidance and 4 with MRI guidance). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of symptomatic hematomas (P = .34) or mammographically evident hematomas (P = .53) after 12- to 14-gauge US-guided CNBBs performed with epinephrine-containing lidocaine vs lidocaine alone. Fewer symptomatic hematomas occurred after 9-gauge CNBBs in the epinephrine-containing lidocaine group (0.6%; 2/310) compared with the lidocaine alone (4.1%; 8/194) (P = .02). After 9-gauge CNBBs, mammographically evident hematomas were less frequent (16.1% vs 41.2%; P <.0001) with epinephrine-containing lidocaine compared with lidocaine alone.
Conclusion: Epinephrine-containing lidocaine reduced rates of symptomatic and mammographically detected hematomas after 9-gauge CNBBs. Local infiltration with epinephrine-containing lidocaine could be considered in 9-gauge CNBBs to reduce hematoma risk.