打破坚冰:乳房冷冻消融的在线患者教育材料可读且可理解吗?

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Simon Kidanemariam, Antonio R Lopez, Grayson L Baird, Robert C Ward, Joey Z Gu, John McMenamy, Randy C Miles
{"title":"打破坚冰:乳房冷冻消融的在线患者教育材料可读且可理解吗?","authors":"Simon Kidanemariam, Antonio R Lopez, Grayson L Baird, Robert C Ward, Joey Z Gu, John McMenamy, Randy C Miles","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Online patient education materials (OPEMs) provide valuable information on breast-related conditions and treatment options. We evaluated commonly accessed OPEMs related to breast cryoablation to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability metrics of educational materials available to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Google, the terms \"breast cryoablation,\" \"breast cryosurgery,\" and \"breast cryotherapy\" were queried. The top 50 websites providing OPEMs for the general public were identified by search ranking. A virtual private network was used, and location tracking, cookies, and user account information were disabled before querying. Sponsored content and research journal articles were excluded. Websites were categorized as academic/hospital, commercial, or nonprofit based on the hosting organization. Online patient education materials from the top 50 sites were downloaded and assessed for readability, understandability, and actionability. Mixed modeling, with sources nested within readability scores (automated readability, Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook), was used to evaluate these metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52 websites, the overall mean grade-level readability was 12.3 (95% CI, 11.1-13.6). Academic/hospital sites had the lowest readability at 11.8, followed by nonprofit at 12.4 and commercial at 12.7 (P = .03). The mean understandability score was 71%, with academic/hospital sites at 81%, commercial at 73%, and nonprofit at 25%. Only 2 websites-Serenity Surgery and Cleveland Clinic-demonstrated actionability. Overall actionability was 18.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-38.9%), with 24 websites scoring 0% for actionability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current OPEMs concerning breast cryoablation fall short of the American Medical Association's recommendations for health literacy, averaging twice that level. Additionally, there is significant variability in the materials' understandability and actionability.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the Ice: Are Online Patient Educational Materials on Breast Cryoablation Readable and Understandable?\",\"authors\":\"Simon Kidanemariam, Antonio R Lopez, Grayson L Baird, Robert C Ward, Joey Z Gu, John McMenamy, Randy C Miles\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbi/wbaf024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Online patient education materials (OPEMs) provide valuable information on breast-related conditions and treatment options. We evaluated commonly accessed OPEMs related to breast cryoablation to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability metrics of educational materials available to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Google, the terms \\\"breast cryoablation,\\\" \\\"breast cryosurgery,\\\" and \\\"breast cryotherapy\\\" were queried. The top 50 websites providing OPEMs for the general public were identified by search ranking. A virtual private network was used, and location tracking, cookies, and user account information were disabled before querying. Sponsored content and research journal articles were excluded. Websites were categorized as academic/hospital, commercial, or nonprofit based on the hosting organization. Online patient education materials from the top 50 sites were downloaded and assessed for readability, understandability, and actionability. Mixed modeling, with sources nested within readability scores (automated readability, Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook), was used to evaluate these metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52 websites, the overall mean grade-level readability was 12.3 (95% CI, 11.1-13.6). Academic/hospital sites had the lowest readability at 11.8, followed by nonprofit at 12.4 and commercial at 12.7 (P = .03). The mean understandability score was 71%, with academic/hospital sites at 81%, commercial at 73%, and nonprofit at 25%. Only 2 websites-Serenity Surgery and Cleveland Clinic-demonstrated actionability. Overall actionability was 18.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-38.9%), with 24 websites scoring 0% for actionability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current OPEMs concerning breast cryoablation fall short of the American Medical Association's recommendations for health literacy, averaging twice that level. Additionally, there is significant variability in the materials' understandability and actionability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在线患者教育材料(OPEMs)提供有关乳房相关疾病和治疗方案的宝贵信息。我们评估了常用的与乳房冷冻消融相关的OPEMs,以评估患者可用的教育材料的可读性、可理解性和可操作性指标。方法:使用谷歌对“乳腺冷冻消融”、“乳腺冷冻手术”、“乳腺冷冻治疗”进行查询。通过搜索排名确定了为公众提供OPEMs的前50个网站。使用了虚拟专用网,在查询前禁用了位置跟踪、cookie和用户帐户信息。赞助内容和研究期刊文章被排除在外。根据托管机构的不同,网站被分为学术/医院、商业或非营利三类。从排名前50位的网站下载在线患者教育材料,并对其可读性、可理解性和可操作性进行评估。混合建模,在可读性评分(自动可读性,Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook)中嵌套源,被用来评估这些指标。结果:在52个网站中,总体平均年级水平可读性为12.3 (95% CI, 11.1-13.6)。学术/医院网站的可读性最低,为11.8,其次是非营利网站,为12.4,商业网站为12.7 (P = 0.03)。平均可理解性得分为71%,其中学术/医院网站为81%,商业网站为73%,非营利网站为25%。只有两个网站——宁静外科和克利夫兰诊所——证明了可操作性。总体可操作性为18.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-38.9%), 24个网站可操作性得分为0%。结论:目前关于乳房冷冻消融的OPEMs未达到美国医学协会建议的健康素养水平,平均为该水平的两倍。此外,在材料的可理解性和可操作性方面存在显著的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking the Ice: Are Online Patient Educational Materials on Breast Cryoablation Readable and Understandable?

Objective: Online patient education materials (OPEMs) provide valuable information on breast-related conditions and treatment options. We evaluated commonly accessed OPEMs related to breast cryoablation to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability metrics of educational materials available to patients.

Methods: Using Google, the terms "breast cryoablation," "breast cryosurgery," and "breast cryotherapy" were queried. The top 50 websites providing OPEMs for the general public were identified by search ranking. A virtual private network was used, and location tracking, cookies, and user account information were disabled before querying. Sponsored content and research journal articles were excluded. Websites were categorized as academic/hospital, commercial, or nonprofit based on the hosting organization. Online patient education materials from the top 50 sites were downloaded and assessed for readability, understandability, and actionability. Mixed modeling, with sources nested within readability scores (automated readability, Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook), was used to evaluate these metrics.

Results: Among 52 websites, the overall mean grade-level readability was 12.3 (95% CI, 11.1-13.6). Academic/hospital sites had the lowest readability at 11.8, followed by nonprofit at 12.4 and commercial at 12.7 (P = .03). The mean understandability score was 71%, with academic/hospital sites at 81%, commercial at 73%, and nonprofit at 25%. Only 2 websites-Serenity Surgery and Cleveland Clinic-demonstrated actionability. Overall actionability was 18.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-38.9%), with 24 websites scoring 0% for actionability.

Conclusion: Current OPEMs concerning breast cryoablation fall short of the American Medical Association's recommendations for health literacy, averaging twice that level. Additionally, there is significant variability in the materials' understandability and actionability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信