Sonya Bhole, Lars J Grimm, Jay R Parikh, Brian N Dontchos, Beatriu Reig, Sarah A Jacobs, Kristen Coffey, Brittany Z Dashevsky, Lisa A Mullen, Caroline Daly, Katerina Dodelzon
{"title":"乳腺成像人员短缺:确定问题并解决根本原因。","authors":"Sonya Bhole, Lars J Grimm, Jay R Parikh, Brian N Dontchos, Beatriu Reig, Sarah A Jacobs, Kristen Coffey, Brittany Z Dashevsky, Lisa A Mullen, Caroline Daly, Katerina Dodelzon","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the current perceptions of breast imaging staffing shortages and contributing factors among breast imaging radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey assessing current perception of breast radiologists regarding breast imaging-specific staffing shortages and contributing factors was developed by the Patient Care and Delivery Committee of the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and emailed to SBI active physician members. Bivariable analysis (chi-squared, t test) was performed between the survey demographics and survey response questions of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 309 responses (response rate of 15.7%). Most respondents perceived their practices to be short-staffed for breast radiologists (79%, 239/302), US technologists (74%, 216/290), mammography technologists (70%, 211/301), and support staff (66%, 201/302). Of the respondents who indicated they were short-staffed for breast imaging radiologists, 92% (226/246) believed it was due to insufficient number of radiologists, 67% (164/246) thought it was due to increase in volume, and 63% (154/246) attributed it to both increase in volume and insufficient number of breast imaging radiologists. Practices were more likely to be short-staffed if they had more practice sites (mean, 8.2 ± 7.1 vs 6.4 ± 8.4; P = .002), had fewer breast imaging radiologists (mean, 10.1 ± 9.6 vs 11.3 ± 11.5; P = .009), and were academic practices (35.1% vs 25.7%; P = .028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most breast imaging radiologists perceive their current breast imaging practices to be short-staffed for radiologists, mammography technologists, US technologists, and support staff. Understanding contributing factors is crucial to addressing root causes and mitigating impact on patient care and burnout across breast imaging team members.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast Imaging Staffing Shortages: Defining the Problem and Addressing Root Causes.\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Bhole, Lars J Grimm, Jay R Parikh, Brian N Dontchos, Beatriu Reig, Sarah A Jacobs, Kristen Coffey, Brittany Z Dashevsky, Lisa A Mullen, Caroline Daly, Katerina Dodelzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbi/wbaf031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the current perceptions of breast imaging staffing shortages and contributing factors among breast imaging radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey assessing current perception of breast radiologists regarding breast imaging-specific staffing shortages and contributing factors was developed by the Patient Care and Delivery Committee of the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and emailed to SBI active physician members. Bivariable analysis (chi-squared, t test) was performed between the survey demographics and survey response questions of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 309 responses (response rate of 15.7%). Most respondents perceived their practices to be short-staffed for breast radiologists (79%, 239/302), US technologists (74%, 216/290), mammography technologists (70%, 211/301), and support staff (66%, 201/302). Of the respondents who indicated they were short-staffed for breast imaging radiologists, 92% (226/246) believed it was due to insufficient number of radiologists, 67% (164/246) thought it was due to increase in volume, and 63% (154/246) attributed it to both increase in volume and insufficient number of breast imaging radiologists. Practices were more likely to be short-staffed if they had more practice sites (mean, 8.2 ± 7.1 vs 6.4 ± 8.4; P = .002), had fewer breast imaging radiologists (mean, 10.1 ± 9.6 vs 11.3 ± 11.5; P = .009), and were academic practices (35.1% vs 25.7%; P = .028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most breast imaging radiologists perceive their current breast imaging practices to be short-staffed for radiologists, mammography technologists, US technologists, and support staff. Understanding contributing factors is crucial to addressing root causes and mitigating impact on patient care and burnout across breast imaging team members.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估目前乳腺影像学医师对乳腺影像学人员短缺的看法及其影响因素。方法:由乳腺成像学会(SBI)的患者护理和分娩委员会(Patient Care and Delivery Committee)开展了一项调查,评估当前乳腺放射科医生对乳腺成像专业人员短缺及其影响因素的看法,并通过电子邮件发送给SBI的活跃医生成员。在调查人口统计数据和调查回答问题之间进行双变量分析(卡方,t检验)。结果:共获得应答309例,应答率15.7%。大多数受访者认为他们的诊所缺少乳腺放射科医生(79%,239/302)、美国技术人员(74%,216/290)、乳房x光检查技术人员(70%,211/301)和支持人员(66%,201/302)。在表示乳腺影像放射科医生人手不足的受访者中,92%(226/246)认为是由于放射科医生人数不足,67%(164/246)认为是由于数量增加,63%(154/246)认为是由于数量增加和数量不足。如果他们有更多的实践场所,实践更有可能出现人员短缺(平均,8.2±7.1 vs 6.4±8.4;P =。002),乳腺影像放射科医师较少(平均10.1±9.6 vs 11.3±11.5;P =。009)和学术实践(35.1% vs 25.7%; P = 0.028)。结论:大多数乳腺成像放射科医生认为他们目前的乳腺成像实践存在放射科医生、乳房x线摄影技术人员、美国技术人员和支持人员的短缺。了解影响因素对于解决根本原因和减轻对患者护理的影响以及乳房成像团队成员的倦怠至关重要。
Breast Imaging Staffing Shortages: Defining the Problem and Addressing Root Causes.
Objective: To assess the current perceptions of breast imaging staffing shortages and contributing factors among breast imaging radiologists.
Methods: A survey assessing current perception of breast radiologists regarding breast imaging-specific staffing shortages and contributing factors was developed by the Patient Care and Delivery Committee of the Society of Breast Imaging (SBI) and emailed to SBI active physician members. Bivariable analysis (chi-squared, t test) was performed between the survey demographics and survey response questions of interest.
Results: There were 309 responses (response rate of 15.7%). Most respondents perceived their practices to be short-staffed for breast radiologists (79%, 239/302), US technologists (74%, 216/290), mammography technologists (70%, 211/301), and support staff (66%, 201/302). Of the respondents who indicated they were short-staffed for breast imaging radiologists, 92% (226/246) believed it was due to insufficient number of radiologists, 67% (164/246) thought it was due to increase in volume, and 63% (154/246) attributed it to both increase in volume and insufficient number of breast imaging radiologists. Practices were more likely to be short-staffed if they had more practice sites (mean, 8.2 ± 7.1 vs 6.4 ± 8.4; P = .002), had fewer breast imaging radiologists (mean, 10.1 ± 9.6 vs 11.3 ± 11.5; P = .009), and were academic practices (35.1% vs 25.7%; P = .028).
Conclusions: Most breast imaging radiologists perceive their current breast imaging practices to be short-staffed for radiologists, mammography technologists, US technologists, and support staff. Understanding contributing factors is crucial to addressing root causes and mitigating impact on patient care and burnout across breast imaging team members.