为什么很难理解澳大利亚的兽医远程医疗监管规则?

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-01
Chris Corns
{"title":"为什么很难理解澳大利亚的兽医远程医疗监管规则?","authors":"Chris Corns","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the importance of veterinary telemedicine, there are no Acts or regulations that regulate the practice in Australia. It has been left to veterinary boards to provide non-statutory guidance in the form of general codes of professional practice and professional standards. Identifying the rules governing veterinary telemedicine is difficult because different sets of laws and rules apply in each jurisdiction and those laws and rules are not always consistent. More specifically, in the absence of a physical examination of the animal by a veterinarian, telemedicine does not fit \"neatly\" into traditional principles of veterinary practice and the regulation of scheduled drugs. All this leads to uncertainty and a lack of clarity. This article explores these issues by examining the key rules in each jurisdiction. Some reference is also made to the equivalent rules governing telehealth (also an unregulated space) for the medical profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"32 2","pages":"323-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is it Difficult to Understand the Rules Regulating Veterinary Telemedicine in Australia?\",\"authors\":\"Chris Corns\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the importance of veterinary telemedicine, there are no Acts or regulations that regulate the practice in Australia. It has been left to veterinary boards to provide non-statutory guidance in the form of general codes of professional practice and professional standards. Identifying the rules governing veterinary telemedicine is difficult because different sets of laws and rules apply in each jurisdiction and those laws and rules are not always consistent. More specifically, in the absence of a physical examination of the animal by a veterinarian, telemedicine does not fit \\\"neatly\\\" into traditional principles of veterinary practice and the regulation of scheduled drugs. All this leads to uncertainty and a lack of clarity. This article explores these issues by examining the key rules in each jurisdiction. Some reference is also made to the equivalent rules governing telehealth (also an unregulated space) for the medical profession.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"323-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管兽医远程医疗很重要,但澳大利亚没有任何法律或法规来规范这种做法。兽医委员会以一般专业行为守则和专业标准的形式提供非法定指导。确定管理兽医远程医疗的规则是困难的,因为每个司法管辖区适用不同的法律和规则,而这些法律和规则并不总是一致的。更具体地说,在没有兽医对动物进行身体检查的情况下,远程医疗不能“完全”符合兽医实践的传统原则和计划药物的监管。所有这些都导致了不确定性和缺乏明确性。本文通过研究每个司法管辖区的关键规则来探讨这些问题。还提到了管理医疗专业远程保健(也是一个不受管制的领域)的等效规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why is it Difficult to Understand the Rules Regulating Veterinary Telemedicine in Australia?

Despite the importance of veterinary telemedicine, there are no Acts or regulations that regulate the practice in Australia. It has been left to veterinary boards to provide non-statutory guidance in the form of general codes of professional practice and professional standards. Identifying the rules governing veterinary telemedicine is difficult because different sets of laws and rules apply in each jurisdiction and those laws and rules are not always consistent. More specifically, in the absence of a physical examination of the animal by a veterinarian, telemedicine does not fit "neatly" into traditional principles of veterinary practice and the regulation of scheduled drugs. All this leads to uncertainty and a lack of clarity. This article explores these issues by examining the key rules in each jurisdiction. Some reference is also made to the equivalent rules governing telehealth (also an unregulated space) for the medical profession.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信