微创非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术作为高危患者的姑息性血运重建术。

IF 2.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Magdalena Rufa, Adrian Ursulescu, Samir Ahad, Ragi Nagib, Marc Albert, Rafael Ayala, Nora Göbel, Tunjay Shavahatli, Mihnea Ghinescu, Ulrich Franke, Bartosz Rylski
{"title":"微创非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术作为高危患者的姑息性血运重建术。","authors":"Magdalena Rufa, Adrian Ursulescu, Samir Ahad, Ragi Nagib, Marc Albert, Rafael Ayala, Nora Göbel, Tunjay Shavahatli, Mihnea Ghinescu, Ulrich Franke, Bartosz Rylski","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15080147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) posed an unacceptable perioperative risk, patients were scheduled for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting or minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). We called this approach \"palliative revascularization.\" This study assesses the safety and impact of palliative revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival. <b>Methods:</b> A consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MICS-CABG as a palliative surgery between 2008 and 2018 was included. The decision for palliative surgery was met in heart team after carefully assessing each case. The patients underwent single or double-vessel revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and rarely radial artery/saphenous vein segments, both endoscopically harvested. Inpatient data could be completed for all 57 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 4.2 ± 3.7 years, with a follow-up rate of 91.2%. <b>Results:</b> Mean patient age was 79.7 ± 7.4 years. Overall, 46 patients (80.7%) were male, 26 (45.6%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 25 (43.9%) of chronic kidney disease. In total, 13 patients exhibited a moderate EuroSCORE II, while 27 were classified as high risk, with a EuroSCORE II exceeding 5%. Additionally, 40 patients (70.2%) presented with three-vessel disease, 17 (29.8%) suffered an acute myocardial infarction within three weeks prior to surgery and 50.9% presented an impaired ejection fraction. There were 48 MIDCAB and nine MICS CABG with no conversions either to sternotomy or to CPB. Eight cases were planned as hybrid procedures and only 15 patients (26.3%) were completely revascularized. During the first 30 days, four patients (7%) died. A myocardial infarction occurred in only one case, no patient necessitated immediate reoperation. The one-, three- and five-year survival rates were 83%, 67% and 61%, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> MIDCAB and MICS CABG can be successfully conducted as less invasive palliative surgery in high-risk multimorbid patients with MV CAD. The early and mid-term results were better than predicted. A higher rate of hybrid procedures could improve long-term outcome in selected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Rufa, Adrian Ursulescu, Samir Ahad, Ragi Nagib, Marc Albert, Rafael Ayala, Nora Göbel, Tunjay Shavahatli, Mihnea Ghinescu, Ulrich Franke, Bartosz Rylski\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract15080147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) posed an unacceptable perioperative risk, patients were scheduled for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting or minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). We called this approach \\\"palliative revascularization.\\\" This study assesses the safety and impact of palliative revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival. <b>Methods:</b> A consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MICS-CABG as a palliative surgery between 2008 and 2018 was included. The decision for palliative surgery was met in heart team after carefully assessing each case. The patients underwent single or double-vessel revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and rarely radial artery/saphenous vein segments, both endoscopically harvested. Inpatient data could be completed for all 57 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 4.2 ± 3.7 years, with a follow-up rate of 91.2%. <b>Results:</b> Mean patient age was 79.7 ± 7.4 years. Overall, 46 patients (80.7%) were male, 26 (45.6%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 25 (43.9%) of chronic kidney disease. In total, 13 patients exhibited a moderate EuroSCORE II, while 27 were classified as high risk, with a EuroSCORE II exceeding 5%. Additionally, 40 patients (70.2%) presented with three-vessel disease, 17 (29.8%) suffered an acute myocardial infarction within three weeks prior to surgery and 50.9% presented an impaired ejection fraction. There were 48 MIDCAB and nine MICS CABG with no conversions either to sternotomy or to CPB. Eight cases were planned as hybrid procedures and only 15 patients (26.3%) were completely revascularized. During the first 30 days, four patients (7%) died. A myocardial infarction occurred in only one case, no patient necessitated immediate reoperation. The one-, three- and five-year survival rates were 83%, 67% and 61%, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> MIDCAB and MICS CABG can be successfully conducted as less invasive palliative surgery in high-risk multimorbid patients with MV CAD. The early and mid-term results were better than predicted. A higher rate of hybrid procedures could improve long-term outcome in selected cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"15 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12384423/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在高危和虚弱的多支冠状动脉疾病(MV CAD)患者中,指南指出,无论是否使用体外循环(CPB),完全血运重建术都有很高的发病率和死亡率。如果认为导管干预不合适,常规冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)存在不可接受的围手术期风险,则安排患者进行微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术(MIDCAB)或微创多支冠状动脉旁路移植术(MICS-CABG)。我们称这种方法为“姑息性血运重建术”。本研究评估了姑息性血运重建术的安全性和对临床结果和总生存期的影响。方法:纳入2008年至2018年期间连续57例接受MIDCAB或MICS-CABG作为姑息性手术的患者。心内科在仔细评估每个病例后,决定进行姑息性手术。患者接受单血管或双血管重建术,使用左胸内动脉,很少使用桡动脉/隐静脉段,均在内镜下切除。所有57例患者的住院数据均可完成。平均随访时间4.2±3.7年,随访率91.2%。结果:患者平均年龄79.7±7.4岁。总体而言,46例(80.7%)为男性,26例(45.6%)有房颤病史,25例(43.9%)有慢性肾脏疾病。总共有13名患者表现为中度EuroSCORE II, 27名患者被分类为高风险,EuroSCORE II超过5%。此外,40名患者(70.2%)出现三支血管疾病,17名患者(29.8%)在手术前三周内发生急性心肌梗死,50.9%患者出现射血分数受损。48例MIDCAB和9例MICS CABG均未转为胸骨切开术或CPB。8例计划采用混合手术,只有15例(26.3%)完全血运重建。在前30天,4名患者(7%)死亡。仅1例发生心肌梗死,无患者需要立即再手术。1年、3年和5年生存率分别为83%、67%和61%。结论:MIDCAB和MICS CABG作为一种微创姑息性手术,可以成功地治疗高危多病中MV CAD患者。早期和中期的结果比预期的要好。较高的混合手术率可以改善选定病例的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients.

Background: In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) posed an unacceptable perioperative risk, patients were scheduled for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting or minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). We called this approach "palliative revascularization." This study assesses the safety and impact of palliative revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival. Methods: A consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MICS-CABG as a palliative surgery between 2008 and 2018 was included. The decision for palliative surgery was met in heart team after carefully assessing each case. The patients underwent single or double-vessel revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and rarely radial artery/saphenous vein segments, both endoscopically harvested. Inpatient data could be completed for all 57 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 4.2 ± 3.7 years, with a follow-up rate of 91.2%. Results: Mean patient age was 79.7 ± 7.4 years. Overall, 46 patients (80.7%) were male, 26 (45.6%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 25 (43.9%) of chronic kidney disease. In total, 13 patients exhibited a moderate EuroSCORE II, while 27 were classified as high risk, with a EuroSCORE II exceeding 5%. Additionally, 40 patients (70.2%) presented with three-vessel disease, 17 (29.8%) suffered an acute myocardial infarction within three weeks prior to surgery and 50.9% presented an impaired ejection fraction. There were 48 MIDCAB and nine MICS CABG with no conversions either to sternotomy or to CPB. Eight cases were planned as hybrid procedures and only 15 patients (26.3%) were completely revascularized. During the first 30 days, four patients (7%) died. A myocardial infarction occurred in only one case, no patient necessitated immediate reoperation. The one-, three- and five-year survival rates were 83%, 67% and 61%, respectively. Conclusions: MIDCAB and MICS CABG can be successfully conducted as less invasive palliative surgery in high-risk multimorbid patients with MV CAD. The early and mid-term results were better than predicted. A higher rate of hybrid procedures could improve long-term outcome in selected cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信