椎弓根螺钉松动:危险因素和结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Kari Odland, Todd J Pottinger, Peter M Grund, David W Polly
{"title":"椎弓根螺钉松动:危险因素和结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Kari Odland, Todd J Pottinger, Peter M Grund, David W Polly","doi":"10.14444/8773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in fixation techniques, S1 pedicle screw loosening remains a common complication of lumbosacral fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar conditions, with reported rates ranging from 15.6% to 41.9%. This complication can compromise fusion success, leading to nonunion, adjacent segment disease, and revision surgeries. Compared with other surgical challenges, less is known about the incidence and predictors of S1 pedicle screw loosening. Given the high prevalence of S1 screw loosening and its associated complications, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to report the incidence and risk factors contributing to S1 pedicle screw loosening in sacral fixation for degenerative lumbar conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted across 2 databases: PubMed and OVID. Study inclusion criteria were adults (age >18 years) undergoing lumbar fusion with S1 sacral fixation for degenerative lumbar conditions, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and radiographic confirmation of screw loosening. Eligible studies included cohort or case-control designs that reported screw loosening rates. Extracted data included patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index, and bone mineral density [BMD]), surgical factors (screw type, length, and number of fusion levels), and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 174 studies queried, 21 met inclusion criteria, comprising 2598 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with sacral fixation with S1 pedicle screws (mean age 62 ± 7.2 years). The overall screw loosening rate in patients was 23.8% (696/2924) but varied from 3.0% to 55.0%. The pooled proportion of S1 pedicle screw loosening in patients after lumbosacral fixation was 27% (relative risk = 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.34, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). When assessed per screw, the screw-specific loosening rate was 8.7%. The pooled proportion of individual S1 pedicle screws loosening after lumbosacral fixation is 10% (relative risks = 0.10, 95% CI 0.06-0.17, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Among included patients, the mean BMD was -0.63 ± 1.5, and the mean vertebral bone quality score was 3.3 ± 0.02.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aggregate rate of S1 pedicle screw loosening after sacral fixation is 23.8%, highlighting a significant complication rate that may compromise surgical success. This complication is associated with adverse outcomes, pseudarthrosis, and adjacent segment disease, which can significantly impact patient quality of life. The high failure rate emphasizes the need for careful surgical planning, including patient-specific considerations such as BMD and vertebral bone quality, as well as the selection of optimal fixation techniques in lumbosacral fusion surgeries.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>While advancements in surgical techniques and hardware design have reduced failure rates, the persistent variability across studies underscores the need for further research.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 1: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":"19 4","pages":"426-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"S1 Pedicle Screw Loosening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors and Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Kari Odland, Todd J Pottinger, Peter M Grund, David W Polly\",\"doi\":\"10.14444/8773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in fixation techniques, S1 pedicle screw loosening remains a common complication of lumbosacral fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar conditions, with reported rates ranging from 15.6% to 41.9%. This complication can compromise fusion success, leading to nonunion, adjacent segment disease, and revision surgeries. Compared with other surgical challenges, less is known about the incidence and predictors of S1 pedicle screw loosening. Given the high prevalence of S1 screw loosening and its associated complications, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to report the incidence and risk factors contributing to S1 pedicle screw loosening in sacral fixation for degenerative lumbar conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted across 2 databases: PubMed and OVID. Study inclusion criteria were adults (age >18 years) undergoing lumbar fusion with S1 sacral fixation for degenerative lumbar conditions, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and radiographic confirmation of screw loosening. Eligible studies included cohort or case-control designs that reported screw loosening rates. Extracted data included patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index, and bone mineral density [BMD]), surgical factors (screw type, length, and number of fusion levels), and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 174 studies queried, 21 met inclusion criteria, comprising 2598 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with sacral fixation with S1 pedicle screws (mean age 62 ± 7.2 years). The overall screw loosening rate in patients was 23.8% (696/2924) but varied from 3.0% to 55.0%. The pooled proportion of S1 pedicle screw loosening in patients after lumbosacral fixation was 27% (relative risk = 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.34, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). When assessed per screw, the screw-specific loosening rate was 8.7%. The pooled proportion of individual S1 pedicle screws loosening after lumbosacral fixation is 10% (relative risks = 0.10, 95% CI 0.06-0.17, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Among included patients, the mean BMD was -0.63 ± 1.5, and the mean vertebral bone quality score was 3.3 ± 0.02.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aggregate rate of S1 pedicle screw loosening after sacral fixation is 23.8%, highlighting a significant complication rate that may compromise surgical success. This complication is associated with adverse outcomes, pseudarthrosis, and adjacent segment disease, which can significantly impact patient quality of life. The high failure rate emphasizes the need for careful surgical planning, including patient-specific considerations such as BMD and vertebral bone quality, as well as the selection of optimal fixation techniques in lumbosacral fusion surgeries.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>While advancements in surgical techniques and hardware design have reduced failure rates, the persistent variability across studies underscores the need for further research.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 1: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"426-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14444/8773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管固定技术有所进步,S1椎弓根螺钉松动仍然是腰骶融合手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的常见并发症,据报道其发生率为15.6%至41.9%。这种并发症会影响融合的成功,导致骨不连、邻近节段疾病和翻修手术。与其他手术挑战相比,我们对S1椎弓根螺钉松动的发生率和预测因素知之甚少。考虑到S1螺钉松动及其相关并发症的高发病率,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在报道腰椎退行性疾病骶骨固定中S1椎弓根螺钉松动的发生率和危险因素。方法:通过PubMed和OVID两个数据库进行文献检索。研究纳入标准为成人(年龄bb ~ 18岁),因腰椎退行性疾病行腰椎融合术+ S1骶骨固定,随访时间至少12个月,影像学证实螺钉松动。符合条件的研究包括报道螺钉松动率的队列或病例对照设计。提取的数据包括患者人口统计数据(年龄、性别、体重指数和骨密度[BMD])、手术因素(螺钉类型、长度和融合水平数量)和并发症发生率。结果:被查询的174项研究中,21项符合纳入标准,其中包括2598例采用S1椎弓根螺钉行腰椎融合骶骨固定的患者(平均年龄62±7.2岁)。患者的整体螺钉松动率为23.8%(696/2924),但从3.0%到55.0%不等。腰骶固定后S1椎弓根螺钉松动的合并比例为27%(相对风险= 0.27,95% CI 0.22-0.34, P < 0.0001)。当评估每颗螺钉时,螺钉特异性松动率为8.7%。腰骶固定后单个S1椎弓根螺钉松动的合并比例为10%(相对风险= 0.10,95% CI 0.06-0.17, P < 0.0001)。纳入患者骨密度平均值为-0.63±1.5,椎体骨质量平均值为3.3±0.02。结论:骶椎固定后S1椎弓根螺钉总松动率为23.8%,并发症发生率高,可能影响手术成功率。该并发症与不良结局、假关节和邻近节段疾病相关,可显著影响患者的生活质量。高失败率强调需要仔细的手术计划,包括患者的具体考虑,如骨密度和椎体骨质量,以及选择最佳的固定技术在腰骶融合手术。临床相关性:虽然手术技术和硬件设计的进步降低了失败率,但研究中持续的变异性强调了进一步研究的必要性。证据等级:1:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
S1 Pedicle Screw Loosening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors and Outcomes.

Background: Despite advancements in fixation techniques, S1 pedicle screw loosening remains a common complication of lumbosacral fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar conditions, with reported rates ranging from 15.6% to 41.9%. This complication can compromise fusion success, leading to nonunion, adjacent segment disease, and revision surgeries. Compared with other surgical challenges, less is known about the incidence and predictors of S1 pedicle screw loosening. Given the high prevalence of S1 screw loosening and its associated complications, this systematic review and meta-analysis aim to report the incidence and risk factors contributing to S1 pedicle screw loosening in sacral fixation for degenerative lumbar conditions.

Methods: The literature search was conducted across 2 databases: PubMed and OVID. Study inclusion criteria were adults (age >18 years) undergoing lumbar fusion with S1 sacral fixation for degenerative lumbar conditions, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and radiographic confirmation of screw loosening. Eligible studies included cohort or case-control designs that reported screw loosening rates. Extracted data included patient demographics (age, gender, body mass index, and bone mineral density [BMD]), surgical factors (screw type, length, and number of fusion levels), and complication rates.

Results: Of 174 studies queried, 21 met inclusion criteria, comprising 2598 patients who underwent lumbar fusion with sacral fixation with S1 pedicle screws (mean age 62 ± 7.2 years). The overall screw loosening rate in patients was 23.8% (696/2924) but varied from 3.0% to 55.0%. The pooled proportion of S1 pedicle screw loosening in patients after lumbosacral fixation was 27% (relative risk = 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.34, P < 0.0001). When assessed per screw, the screw-specific loosening rate was 8.7%. The pooled proportion of individual S1 pedicle screws loosening after lumbosacral fixation is 10% (relative risks = 0.10, 95% CI 0.06-0.17, P < 0.0001). Among included patients, the mean BMD was -0.63 ± 1.5, and the mean vertebral bone quality score was 3.3 ± 0.02.

Conclusion: The aggregate rate of S1 pedicle screw loosening after sacral fixation is 23.8%, highlighting a significant complication rate that may compromise surgical success. This complication is associated with adverse outcomes, pseudarthrosis, and adjacent segment disease, which can significantly impact patient quality of life. The high failure rate emphasizes the need for careful surgical planning, including patient-specific considerations such as BMD and vertebral bone quality, as well as the selection of optimal fixation techniques in lumbosacral fusion surgeries.

Clinical relevance: While advancements in surgical techniques and hardware design have reduced failure rates, the persistent variability across studies underscores the need for further research.

Level of evidence: 1:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信