慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断指南依从性的临床差异:数据库研究。

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-08-22 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0263
Alex Bottle, Alex Adamson, Benedict Hayhoe, Jennifer K Quint
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断指南依从性的临床差异:数据库研究。","authors":"Alex Bottle, Alex Adamson, Benedict Hayhoe, Jennifer K Quint","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis is vital, but little is known about compliance with relevant diagnostic guidelines or variation in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To quantify between-practice variations in guideline compliance and over time.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>observational study in English primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used to assess the use of four pre-diagnostic investigations (spirometry, chest X-ray, FBC and BMI) by GP practices for patients with COPD recorded first in primary care, in three time periods: 2006-7 (cohort 1), 2016-7 (cohort 2), and Mar-Aug 2020 (cohort 3). Multilevel logistic regression models quantified the non-random variation between GP practices in spirometry around diagnosis. Funnel plots counted the proportion of outliers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohort totals were 31 676 (cohort 1), 37 393 (cohort 2) and 3368 (cohort 3). Overall, the mean age was 68.3 years (SD 12.0), with 47.3% female. The use of pre-diagnosis spirometry improved a little in cohort 2 (74.2%) on cohort 1 (62.8%) but fell back for the COVID-era group (61.1%). In contrast, chest X-ray, FBC and BMI all improved after cohort 1 and were maintained for the COVID cohort; almost all patients received one of these. The proportion receiving all four before diagnosis jumped from 26.6% in cohort 1% to 46.7% in cohort 2 and was maintained in cohort 3 (43.0%). Modelling and funnel plots showed considerable non-random variation in spirometry use by practice, though with some improvement since cohort 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recording of spirometry and chest X-rays warrants further and consistent improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between-practice variation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis guideline compliance: database study.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Bottle, Alex Adamson, Benedict Hayhoe, Jennifer K Quint\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis is vital, but little is known about compliance with relevant diagnostic guidelines or variation in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To quantify between-practice variations in guideline compliance and over time.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>observational study in English primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used to assess the use of four pre-diagnostic investigations (spirometry, chest X-ray, FBC and BMI) by GP practices for patients with COPD recorded first in primary care, in three time periods: 2006-7 (cohort 1), 2016-7 (cohort 2), and Mar-Aug 2020 (cohort 3). Multilevel logistic regression models quantified the non-random variation between GP practices in spirometry around diagnosis. Funnel plots counted the proportion of outliers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cohort totals were 31 676 (cohort 1), 37 393 (cohort 2) and 3368 (cohort 3). Overall, the mean age was 68.3 years (SD 12.0), with 47.3% female. The use of pre-diagnosis spirometry improved a little in cohort 2 (74.2%) on cohort 1 (62.8%) but fell back for the COVID-era group (61.1%). In contrast, chest X-ray, FBC and BMI all improved after cohort 1 and were maintained for the COVID cohort; almost all patients received one of these. The proportion receiving all four before diagnosis jumped from 26.6% in cohort 1% to 46.7% in cohort 2 and was maintained in cohort 3 (43.0%). Modelling and funnel plots showed considerable non-random variation in spirometry use by practice, though with some improvement since cohort 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recording of spirometry and chest X-rays warrants further and consistent improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的早期诊断至关重要,但对相关诊断指南的依从性或初级保健的变化知之甚少。目的:量化实践间指南依从性和随时间的变化。设计与背景:英国初级保健的观察性研究。方法:临床实践研究数据链(Clinical Practice Research Datalink)用于评估全科医生在2006- 2007年(队列1)、2016- 2007年(队列2)和2020年3月- 8月(队列3)三个时间段首次在初级保健中记录的COPD患者的四项诊断前调查(肺活量测定、胸部x线、FBC和BMI)的使用情况。多水平逻辑回归模型量化了全科医生在诊断前后肺活量测定的非随机差异。漏斗图计算异常值的比例。结果:队列总数为31 676人(队列1),37 393人(队列2)和3368人(队列3)。总体而言,平均年龄为68.3岁(SD 12.0),其中47.3%为女性。在队列2(74.2%)和队列1(62.8%)中,诊断前肺活量测定仪的使用略有改善,但在新冠肺炎组(61.1%)中有所下降。相比之下,胸部x线、FBC和BMI在队列1后均有所改善,并在COVID队列中保持不变;几乎所有的病人都接受了其中的一种。在诊断前接受所有四种治疗的比例从队列1的26.6%跃升至队列2的46.7%,并在队列3保持不变(43.0%)。模型和漏斗图显示,尽管自队列1以来有所改善,但实践中肺活量测定的使用存在相当大的非随机差异。结论:肺活量测定和胸片记录值得进一步和持续的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between-practice variation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis guideline compliance: database study.

Background: Early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis is vital, but little is known about compliance with relevant diagnostic guidelines or variation in primary care.

Aim: To quantify between-practice variations in guideline compliance and over time.

Design & setting: observational study in English primary care.

Method: The Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used to assess the use of four pre-diagnostic investigations (spirometry, chest X-ray, FBC and BMI) by GP practices for patients with COPD recorded first in primary care, in three time periods: 2006-7 (cohort 1), 2016-7 (cohort 2), and Mar-Aug 2020 (cohort 3). Multilevel logistic regression models quantified the non-random variation between GP practices in spirometry around diagnosis. Funnel plots counted the proportion of outliers.

Results: Cohort totals were 31 676 (cohort 1), 37 393 (cohort 2) and 3368 (cohort 3). Overall, the mean age was 68.3 years (SD 12.0), with 47.3% female. The use of pre-diagnosis spirometry improved a little in cohort 2 (74.2%) on cohort 1 (62.8%) but fell back for the COVID-era group (61.1%). In contrast, chest X-ray, FBC and BMI all improved after cohort 1 and were maintained for the COVID cohort; almost all patients received one of these. The proportion receiving all four before diagnosis jumped from 26.6% in cohort 1% to 46.7% in cohort 2 and was maintained in cohort 3 (43.0%). Modelling and funnel plots showed considerable non-random variation in spirometry use by practice, though with some improvement since cohort 1.

Conclusions: The recording of spirometry and chest X-rays warrants further and consistent improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信