与非配药做法相比,配药做法发出的处方长度更短。

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115
Ian Holdroyd, Liam Loftus, Cameron Appel, Efthalia Massou, John Ford
{"title":"与非配药做法相比,配药做法发出的处方长度更短。","authors":"Ian Holdroyd, Liam Loftus, Cameron Appel, Efthalia Massou, John Ford","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dispensing practices, which have in-house dispensaries, are paid to dispense medications directly to patients. Evidence suggests that this financial incentive influences prescribing behaviour, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the impact of dispensing status on prescription length in England.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Quasi-experimental, repeated-measures, cross-sectional study of English General Practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Business administration data classified practices as dispensing or non-dispensing, determined the percentage of patients eligible for dispensing, and captured prescription lengths for seven drugs with fixed dosing regimens at three-month intervals from July 2023 to April 2024. Generalised estimating equations analysed the relationship between dispensing status and the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing with average prescription length, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusting for patient and practice characteristics, dispensing practices prescribed shorter average lengths for all drugs. Desogestrel showed the largest difference (21.9 days shorter), followed by indapamide standard release (9.85 days), indapamide modified release (9.71 days), ezetimibe (8.41 days), tamsulosin (7.18 days), alendronic acid (6.63 days), and dapagliflozin (5.85 days). An increase in the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing was associated with significantly shorter prescription lengths across all drugs. Dispensing practices more consistently prescribed medications for 28-31 days, whereas non-dispensing practices showed greater variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dispensing practices are associated with shorter prescription lengths, increasing the number of prescriptions issued over time and the associated dispensing fee. The absence of clear guidance on prescription lengths likely contributes to this-central bodies should consider providing explicit recommendations to optimise prescription durations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared to non-dispensing practices.\",\"authors\":\"Ian Holdroyd, Liam Loftus, Cameron Appel, Efthalia Massou, John Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dispensing practices, which have in-house dispensaries, are paid to dispense medications directly to patients. Evidence suggests that this financial incentive influences prescribing behaviour, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the impact of dispensing status on prescription length in England.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Quasi-experimental, repeated-measures, cross-sectional study of English General Practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Business administration data classified practices as dispensing or non-dispensing, determined the percentage of patients eligible for dispensing, and captured prescription lengths for seven drugs with fixed dosing regimens at three-month intervals from July 2023 to April 2024. Generalised estimating equations analysed the relationship between dispensing status and the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing with average prescription length, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusting for patient and practice characteristics, dispensing practices prescribed shorter average lengths for all drugs. Desogestrel showed the largest difference (21.9 days shorter), followed by indapamide standard release (9.85 days), indapamide modified release (9.71 days), ezetimibe (8.41 days), tamsulosin (7.18 days), alendronic acid (6.63 days), and dapagliflozin (5.85 days). An increase in the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing was associated with significantly shorter prescription lengths across all drugs. Dispensing practices more consistently prescribed medications for 28-31 days, whereas non-dispensing practices showed greater variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dispensing practices are associated with shorter prescription lengths, increasing the number of prescriptions issued over time and the associated dispensing fee. The absence of clear guidance on prescription lengths likely contributes to this-central bodies should consider providing explicit recommendations to optimise prescription durations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:配药实践,有内部药房,支付直接分配药物给病人。有证据表明,这种经济激励会影响处方行为,尽管其潜在机制尚不清楚。目的:调查英国配药状况对处方长度的影响。设计与设置:准实验,重复测量,横断面研究的英语全科实践。方法:从2023年7月至2024年4月,企业管理数据将实践分为配药和非配药,确定符合配药条件的患者百分比,并以三个月为间隔捕获7种固定给药方案的处方长度。采用广义估计方程,在控制了患者和执业特征的情况下,以平均处方长度分析了调剂状况与符合调剂条件的患者比例之间的关系。结果:调整患者和实践特点,配药实践规定的所有药物的平均长度较短。去索地酮差异最大(缩短21.9天),其次是吲达帕胺标准释放期(9.85天)、吲达帕胺修饰释放期(9.71天)、依泽替米贝(8.41天)、坦索罗辛(7.18天)、阿仑替酸(6.63天)、达格列净(5.85天)。有资格配药的患者比例的增加与所有药物的处方长度显着缩短有关。配药实践在28-31天内更一致地开具处方药,而非配药实践表现出更大的可变性。结论:配药实践与较短的处方长度有关,随着时间的推移增加了处方数量和相关的配药费用。缺乏关于处方长度的明确指导可能导致这种情况-中央机构应考虑提供明确建议以优化处方持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dispensing practices issue shorter prescription lengths compared to non-dispensing practices.

Background: Dispensing practices, which have in-house dispensaries, are paid to dispense medications directly to patients. Evidence suggests that this financial incentive influences prescribing behaviour, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

Aim: To investigate the impact of dispensing status on prescription length in England.

Design & setting: Quasi-experimental, repeated-measures, cross-sectional study of English General Practices.

Method: Business administration data classified practices as dispensing or non-dispensing, determined the percentage of patients eligible for dispensing, and captured prescription lengths for seven drugs with fixed dosing regimens at three-month intervals from July 2023 to April 2024. Generalised estimating equations analysed the relationship between dispensing status and the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing with average prescription length, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.

Results: Adjusting for patient and practice characteristics, dispensing practices prescribed shorter average lengths for all drugs. Desogestrel showed the largest difference (21.9 days shorter), followed by indapamide standard release (9.85 days), indapamide modified release (9.71 days), ezetimibe (8.41 days), tamsulosin (7.18 days), alendronic acid (6.63 days), and dapagliflozin (5.85 days). An increase in the proportion of patients eligible for dispensing was associated with significantly shorter prescription lengths across all drugs. Dispensing practices more consistently prescribed medications for 28-31 days, whereas non-dispensing practices showed greater variability.

Conclusion: Dispensing practices are associated with shorter prescription lengths, increasing the number of prescriptions issued over time and the associated dispensing fee. The absence of clear guidance on prescription lengths likely contributes to this-central bodies should consider providing explicit recommendations to optimise prescription durations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信